Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-27

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 电子书的读者还喜欢

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Don Bates

出品人:

页数:384

译者:

出版时间:1995-11-24

价格:USD 43.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780521499750

丛书系列:

图书标签: 科学史翻过感兴趣

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

However much the three great traditions of medicine - Galenic, Chinese and Ayurvedic - differed from each other, they had one thing in common: scholarship. The foundational knowledge of each could only be acquired by careful study under teachers relying on ancient texts. Such medical knowledge is special, operating as it does in the realm of the most fundamental human experiences - health, disease, suffering, birth and death - and the credibility of healers is of crucial importance. Because of this, scholarly medical knowledge offers a rich field for the study of different cultural practices in the legitimation of knowledge generally. The contributors to this volume are all specialists in the history or anthropology of these traditions, and their essays range from historical investigations to studies of present-day practices.

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

将近二十年前的会议论文集了，看学术脉络如何从争论epistemology能否跨文化比较，发展到Sivin和Lloyd去用“文化簇”硬比，而另外一些人的兴趣转到感观经验与文本传统之间的关系，更有人直接走到“学习”这件事本身的制度和实践层面去。Amos Funkenstein关于学科性的点评很给力。总可以想一想：如果我今天的工作放到当时去，他们会如何界定和评论？

评分☆☆☆☆☆