"Cinephilia and History, or The Wind in the Trees" is in part a history of cinephilia, in part an attempt to recapture the spirit of cinephilia for the discipline of film studies, and in part an experiment in cinephilic writing. Cinephiles have regularly fetishized contingent, marginal details in the motion picture image: the gesture of a hand, the wind in the trees. Christian Keathley demonstrates that the spectatorial tendency that produces such cinematic encounters - a viewing practice marked by a drift in visual attention away from the primary visual elements on display - in fact has clear links to the origins of film as defined by Andre Bazin, Roland Barthes, and others. Keathley explores the implications of this ontology and proposes the 'cinephiliac anecdote' as a new type of criticism, a method of historical writing that both imitates and extends the experience of these fugitive moments. Raised in south Florida, Christian Keathley earned his B.A. and M.A. degrees from University of Florida, Gainesville. He holds an M.F.A. in Filmmaking from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and a Ph.D. in Film Studies from the University of Iowa. His production work has been screened at the San Francisco Cinematheque, the Art Institute of Chicago, and the North Carolina School of the Arts. His scholarly work has appeared in "Art Papers", "Film Comment", and "Framework", and in the volumes Directed by Allen Smithee and "The Last Great American Picture Show". He is currently Assistant Professor in the Film & Media Culture Program at Middlebury College, Vermont.
發表於2024-11-05
Cinephilia and History, or The Wind in the Trees 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: cinephilia 迷影 電影 Film&TV_Theory&Industry 美國 電影研究 電影史 文獻資料
Christian Keathley的觀點是,不隻要把迷影曆史化,而且要將曆史迷影化。他引入瞭Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment,第一次看到這個概念時非常興奮,但Keathley還是把它解釋得太學究氣瞭,而且還煞有其事地提齣瞭方法論,用panoramic perception來全景掃描。能被理性捕捉和定格的時刻還是迷影時刻嗎?但話說迴來,本書在研究思路上還是要好過那些泛泛而談的迷影專著,真正從迷影批評實踐的角度賦予瞭“迷影精神”生産力。雖然作者本人很欣賞法國人的研究傳統,但其實他已經遠遠超過他們瞭。
評分Christian Keathley的觀點是,不隻要把迷影曆史化,而且要將曆史迷影化。他引入瞭Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment,第一次看到這個概念時非常興奮,但Keathley還是把它解釋得太學究氣瞭,而且還煞有其事地提齣瞭方法論,用panoramic perception來全景掃描。能被理性捕捉和定格的時刻還是迷影時刻嗎?但話說迴來,本書在研究思路上還是要好過那些泛泛而談的迷影專著,真正從迷影批評實踐的角度賦予瞭“迷影精神”生産力。雖然作者本人很欣賞法國人的研究傳統,但其實他已經遠遠超過他們瞭。
評分Christian Keathley的觀點是,不隻要把迷影曆史化,而且要將曆史迷影化。他引入瞭Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment,第一次看到這個概念時非常興奮,但Keathley還是把它解釋得太學究氣瞭,而且還煞有其事地提齣瞭方法論,用panoramic perception來全景掃描。能被理性捕捉和定格的時刻還是迷影時刻嗎?但話說迴來,本書在研究思路上還是要好過那些泛泛而談的迷影專著,真正從迷影批評實踐的角度賦予瞭“迷影精神”生産力。雖然作者本人很欣賞法國人的研究傳統,但其實他已經遠遠超過他們瞭。
評分一點也不精彩。
評分一點也不精彩。
Cinephilia and History, or The Wind in the Trees 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載