E.J.米香(E.J.Mishan)著名的反傳統經濟學傢，曾執教於倫敦經濟學院，同時被北美多所頂級大學聘為客座教授。他挑戰、擊碎瞭右派和左派們死死抱守的一些固有信念，諸如右派認為的“自由貿易、共同市場是最好的經濟安排”，左派認為的“工廠倒閉會導緻失業”、“男女工資差異就意味著性彆歧視”等。他打破瞭長期以來人們所公認的一些觀點，諸如“經濟增長必然帶來生活水準的提高”。

米香著有《經濟增長的代價》、《成本效益分析》等著作。他在《經濟學人》、《美國經濟評論》、《政治經濟學雜誌》等權威雜誌以及《金融時報》、《每日電訊》、《紐約時報》等報紙上發錶論文80多篇。

In an impeccably argued work, a venerable economist examines commonly held beliefs about the economy and how it works. E. J. Mishan, an iconoclastic economist who has taught at such schools as the London School of Economics and the New School for Social Research, is in this volume a provocateur, smashing staunchly held beliefs of the right (free trade and common markets are good for the economy), and the left (local jobs are always lost when factories close down, pay disparity between men and women signifies discrimination). He also pokes holes in the accepted wisdom held by all, arguing for example that economic growth does not necessarily improve lives. Those who believe the fallacies the author exposes to the light of reason in this book are, however, neither ignorant nor careless. The fallacies are all plausible, and intelligent people can be forgiven for believing them. The author's scintillating text is apolitical. In arguing that immigration does not benefit a country's economy, for example, he is not arguing in favour of restricting immigration. Rather, his goal is to test the assumptions behind the dearly held positions of both the left and the right or to expose what he calls the 'breathtaking fatuity' that counts as wisdom these days. He wants to interject common sense and logic into today's debates over the economy and, especially, the political arguments that translate into legislation that has a negative impact on people. E.J. Mishan's ideas breathe new life into debates gone stale by ideology. As he notes, the fallacies in this volume travel in the 'highest circles', from debates in Congress to the pages of the "Wall Street Journal", "Time", and "The Economist". Most are things 'everybody knows'. He hopes, therefore, to 'expose the concerned citizen to the shock-treatment of discovering that much of what passes for conventional economic wisdom is in fact fallacious'.