From Publishers Weekly Montana 1948, Watson's previous novel, was a sleeper that booksellers boosted to major sales. In this finely crafted prequel to that book, Watson fleshes out the lives of county sheriff Julian Hayden and his Montana clan. As the episodic narrative opens, in 1924, Hayden's spoiled, headstrong, horny teenage sons, Wesley and Frank, get involved in a foolish escapade in North Dakota. Thrown into a freezing jail cell, they discover that even their politically connected father's influence has its limits. The story then doubles back to 1899 and Julian's frontier life as a struggling homesteader and rancher, newly resettled from Iowa with his widowed mother. As the action gradually moves into the 1930s, Wesley, now a sensitive and softhearted but troubled man, succeeds his father as county sheriff. Hoping to break her husband loose from the influence of his arrogant, domineering father, Wesley's levelheaded wife, Gail, tries to get him to open up, to show affection toward their infant son. Surprises and scenes of dramatic power punctuate the narrative, as when newlywed Julian pulls a gun on his hostile father-in-law, or when Len McAuley, Julian's hawk-faced, drunken deputy, burns with unrequited love for Gail. Throughout, Watson writes with ruthless honesty about his characters' stunted dreams, unpredictable emotions and outbursts of senseless violence, showing once again that he understands not only the West but the untamed hearts that have roamed it. Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc. From School Library Journal YA?Stories about men's relationships with their fathers always appeal to YAs, and this Western will be no exception. It opens in 1924 with Sheriff Julian Hayden's two teenage sons going on a hunting trip to North Dakota with their friends. Their father's word is law at home and in their hometown of Bentrock, Montana, and when they get in trouble, they learn that his influence extends into neighboring states as well. Next, readers are taken back to 1899 for the story of Julian Hayden as he moves west, makes a new life homesteading on the frontier, and begins a family. The book ends in the 1930s with a section told through the eyes of Len McAuley, Julian's deputy. Major and minor characters are well developed through dramatic scenes; believable dialogue; and layers of telling detail about their dreams, emotions, and violent outbursts. The sense of both place and time?the beauty and power of the climate and wide-open spaces?is very strong. Teens will like the episodic structure?the