67<br >144<br >161<br >195<br >201<br >Preface<br >I<br >"he Carnegie Council on Higher Education has had a continuing<br >nterest in the welfare of the private sector of higher education.<br > In More Than Survival (1975), we expressed concern for the<br >health of the private s~~tor," spoke of it as "one of the main sources<br >f strength" of higher education, and regretted that "the rules of the<br >game are r<br > In T<br >recommen<br >ow too often unfair to the private sector."<br >ie Federal Role in Postsecondar32 Education (1975), we<br >ted an expansion of the State Student Incentive Grant<br >(SSIG) program of the federal government and pioneered in<br >proposing a federal program of tuition equalization grants.<br > In Low or No Tuition (1975a), we were concerned with the<br >tuition gap between private and public institutions.<br > In The States and Higher Education (1976), we set forth, as one<br >of our five major concerns, the preservation of the private sector. We<br >noted its great contributions to diversity and to excellence.<br > This present report comes after the realization, in the early<br >1970s, that the financial situation of many private institutions of<br >higher education was precarious and after early efforts of the states<br >(and the federal government) to provide assistance. It precedes what<br >will be the intensified problems of the 1980s and early 1990s. It seeks<br >to present the situation as it now exists, to evaluate the programs<br >undertaken to date, and to make recommendations for future action.<br > We are concerned here chiefly with the responsibilities of the<br >states toward undergraduate education within nonprofit private<br >universities, comprehensive institutions, and liberal arts colleges.<br >Since graduate study and research activities within universities are<br ><br >
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有