This provocative volume of essays is now available in paperback. The contributors to this volume - musicologists, sociologists, cultural theorists - all challenge the view that music occupies an autonomous aesthetic sphere. Recently, socially and politically grounded enterprises such as feminism, semiotics and deconstruction have effected a major transformation in the ways in which the arts and humanities are studied, leading in turn to a systematic investigation of the implicit assumptions underlying the critical methods of the last two hundred years. Influenced by these approaches, the writers here question a prevailing ideology that insists there is a division between music and society and examine the ways in which the two do in fact interact and mediate one another within and across socio-cultural boundaries.
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?
评分Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?
评分Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?
评分Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?
评分Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有