stories are very closely connected and they all examine different aspects of the family's relationships. This prequel to Montana 1948 (Milkweed, 1993) is a readable, well-written novel for leisure reading and historical fiction assignments.?Patricia Q. Noonan, Prince William Public Library, Manassas, VACopyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc. See all Editorial Reviews
评分
评分
评分
评分
不得不提的是,这本书的语言风格简直是一场华丽的冒险。它的句式长短不一,充满了各种复杂的从句和精妙的比喻,读起来有一种古典文学的厚重感,但内核却是极其现代和尖锐的。我时常需要放慢语速,甚至要倒回去重读几遍,才能完全领会作者在一个长句中埋下的多重含义。这种阅读的“阻力”,反而成了一种独特的乐趣。作者似乎在用文字雕刻一种氛围,那种略带疏离感和梦魇般的逻辑,让我联想到某些欧洲老电影的叙事手法。而且,书中对人物心理活动的描写,简直是教科书级别的案例。它不直接告诉你人物在想什么,而是通过一系列看似无关紧要的动作——比如反复摩挲手中的一枚旧硬币,或者对着镜子进行一场无声的辩论——来侧面烘托出人物内心的剧烈冲突。这种“留白”的艺术,高明之处就在于它把解释和想象的空间,慷慨地交还给了读者。坦白说,这本书需要你投入全部的专注力,它不会迁就那些只想快速浏览故事梗概的读者,它要求你成为一个共谋者,一个共同完成作品最后拼图的人。
评分这本书的结构和叙事角度,简直是文学上的一次大胆实验。作者采用了多线并进的叙事手法,但最让我感到惊奇的是,他似乎并不急于将这些线索缝合起来,而是让它们以一种近乎“平行宇宙”的方式各自发展,直到故事的后半段,我们才猛然意识到这些看似毫不相关的事件是如何在命运的某个交叉点上紧密相连的。这种叙事上的“延迟满足”,成功地吊住了我的胃口。更妙的是,他对不同人物的“声音”的塑造,简直是千人千面。我能清晰地分辨出那个老派学者的迂腐、那个年轻律师的急切,以及那个受害者的沉默。每一次视角的切换,都像换上了一副新的眼镜,让我从一个完全不同的角度去重新审视之前发生的一切。这种多重视角带来的信息增量,让原本看似简单的事件,瞬间变得立体而复杂。它教会了我,看待任何重大的冲突,我们都应该尝试去穿上所有相关方的鞋子走一走,因为没有绝对的旁观者,我们都是故事的一部分,即使我们身处局外。这本书的整体阅读体验,更像是一场需要高度参与的智力游戏,而不是被动接受的故事情节。
评分这本书的叙事结构真是精巧得令人拍案叫绝。作者似乎对人性的幽微之处有着近乎病态的洞察力,他没有采用那种传统意义上非黑即白的道德审判,而是将我们卷入一片灰色地带的漩涡。开篇的几个场景,那种压抑、沉重的氛围,就如同夏日午后一场突如其来的暴雨,让人喘不过气来。我特别欣赏他对细节的打磨,那种环境描写的细腻程度,仿佛能让我闻到空气中弥漫的尘土和旧书页的味道。那些看似漫不经心的对话,实则暗藏着巨大的信息量,需要读者反复咀嚼才能咂摸出其中真正的含义。故事推进的速度把握得如同一个技艺高超的钟表匠,时而缓慢得让人几乎要失去耐心,恰到好处地积累着张力;时而又在不经意间猛地加速,抛出一个令人措手不及的转折。这种节奏的控制,无疑是这本书最引人入胜的方面之一。它挑战了我们对既定规则的认知,迫使我们去思考,在极端情况下,我们愿意为“正义”付出怎样的代价,或者说,我们所坚守的“正义”的边界究竟在哪里。读完之后,那种回味悠长的感觉,就像是喝了一口极其浓烈却又带着一丝回甘的陈年威士忌,让人久久不能平静,并且开始重新审视自己过往的某些判断。
评分这本书对社会体制的批判,其力度之大,简直是令人咋舌的,但它的厉害之处在于,它没有陷入那种简单的“体制万恶论”的窠臼。作者的高明之处在于,他首先将那些看似坚不可摧的制度和规则,抽丝剥茧般地还原成由无数个“人”的恐惧、偏见和惰性共同堆砌而成的产物。在阅读过程中,我多次产生一种强烈的代入感,仿佛置身于一个由僵化的流程和无形压力构成的迷宫之中。那些被卷入其中的小人物,他们的挣扎、他们的妥协,都清晰地映照出现实社会中许多被我们习惯性忽略的灰色地带。尤其是在描写司法和权力运作的段落,作者的描述精准而冷峻,没有丝毫煽情,但其冰冷的逻辑链条却比任何激烈的控诉都更具震撼力。它迫使我思考,当我们高呼口号时,那些被忽略的个体命运究竟如何被裁决。这本书就像一面不加修饰的镜子,投射出权力结构下个体良知的脆弱性与坚韧性,让人在合上书页时,对我们习以为常的“秩序”产生深刻的怀疑。
评分读完这本书,我最大的感受是,作者在探讨一个宏大命题时,竟然能将其拆解得如此具有个人情感的穿透力。它不是那种高高在上的哲学思辨,而是扎根于生活肌理之中的挣扎与呼喊。我尤其被主人公在面对伦理困境时的那种近乎撕裂的状态所吸引。他的每一个决定,都像是在刀尖上跳舞,每一步都可能导致万劫不复的深渊。作者用一种近乎散文化的笔触,描绘了主人公内心的波澜壮阔,那种从最初的坚守到后来的动摇,再到最终的自我和解(抑或是一种妥协),每一步都写得真实得让人心疼。我甚至能在某些情节中看到我身边一些朋友的影子,他们也在日常琐事中摸索着何为对错。这本书的魅力在于,它避开了宏大叙事中常见的空洞说教,而是通过具体、可感的场景——比如一场深夜的争吵、一封未寄出的信、一个不经意的眼神——来构建起复杂的人性图景。这让阅读体验变得异常亲密,仿佛我不是在看一个故事,而是在偷窥一个真实灵魂的私密日记。它成功地把“大问题”还原成了“小情绪”,而正是这些小情绪,构成了我们生活的全部重量。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有