Emily Martin (born 1944) is a sinologist, anthropologist, and feminist. Currently, she is a professor of socio-cultural anthropology at New York University. She received her PhD degree from Cornell University in 1971. Before 1984, she published works under the name of Emily Martin Ahern.
As a result of the strength and dominance of the centralized state, ritual action in China often takes its logic from political action. In this book Emily Ahern explores the implications of this. She argues that forms of control attempted ritually on non-human persons (gods and other spirits) in China parallel those forms of control which people regard as effective in ordinary life, namely political control, and draws important conclusions from this. She shows that in China it is possible to discard terms such as ‘magic’, which imply that acts directed to spirits operate on a different basis from acts in ordinary life. She also challenges claims in anthropology that, since they seem arbitrary and the actions of participants in them highly predictable, rituals support established authority. Her book will be of interest not only to specialists in Chinese studies, but to social anthropologists and others interested in the link between ritual and political processes.
我們所說的儀式行為的一些特徵,包括重復、持久的形式、以及參與者應當做什麼和說什麼的準確規範。當動物行為學傢、心理學傢、人類學傢乃至普通人用到這個術語時,其中一些特徵通常會顯現齣來:比如,動物行為學傢提醒我們注意“儀式化”的動物信號形式的固定化和穩定性(Culle...
評分我們所說的儀式行為的一些特徵,包括重復、持久的形式、以及參與者應當做什麼和說什麼的準確規範。當動物行為學傢、心理學傢、人類學傢乃至普通人用到這個術語時,其中一些特徵通常會顯現齣來:比如,動物行為學傢提醒我們注意“儀式化”的動物信號形式的固定化和穩定性(Culle...
評分我們所說的儀式行為的一些特徵,包括重復、持久的形式、以及參與者應當做什麼和說什麼的準確規範。當動物行為學傢、心理學傢、人類學傢乃至普通人用到這個術語時,其中一些特徵通常會顯現齣來:比如,動物行為學傢提醒我們注意“儀式化”的動物信號形式的固定化和穩定性(Culle...
評分我們所說的儀式行為的一些特徵,包括重復、持久的形式、以及參與者應當做什麼和說什麼的準確規範。當動物行為學傢、心理學傢、人類學傢乃至普通人用到這個術語時,其中一些特徵通常會顯現齣來:比如,動物行為學傢提醒我們注意“儀式化”的動物信號形式的固定化和穩定性(Culle...
評分我們所說的儀式行為的一些特徵,包括重復、持久的形式、以及參與者應當做什麼和說什麼的準確規範。當動物行為學傢、心理學傢、人類學傢乃至普通人用到這個術語時,其中一些特徵通常會顯現齣來:比如,動物行為學傢提醒我們注意“儀式化”的動物信號形式的固定化和穩定性(Culle...
不是很同意她對中國人祖先崇拜那種功利主義的解釋
评分研究的論證材料和寫作的手法都讓我不太滿意。盡管她是談儀式,但是也就是泛泛地談,並沒有詳細記錄,感覺田野簡陋瞭。對清朝東南中國的資料全部都是西人記錄的引述,沒有中國的曆史文獻???可能她不懂中文???666。不過理論上還是有點啓發,譬如open&closed rituals的分類。
评分P31 "we find that rituals can still involve the exercise of control over others and that rituals can still be analyzed in the same fashion as interactions in ordinary life." 但是儀式不僅僅是政治權利的延生或鏡像,不是麼?
评分翻瞭下 有用再細讀好瞭。
评分不是很同意她對中國人祖先崇拜那種功利主義的解釋
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有