Karl N. Llewellyn (1893-1962) was professor at the University of Chicago Law School. His work focused mostly on the topic of legal realism. In addition to this title he is the author of The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study, The Cheyenne Way, The Common Law Tradition-Deciding Appeals, and The Case Law System in America.
Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice compiles many of Llewellynas most important writings. For his time, the thirties through the fifties, Llewellyn offered fresh approaches to the study of law and society. Although these writings might not seem innovative today, because they have become widely applied in the contemporary world, they remain a testament to his. The ideas he advanced many decades ago have now become commonplace among contemporary jurisprudence scholars as well as social scientists studying law and legal issues. Legal realism, the ground of Llewellynas theory, attempts to contextualize the practice of law. Its proponents argue that a host of extra-legal factors-social, cultural, historical, and psychological, to name a few-are at least as important in determining legal outcomes as are the rules and principles by which the legal system operates. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., book, The Common Law, is regarded as the founder of legal realism. Holmes stated that in order to truly understand the workings of law, one must go beyond technical (or logical) elements entailing rules and procedures. The life of the law is not only that which is embodied in statutes and court decisions guided by procedural law. Law is just as much about experience: about flesh-and-blood human beings doings things together and making decisions. Llewellynas version of legal realism was heavily influenced by Pound and Holmes. The distinction between "law in books" and "law in action" is an acknowledgement of the gap that exists between law as embodied in criminal, civil, and administrative code books, and law. A fully formed legal realism insists on studying the behavior of legal practitioners, including their practices, habits, and techniques of action as well as decision-making about others. This classic studyis a foremosthistorical work on legal theory, and is essential for understanding the roots of this influential perspective.
發表於2024-11-30
Jurisprudence 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 現實主義
隻讀瞭1237,13,15,17七篇文章。盧埃林對於法律人作為法律理論的擔綱者/主體的認識,時至今日仍舊是超前的。將理論視角從規則轉嚮事實,從法律製度、體係、裁判方法,轉嚮進行法律解釋和裁判的人及其craft,這在當代法哲學主流討論中基本已經消失瞭。
評分隻讀瞭1237,13,15,17七篇文章。盧埃林對於法律人作為法律理論的擔綱者/主體的認識,時至今日仍舊是超前的。將理論視角從規則轉嚮事實,從法律製度、體係、裁判方法,轉嚮進行法律解釋和裁判的人及其craft,這在當代法哲學主流討論中基本已經消失瞭。
評分隻讀瞭1237,13,15,17七篇文章。盧埃林對於法律人作為法律理論的擔綱者/主體的認識,時至今日仍舊是超前的。將理論視角從規則轉嚮事實,從法律製度、體係、裁判方法,轉嚮進行法律解釋和裁判的人及其craft,這在當代法哲學主流討論中基本已經消失瞭。
評分隻讀瞭1237,13,15,17七篇文章。盧埃林對於法律人作為法律理論的擔綱者/主體的認識,時至今日仍舊是超前的。將理論視角從規則轉嚮事實,從法律製度、體係、裁判方法,轉嚮進行法律解釋和裁判的人及其craft,這在當代法哲學主流討論中基本已經消失瞭。
評分隻讀瞭1237,13,15,17七篇文章。盧埃林對於法律人作為法律理論的擔綱者/主體的認識,時至今日仍舊是超前的。將理論視角從規則轉嚮事實,從法律製度、體係、裁判方法,轉嚮進行法律解釋和裁判的人及其craft,這在當代法哲學主流討論中基本已經消失瞭。
Jurisprudence 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載