In Defense of Food

迈克尔•波伦（Michael Pollan）美国首屈一指的饮食作家，其作品多次获得具有“美食奥斯卡”之称的詹姆斯•比尔德奖。2009年获选《新闻周刊》十大思想领袖，2010年被《时代》周刊评为“全球百位影响力人物”，2013年被《时代》周刊评选为“食物之神”。代表作《杂食者的两难》《烹》《为食物辩护》《吃的法则》至今仍是饮食写作的典范。现任加州大学伯克利分校的新闻学教授及科学和环境新闻学奈特项目的主任，但迈克尔•波伦更像是一位热爱田野调查的美食侦探，从农场到超市，再到制作出各种美食的厨房，研究食物从产地到餐桌的过程，同时对饮食文化背后的人类社会困境进行思考。他也是自然爱好者，他将走访田园的体验化作优美而幽默的文字，为工业化食物链下的人类，指出一条古朴、美好且真实可行的路。

出版者:Large Print Pr

作者:Michael Pollan

页数:329

出版时间:2009-5-21

价格:USD 16.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9781594133329

What to eat, what not to eat, and how to think about health: a manifesto for our times "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These simple words go to the heart of Michael Pollan's "In Defense of Food," the well-considered answers he provides to the questions posed in the bestselling "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Humans used to know how to eat well, Pollan argues. But the balanced dietary lessons that were once passed down through generations have been confused, complicated, and distorted by food industry marketers, nutritional scientists, and journalists-all of whom have much to gain from our dietary confusion. As a result, we face today a complex culinary landscape dense with bad advice and foods that are not "real." These "edible foodlike substances" are often packaged with labels bearing health claims that are typically false or misleading. Indeed, real food is fast disappearing from the marketplace, to be replaced by "nutrients," and plain old eating by an obsession with nutrition that is, paradoxically, ruining our health, not to mention our meals. Michael Pollan's sensible and decidedly counterintuitive advice is: "Don't eat anything that your great-great grandmother would not recognize as food." Writing "In Defense of Food," and affirming the joy of eating, Pollan suggests that if we would pay more for better, well-grown food, but buy less of it, we'll benefit ourselves, our communities, and the environment at large. Taking a clear-eyed look at what science does and does not know about the links between diet and health, he proposes a new way to think about the question of what to eat that is informed by ecology and tradition rather than by the prevailing nutrient-by-nutrientapproach. "In Defense of Food" reminds us that, despite the daunting dietary landscape Americans confront in the modern supermarket, the solutions to the current omnivore's dilemma can be found all around us. In looking toward traditional diets the world over, as well as the foods our families-and regions-historically enjoyed, we can recover a more balanced, reasonable, and pleasurable approach to food. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we might start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives and enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy.

读后感

《食物无罪》 麦可·波伦 “营养”这个词现在已经无人不知无孔不入了，一个没多少文化知识的农村老头老太也能告诉你：“我们吃得很营养，我们每顿都在吃肉，很多蛋白质！” 究竟发生了什么，使得地球最遥远的角落、从来没学习过有机化学的人，都着魔似地念念有词。更别提...  

作者认为源于清教徒的美国上流社会将从美食中获取感官享受视如性欲会将人与动物联系起来，吃作为一种赤裸裸的行为不应得到放任，追求烹饪的目的比满足食欲和口福要高尚的多。所以美国人对外来移民一大块动物蛋白加上几种蔬菜一锅炖的饮食尤为反感。于是借助营养主义者之手，通...  

同意论点，完全不同意论据和辩论方式。 的确如作者所说，现在营养学的研究有很多弊端。他攻击的几种，比如over simplification, failure to address confounder的确是主流研究里面非常常见的。 但是啊，他用来当作证据的内容，suffers from exactly the same fallacy in desi...  

今天上课,班里的美国朋友推荐我读的 她正好要去图书馆还这本书,我就正好去图书馆借过来 写的非常棒 让我重新审视自己的饮食了.