Makers and Takers

Makers and Takers pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Doubleday Books
作者:Peter Schweizer
出品人:
页数:272
译者:
出版时间:2008-6-3
价格:GBP 19.15
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780385513500
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 经济学
  • 金融
  • 财富
  • 不平等
  • 阶级
  • 社会
  • 投资
  • 商业
  • 权力
  • 美国社会
想要找书就要到 本本书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

In Makers and Takers you will discover why:

* Seventy-one percent of conservatives say you have an obligation to care for a seriously injured spouse or parent versus less than half (46 percent) of liberals.

* Conservatives have a better work ethic and are much less likely to call in sick than their liberal counterparts.

* Liberals are 2½ times more likely to be resentful of others’ success and 50 percent more likely to be jealous of other people’s good luck.

* Liberals are 2 times more likely to say it is okay to cheat the government out of welfare money you don’t deserve.

* Conservatives are more likely than liberals to hug their children and “significantly more likely” to display positive nurturing emotions.

* Liberals are less trusting of family members and much less likely to stay in touch with their parents.

* Do you get satisfaction from putting someone else’s happiness ahead of your own? Fifty-five percent of conservatives said yes versus only 20 percent of liberals.

* Rush Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan, Bill O’Reilly and Dick Cheney have given large sums of money to people in need, while Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Michael Moore, and Al Gore have not.

* Those who are “very liberal” are 3 times more likely than conservatives to throw things when they get angry. The American left prides itself on being superior to conservatives: more generous, less materialistic, more tolerant, more intellectual, and more selfless. For years scholars have constructed—and the media has pushed—elaborate theories designed to demonstrate that conservatives suffer from a host of personality defects and character flaws. According to these supposedly unbiased studies, conservatives are mean-spirited, greedy, selfish malcontents with authoritarian tendencies. Far from the belief of a few cranks, prominent liberals from John Kenneth Galbraith to Hillary Clinton have succumbed to these prejudices. But what do the facts show?

Peter Schweizer has dug deep—through tax documents, scholarly data, primary opinion research surveys, and private records—and has discovered that these claims are a myth. Indeed, he shows that many of these claims actually apply more to liberals than conservatives. Much as he did in his bestseller Do as I Say (Not as I Do) , he brings to light never-before-revealed facts that will upset conventional wisdom.

Conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Robert Bork have long argued that liberal policies promote social decay. Schweizer, using the latest data and research, exposes how, in general:

* Liberals are more self-centered than conservatives.

* Conservatives are more generous and charitable than liberals.

* Liberals are more envious and less hardworking than conservatives.

* Conservatives value truth more than liberals, and are less prone to cheating and lying.

* Liberals are more angry than conservatives.

* Conservatives are actually more knowledgeable than liberals.

* Liberals are more dissatisfied and unhappy than conservatives.

Schweizer argues that the failure lies in modern liberal ideas, which foster a self-centered, “if it feels good do it” attitude that leads liberals to outsource their responsibilities to the government and focus instead on themselves and their own desires.

探寻现代社会结构与个体命运的宏大叙事 一部剖析权力、财富与社会契约的深度力作 本书以磅礴的笔触,深入解构了现代社会运行的核心机制,探讨了资源分配、价值创造与权力结构之间错综复杂的联系。它并非一本关于具体事件或人物的编年史,而是一部旨在揭示隐藏在日常表象之下的、驱动历史演进的底层逻辑的理论与观察的集合体。 第一部分:价值的迷雾——生产、分配与符号的重塑 在物质生产效率空前提高的今天,社会的财富分配机制却日益呈现出两极分化的趋势。本书首先聚焦于“价值”的嬗变。传统的劳动价值论在金融化、信息化的浪潮下受到了前所未有的挑战。作者认为,价值的创造已不再仅仅依赖于可触摸的物质投入,更依赖于对稀缺资源的控制、信息流的掌握,以及对社会共识和符号的构建能力。 我们详细考察了技术进步如何重塑了生产力,以及这种重塑如何不成比例地惠及了少数掌握平台和算法的群体。书中通过一系列跨学科的案例分析——从后工业时代的知识产权壁垒到数字经济中的“赢者通吃”效应——描绘了财富从实体经济向虚拟经济迁移的复杂路径。特别值得一提的是,作者对“注意力经济”进行了深刻的剖析,指出在信息爆炸的时代,注意力本身成为了一种被精确量化和交易的稀缺资源,其分配不均直接反映和加剧了社会地位的固化。 第二部分:契约的边界——治理、合法性与失衡的权力 社会秩序的维系依赖于一套被广泛接受的“社会契约”。然而,随着全球化和技术渗透的加深,这份古老的契约正在遭受严峻的考验。本书的第二部分将目光投向了治理结构及其合法性基础。 作者区分了不同类型的权力:制度性权力(如政府机构)、经济性权力(如跨国资本)和话语权(如媒体与文化机构)。本书深入探讨了这些权力实体如何在看似透明的民主框架下运作,以及它们如何通过制定规则、解释现实来巩固自身地位。我们细致分析了监管套利(Regulatory Arbitrage)在国际资本流动中的作用,它如何使得资本的逐利行为能够绕开地方性的社会责任要求。 同时,书中也探讨了“合法性危机”。当普通民众感觉自己的贡献与回报不成比例,或者发现既定的规则系统性地偏向某一群体时,对现有制度的信任便会瓦解。这不仅仅是政治上的不满,更是对社会公正原则的深层质疑。作者通过对历史周期中“精英俘获”现象的梳理,警示了权力自我强化的危险路径。 第三部分:存在的代价——个体能动性与结构性约束 在宏大的社会结构分析之下,本书并未忽视个体在其中的挣扎与选择。第三部分着重探讨了在高度结构化的现代社会中,个体的“能动性”究竟能在多大程度上对抗结构性的限制。 本书引入了“机会成本的异化”这一概念,用以描述在高度竞争的环境中,个体被迫做出的选择往往是被结构预设好的。例如,教育的本质从知识传递异化为筛选精英的工具,迫使家庭投入巨大资源以确保子女能在这一筛选机制中存活下来,从而进一步巩固了阶层固化。 我们还探讨了身份政治与经济焦虑的交织。在经济基础动摇的背景下,人们更容易转向基于身份认同的叙事寻求慰藉和归属感。作者审慎地评估了这种转向对社会团结的潜在影响,以及它如何被用来转移对根本性经济不平等的关注。 此外,书中对“努力的悖论”进行了深入反思:在系统性优势面前,纯粹的个人努力是否已成为一种过时的道德教条?作者没有给出简单的答案,而是引导读者思考,在承认结构性障碍的同时,如何重新定义和实践有意义的行动。 结语:重构未来——对社会想象力的呼唤 全书的论证指向一个核心问题:我们能否设计出一种更具包容性、更公平的社会契约,以适应二十一世纪的技术和经济现实?本书拒绝提供简单的乌托邦蓝图,而是主张,真正的改变始于对现有系统运作逻辑的清醒认知。它呼吁社会精英、政策制定者以及每一个公民,超越既有的意识形态框架,重新审视价值的本质、权力的边界,以及我们作为社会共同体所承担的责任。 本书为那些渴望穿透复杂现象、理解当代社会深层脉络的读者,提供了一套严谨而富有洞察力的分析工具。它是一场关于我们如何走到今天,以及我们该如何决定未来的思想探险。

作者简介

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有