发表于2024-12-27
Curriculum or Craftsmanship 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 教育社会学 学校组织
Sociologist Harry L. Gracey spent two years studying an East-Coast school system, which he calls "Brookview," and determined that the bureaucratic social structure of schools can have a profound and irreversibly negative effect on the creativity of teachers. This volume tells the story of the "Wilbur Wright" elementary school in Brookview. It examines the relationship between the educational institution as a bureaucracy and the goals of the two main types of teaching orientation found in elementary schools such as Wright.
The majority of teachers are "production" oriented. They believe that their job is to see that the children in their charge complete as much of the standardized grade level curriculum as possible during the school year. They do achieve some success in preparing children for life in a society where bureaucracy is the dominant form of social organization.
The other significant type of teaching orientation is that of the "craftsmen." These instructors see their goal as the development of each individual's learning potential, with the curriculum built upon the specific needs and interests of each child. Bureaucratic school structures do nothing to promote this kind of teaching.
Any ideas that are at variance with the school's organizational structure will fail. The craftsman teachers do not have the time to communicate the standardized programs desired by the school board and also to make use of their own individualistic techniques. Further, the continued use of the former cancels the effects of the craftsman approach.
In delineating his conclusions, Professor Gracey includes his observations on the community and educational setting of the study, the two types of teachers, the administration, the parents, and the children's response to educational organization.
This study is unique in approaching its educational subject matter from a sociological point of view; Professor Gracey intended it as a study of behavior in organizations. It should also serve educational goals, however, and will therefore interest educators and concerned citizens as well as sociologists.
写于60年代晚期的学校观察,把教师分成两类,手艺人 craftsman和 流水线工人production teacher,然后探讨学校组织如何影响不同类型教师教学。结论就是美国的中小学是「工业式的」,导致手艺人型的教师(注重个性、全面成长)纷纷不适应,纷纷投降或者离开了学校体系。没什么理论,基本上现在研究生论文的水准吧。
评分写于60年代晚期的学校观察,把教师分成两类,手艺人 craftsman和 流水线工人production teacher,然后探讨学校组织如何影响不同类型教师教学。结论就是美国的中小学是「工业式的」,导致手艺人型的教师(注重个性、全面成长)纷纷不适应,纷纷投降或者离开了学校体系。没什么理论,基本上现在研究生论文的水准吧。
评分写于60年代晚期的学校观察,把教师分成两类,手艺人 craftsman和 流水线工人production teacher,然后探讨学校组织如何影响不同类型教师教学。结论就是美国的中小学是「工业式的」,导致手艺人型的教师(注重个性、全面成长)纷纷不适应,纷纷投降或者离开了学校体系。没什么理论,基本上现在研究生论文的水准吧。
评分写于60年代晚期的学校观察,把教师分成两类,手艺人 craftsman和 流水线工人production teacher,然后探讨学校组织如何影响不同类型教师教学。结论就是美国的中小学是「工业式的」,导致手艺人型的教师(注重个性、全面成长)纷纷不适应,纷纷投降或者离开了学校体系。没什么理论,基本上现在研究生论文的水准吧。
评分写于60年代晚期的学校观察,把教师分成两类,手艺人 craftsman和 流水线工人production teacher,然后探讨学校组织如何影响不同类型教师教学。结论就是美国的中小学是「工业式的」,导致手艺人型的教师(注重个性、全面成长)纷纷不适应,纷纷投降或者离开了学校体系。没什么理论,基本上现在研究生论文的水准吧。
Curriculum or Craftsmanship 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书