黃宗智，美籍華人。普林斯頓大學學士，華盛頓大學博士。自1966年畢業起即供職於加利福尼亞大學洛杉磯校區曆史係，並因其在中國農村經濟史研究方麵有卓越貢獻於1991年榮升“超級教授”。其後，轉嚮法律史研究，再次發錶兩部開創性專著。1975年創辦季刊《近現代中國》(Modern China)，乃美國研究中國首要學術刊物之一。2003年在國內創辦《中國鄉村研究》學刊。2005年受聘為人民大學農業與農村發展學院國傢教育部“長江學者奬勵計劃講座教授”；同時，擔任清華大學人文與社會高等研究中心高級研究員。最近幾年多用中文寫作，發錶論文多篇。主要著作有《法律、習俗、與司法實踐：清代與民國的比較》、《清代的法律、社會、與文化：民法的錶達與實踐》、《中國研究的規範認識危機》、《長江三角洲的小農傢庭與鄉村發展》、《華北的小農經濟與社會變遷》以及此集所收論文。

The culmination of twenty years of research, this essential book completes distinguished historian Philip C. C. Huang's pathbreaking trilogy on Chinese law and society from late imperial times to the present. Huang shows how, at the level of ideology and theory, traditional Chinese law has been rejected time and again in the past century by China's own lawmakers, first in the late Qing and the republic, then in the revolutionary and Maoist periods of the People's Republic, and finally again in the current reform era. Considering legal theory alone, modern Chinese law can only be Western law, and past Chinese law-traditional or Maoist-can have no role under the leadership's current preoccupations with modernization and marketization. But what has actually happened historically at the level of judicial practice and the daily lives of common people? In exploring this central question, Huang draws on a rich array of court records and field interviews to illustrate the surprising strength of traditional Chinese civil justice. Albeit much altered, its legacy can be traced in informal and semiformal community justice (e.g., societal and cadres mediation), as well as in multiple spheres of court-administered formal civil justice, including property rights, inheritance and old-age maintenance, and debt obligations. He also identifies the influence of Maoist justice, especially its divorce and civil court mediation practices. Finally, despite the reform era's massive importation of Western laws, legal reasoning employed in judicial practice has shown remarkable continuity, with major implications for China's future legal system.