We live in a period of great uncertainty about the fate of America's global leadership. Many believe that Donald Trump's presidency marks the end of liberal international order-the very system of global institutions, rules, and values that shaped the American international system since the end of World War II. Trump's repeated rejection of liberal order, criticisms of long-term allies of the US, and affinity for authoritarian leaders certainly undermines the American international system, but the truth is that liberal international order has been quietly eroding for at least 15 years.
In Exit from Hegemony, Alexander Cooley and Daniel Nexon develop a new, integrated approach to understanding the rise and decline of hegemonic orders. Their approach identifies three distinct ways in which the liberal international order is undergoing fundamental transformation. First, Russia and China have targeted the order, positioning themselves as revisionist powers by establishing alternative regional institutions and pushing counter-norms. Second, weaker states are hollowing out the order by seeking patronage and security partnership from nations outside of the order, such as Saudi Arabia and China. Even though they do not always seek to disrupt American hegemony, these new patron-client relationships lack the same liberal political and economic conditions as those involving the United States and its democratic allies. Third, a new series of transnational networks emphasizing illiberalism, nationalism, and right-wing values increasing challenges the anti-authoritarian, progressive transnational networks of the 1990s. These three pathways erode the primacy of the liberal international order from above, laterally, and from below. The Trump administration, with its "America First" doctrine, accelerates all three processes, critically lessening America's position as a world power.
Alexander Cooley is Director of Columbia University's Harriman Institute for the study of Russia, Eurasia and Eastern Europe and the Claire Tow Professor of Political Science at Barnard College of Columbia University. His books include Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia (Oxford), Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, and Dictators without Borders: Power and Money in Central Asia. In addition to his academic work, Professor Cooley serves on a range of international advisory bodies and working groups engaged with the region and has testified for Congressional committees on Eurasian issues.
