What is literature? What is the quality in a text that leads a reader to call it 'literary'? What is the 'certain way' of reading that calls into being the literary potential of a text? Why have we been unable to definitively answer these questions, and where does that leave us? Derek Attridge argues that the impossibility of definition leaves us at a beginning. From the point where literature resists definition, we can begin afresh to explore its workings. Rethinking aspects of the literary that have too long been taken for granted, this volume: considers literature's evasion from definition in light of the practice and institution of Western art; provides a rich new vocabulary for discussions of the literary, reworking such terms as invention, singularity, otherness, alterity, the event, performance and form; returns literature to the realm of ethics, and argues the ethical value of the literary institution to a culture; demonstrates how a new understanding of the literary might be applied in a 'responsible', creative mode of reading. The Singularity of Literature is a brilliant contribution to the theory of literature.
發表於2024-12-27
The Singularity of Literature 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 文學理論 文論 DerekAttridge 學科史 Philosophy LiteraryandCulturalTheory LiteraryTheory
之前閱讀瞭德諾拉的《阿多諾之後》,對其中的“音樂事件”很感興趣。該書講述瞭作為事件的文學,於是趁機閱讀瞭該書。盡管兩者都談論“事件”,多有相似之論,但讀後發現此“事件”非彼“事件”:前者是社會學的,呈現瞭具體的民族誌案例;後者則是文學理論的,思辨色彩濃鬱,相對不太容易理解。前者的提齣,主要是為瞭將審美等因素重新納入社會學的圖景,後者的意圖則還是基本圍繞著“文學性"這個問題。
評分之前閱讀瞭德諾拉的《阿多諾之後》,對其中的“音樂事件”很感興趣。該書講述瞭作為事件的文學,於是趁機閱讀瞭該書。盡管兩者都談論“事件”,多有相似之論,但讀後發現此“事件”非彼“事件”:前者是社會學的,呈現瞭具體的民族誌案例;後者則是文學理論的,思辨色彩濃鬱,相對不太容易理解。前者的提齣,主要是為瞭將審美等因素重新納入社會學的圖景,後者的意圖則還是基本圍繞著“文學性"這個問題。
評分言辭懇切深厚,像一陣清風拂麵。
評分之前閱讀瞭德諾拉的《阿多諾之後》,對其中的“音樂事件”很感興趣。該書講述瞭作為事件的文學,於是趁機閱讀瞭該書。盡管兩者都談論“事件”,多有相似之論,但讀後發現此“事件”非彼“事件”:前者是社會學的,呈現瞭具體的民族誌案例;後者則是文學理論的,思辨色彩濃鬱,相對不太容易理解。前者的提齣,主要是為瞭將審美等因素重新納入社會學的圖景,後者的意圖則還是基本圍繞著“文學性"這個問題。
評分言辭懇切深厚,像一陣清風拂麵。
The Singularity of Literature 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載