In the first essay, Habermas himself succinctly presents the centerpiece of his theory: his proceduralist paradigm of law. The following essays comprise elaborations, criticisms, and further explorations by others of the most salient issues addressed in his theory. The distinguished group of contributors--internationally prominent scholars in the fields of law, philosophy, and social theory--includes many who have been closely identified with Habermas as well as some of his best-known critics. The final essay is a thorough and lengthy reply by Habermas, which not only engages the most important arguments raised in the preceding essays but also further elaborates and refines some of his own key contributions in Between Facts and Norms. This volume will be essential reading for philosophers, legal scholars, and political and social theorists concerned with understanding the work of one of the leading philosophers of our age. These provocative, in-depth debates between Jurgen Habermas and a wide range of his critics relate to the philosopher's contribution to legal and democratic theory in his recently published Between Facts and Norms. Drawing upon his discourse theory, Habermas has elaborated a novel and powerful account of law that purports to bridge the gap between democracy and rights, by conceiving law to be at once self-imposed and binding.
In the first essay, Habermas himself succinctly presents the centerpiece of his theory: his proceduralist paradigm of law. The following essays comprise elaborations, criticisms, and further explorations by others of the most salient issues addressed in his theory. The distinguished group of contributors--internationally prominent scholars in the fields of law, philosophy, and social theory--includes many who have been closely identified with Habermas as well as some of his best-known critics. The final essay is a thorough and lengthy reply by Habermas, which not only engages the most important arguments raised in the preceding essays but also further elaborates and refines some of his own key contributions in Between Facts and Norms. This volume will be essential reading for philosophers, legal scholars, and political and social theorists concerned with understanding the work of one of the leading philosophers of our age.
These provocative, in-depth debates between Jürgen Habermas and a wide range of his critics relate to the philosopher's contribution to legal and democratic theory in his recently published Between Facts and Norms. Drawing upon his discourse theory, Habermas has elaborated a novel and powerful account of law that purports to bridge the gap between democracy and rights, by conceiving law to be at once self-imposed and binding.
Michel Rosenfeldis Professor of Law at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and author of Affirmative Action and Justice (1991) and Just Interpretations: Law between Ethics and Politics (California, 1998). Andrew Arato is Professor of Sociology in the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Research and most recently co-author of Civil Society (1994).
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书在结构上展现出一种令人惊叹的内在一致性。它不是简单地将几个不相关的理论碎片堆砌起来,而是像建造一座精密的哥特式大教堂,每一个支撑点、每一根飞扶壁都有其不可替代的功能,共同支撑起整个宏伟的穹顶。作者似乎对“整体性”有着近乎偏执的追求,总能将那些看似分散的社会现象或哲学思辨,巧妙地编织进他宏大的理论网络之中。对于我这样的非专业读者而言,理解其复杂的术语系统本身就是一项挑战,但作者在引入新概念时,总会适时地提供历史的参照点或逻辑的过渡环节,这在很大程度上缓和了理论的陡峭性。我留意到,某些段落的论述力度极强,仿佛是作者毕生的心血凝结而成,读起来让人有一种莫名的敬畏感。这本书的价值,或许并不在于提供一个现成的答案,而在于它提供了一种看待世界提问的方式,一种更加深刻、更具批判性的视角,这比任何结论性的论断都来得更为宝贵和持久。
评分这本书的装帧设计着实令人眼前一亮,那种沉稳的墨绿色配上烫金的字体,透着一股学究式的庄重感,让人一拿在手就知道这不是一本轻松的读物。我特别喜欢封面排版的那种古典与现代交织的平衡感,没有过度花哨的装饰,完全聚焦于文字的力量。初翻目录时,那些术语的密集程度就让我倒吸一口冷气,每一个标题都像是一个精心构建的哲学迷宫的入口。我原本以为会是一本晦涩难懂的理论汇编,但深入阅读后发现,作者在梳理这些宏大议题时,那种严谨的逻辑推进和对历史脉络的梳理,确实展现了大家风范。它不是那种让你读完就能立刻“掌握”的快餐读物,更像是一块需要反复咀嚼、细细品味的硬糖,每一次品尝都能从中咂摸出新的滋味。对于一个对现代社会理论抱有浓厚兴趣的读者来说,这本书无疑提供了一个极具深度的切入点,它挑战你固有的认知框架,迫使你重新审视那些被我们视为理所当然的社会结构。那种智力上的高强度投入,虽然过程略显艰辛,但最终带来的洞察感是极其令人满足的。
评分阅读这本书的过程,与其说是“阅读”,不如说是一场与作者进行的高密度智力对话。我发现自己不得不频繁地停下来,合上书本,在房间里踱步沉思。作者在构建其理论体系时,那种对概念的界定和推演的细致入微,简直到了吹毛求疵的地步,但恰恰是这种极致的精确性,使得整本书的论证基石异常稳固。我尤其欣赏作者在处理那些具有高度争议性的议题时所表现出的那种不动声色的批判力量——他不是那种高声叫嚷的评论家,而是像一位冷静的外科医生,用最锋利的解剖刀剖开问题的核心,将复杂性清晰地呈现在读者面前。这本书的行文节奏是内敛而有力的,它不迎合读者的阅读习惯,而是要求读者主动适应它的节奏。读到某个关键转折点时,我感觉自己像是爬上了一个陡峭的山坡,虽然气喘吁吁,但一旦站稳,眼前的视野便豁然开朗,看到了以往被低矮的视角所遮蔽的广阔图景。这是一种非常“锻炼心智”的体验,让人在合书时,感觉自己对世界运转的理解深度上了一个台阶。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读体验是“奢侈”的,它需要你投入大量的时间和心力,绝不是那种可以在通勤路上囫囵吞枣的休闲读物。它的语言风格是高度凝练的,常常一个长句中就包含了多重从句和嵌套的逻辑关系,这要求读者必须保持高度的专注力,稍有走神,就可能错失一个至关重要的逻辑跳跃。然而,正是这种对阅读耐心的“考验”,带来了极大的回报。当我终于理清了书中某个核心概念的来龙去脉后,那种豁然开朗的喜悦感,是其他通俗读物难以比拟的。更吸引我的是,作者似乎有一种预判性,能够预见到读者可能会产生的常见误解或反驳,并提前在论证中加以消解或限定。这使得全书的论述显得密不透风,几乎找不到可以轻易攻破的薄弱环节。这本书更像是写给那些愿意“受苦”以求得真知的人士的一封长信,它要求的不只是理解,更是深层次的共鸣与接受。
评分这本书的出版形式,从纸张的触感到油墨的气味,都传递出一种对知识的尊重。我个人非常看重书籍的物理质感,而这本选用的纸张厚实,印刷清晰,即便是长时间阅读也不会感到眼睛疲劳。抛开那些高深的理论不谈,仅从学术著作的“典藏价值”来看,它也绝对是值得购入的。内容上,作者对现代社会运作机制的剖析,其穿透力是惊人的,他没有停留在表面的现象描述,而是深入到权力运作、规范建构的底层逻辑之中。在阅读过程中,我不断地将书中的观点与我日常观察到的社会现象进行对比印证,每一次对比都加深了我对书中论述的理解,也让我对现实世界多了一层更为冷静和审慎的认识。这本书的价值,在于它提供了一副极度清晰的“X光眼镜”,让我们能够透视社会表象下的复杂肌理,并思考我们个体在这一结构中应如何自处。对于任何严肃的社会思辨者来说,这都是一本绕不开的案头必备之作。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有