Daniel Nexon is an Associate Professor in the Department of Government and the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He has held fellowships from Stanford University's Center for International Security, Cooperation and at the Ohio State University's Mershon Center for International Studies. From 2009-2010, he was a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow in the US Department of Defense. In 2016, he helped coordinate the unofficial foreign-policy group for the Bernie Sanders campaign, and he remains active in efforts to forge progressive foreign policy principles. He is the author of The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. He founded, and used to blog, at The Duck of Minerva. He currently blogs at Lawyers, Guns and Money.
评分
评分
评分
评分
《Exit from Hegemony》这个书名,让我立刻联想到了人类历史上无数次的权力转移和地缘政治的变迁。它仿佛一个隐喻,指向了那些曾经的主导者如何走向衰落,或者那些被压迫者如何寻求突破。我很好奇,这本书会从哪个角度来解读“霸权”的退出?是关于经济衰退、军事力量的萎缩,还是文化影响力的式微?抑或是,它会更侧重于意识形态的裂痕,当曾经的“普适价值”不再具有吸引力时,霸权的基础又将如何动摇?我猜想,作者可能会对一些历史上的关键时期进行深入的分析,比如古希腊城邦的兴衰、罗马帝国的扩张与瓦解、又或是近代欧洲列强的此消彼长。更吸引我的是,“Exit”这个词,它不仅仅意味着终结,更蕴含着一种主动的行动,一种对新方向的探索。这是否意味着,书中会探讨那些曾经的霸权如何试图转型,或者被边缘化的力量如何重新崛起,开辟新的道路?我期待这本书能够提供给我一种看待世界格局的新视角,帮助我理解当前国际关系中的复杂动态,以及那些正在发生的、或即将发生的权力结构调整。它应该是一本能够引发深刻思考,并且对当下具有现实意义的作品。
评分这本书的名字《Exit from Hegemony》一瞬间就抓住了我的眼球。我本身对国际政治和历史的演变一直抱有浓厚的兴趣,而“Hegemony”这个词,本身就蕴含着权力、统治、以及与之而来的挑战和变革。我猜想,这本书应该会深入探讨一个国家或一个体系如何从主导地位走向衰落,或者如何主动寻求摆脱某种形式的压制与束缚。这其中的过程,往往伴随着复杂的政治博弈、经济调整、文化冲突,甚至可能是一场深刻的社会转型。我特别期待作者能够剖析这种“退出”的动力和机制,究竟是内部的腐朽,还是外部的压力,抑或是两者共同作用的结果。而且,“Exit”这个词,也暗示着一种寻找出路、寻求新生或重新定位的积极姿态。它不单单是失败的终结,更可能是另一种开始。我想象着书中可能会有对历史上的重大转折点进行案例分析,比如罗马帝国的衰落、大英帝国的日落,或是冷战格局的瓦解。作者可能会从宏观的理论层面,比如地缘政治、经济周期、意识形态的变迁等方面入手,也可能从微观的个体层面,比如领导者的决策、民众的情绪、社会运动的兴起等角度进行阐述。无论如何,我坚信这本书会提供给我一个看待世界格局演变的新视角,让我更深刻地理解当前全球化浪潮下的复杂力量。
评分《Exit from Hegemony》这个标题,仿佛一束探照灯,瞬间点亮了我对历史长河中那些波澜壮阔的权力更迭的好奇心。我总觉得,每一个看似牢不可破的霸权,其内部都孕育着走向终结的种子,而那些试图打破枷锁、寻求独立自主的力量,则如同破土而出的嫩芽,充满着不确定性与希望。我迫不及待地想知道,作者将以怎样的笔触,描绘出这种“退出”的图景。它会是一场轰轰烈烈的革命,还是潜移默化的瓦解?是主动的战略调整,还是被动的衰落必然?我设想着书中可能会充斥着精彩纷呈的故事,或许是某个帝国如何一步步走向衰亡,其辉煌背后隐藏着怎样的隐患;又或许是某个民族或国家,如何在强权的压迫下,寻找并最终实现自我解放的道路。我希望作者能够深入剖析那些决定性的时刻,那些影响历史走向的微小裂痕,以及那些挺身而出、改变命运的个体与群体。这本书,在我看来,绝不仅仅是对过去历史的回顾,更是对当下和未来的一种警示与启示。在全球政治格局日益复杂多变的今天,理解“霸权”的运作逻辑及其“退出”的可能性,显得尤为重要。它或许能帮助我们洞察当今世界存在的种种矛盾与张力,从而更好地理解我们所处的时代。
评分“Exit from Hegemony”——光是这个书名,就足以勾起我内心深处对权力运作以及历史必然性的思索。它似乎预示着一场关于权力结构瓦解与重塑的深刻探讨。我脑海中立刻浮现出无数关于帝国兴衰、大国博弈的历史画面。我想象着,作者会如何剥开层层迷雾,揭示那些看似坚不可摧的霸权背后,究竟隐藏着怎样的内在张力与外部挑战。这“退出”,究竟是一种必然的衰落,还是一种主动的战略转移?它会是经济的衰退、军事的失利,还是文化的影响力减弱?或者,更是一种意识形态的失落,让曾经的领导者失去道义制高点?我尤其好奇,作者会如何描绘那些寻求“退出”的个体、群体或国家,他们是如何在巨大的压力下,寻觅缝隙,积蓄力量,最终实现某种形式的解脱。这本书,在我看来,一定不仅仅是关于历史的叙述,更是一种对权力本质的哲学追问。它或许会挑战我们对“永恒”与“不变”的固有认知,让我们重新审视那些在历史舞台上扮演重要角色的力量。我期待着,它能给我带来一次智识上的涤荡,让我以更宏大的视角,去理解人类文明进程中的那些关键转折。
评分“Exit from Hegemony”——仅仅是这个书名,就足以引发我对历史洪流中权力流动轨迹的无尽遐想。它不仅仅是一个简单的陈述,更像是一种宣言,一种对固有秩序的审视,一种对未来走向的探寻。我迫不及待地想知道,作者将如何描绘那些曾经辉煌的“霸权”是如何一步步走向衰落,或者又如何主动寻求从某种既定的角色中“退出”。这其中,必然牵涉到错综复杂的政治、经济、军事、文化等多重因素的博弈。我期待着,书中能够深入剖析那些决定性的转折点,那些看似不起眼却最终改变历史走向的事件。是内部的腐朽,侵蚀了帝国的根基?还是外部的挑战,打破了原有的平衡?抑或是,是一种新的思想、新的模式的出现,使得旧有的“霸权”模式逐渐失去了其合法性与吸引力?“Exit”这个词,也让我联想到那些试图摆脱束缚、追求独立自主的力量。他们是如何在巨人的阴影下生存,又如何积蓄力量,最终找到自己的出路的?这本书,在我看来,绝非仅仅是对过去的回顾,更是一种对当下世界格局的洞察,它或许能为我们理解当前国际关系的复杂性,以及未来可能出现的权力重组,提供宝贵的启示。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有