Tort Law provides a different approach to the study of tort. Written with students firmly in mind, it presents an engaging and accessible yet thought-provoking and critical account. Its analytical approach locates the law in its political and socio-legal context, exploring both practical and theoretical problems. The book's innovative use of pedagogical features (including 'pause for reflection' boxes and 'counterpoint' boxes) encourages students to engage with debates about the way tort law is and how it could be. Case boxes reflect the case-driven nature of tort, ensuring students are clear about the black-letter law. Chapter-opening problem questions are used to place the law in its practical context and to illustrate how to apply the theory. Annotated versions of the problem questions are placed at the back of the book to give students pointers on how to answer them, and outline answers are housed on the book's accompanying Online Resource Centre. Tort Law also provides diagrams and tables where relevant; chapter summaries; end-of-chapter questions; and annotated lists of further reading. The authors' conversational and lively writing style engages students in the study of this essential subject. This text is divided into six parts: Introduction to tort, Negligence, Special liability regimes, Personal torts, Land torts and Damages and the purpose of compensation. Tort Law is fully up to date and includes recent cases and developments such as: - House of Lords decisions in Barker v Corus [2006]; Customs & Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank [2006]; Grieves v FT Everard [2007]; A v Hoare [2008]; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008]; and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary [2008] - Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Express Newspapers Plc [2008] - Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] - Compensation Act 2006. The book will benefit anyone seeking a fresh and stimulating account of tort law and will be essential reading for students studying tort at degree level or for the CPE/Diploma in Law. Online Resource Centre Tort Law is accompanied by an Online Resource Centre (www.oxfordtextbooks.co.uk/orc/horsey) which includes the following features: Twice-yearly updates to changes in cases and legislation. Extensive question material including: - Outline answers to chapter-opening problem questions - Guidance on how to answer selected end-of-chapter questions, including outline answer to one essay question from each chapter - Pointers to questions at the end of selected 'pause for reflection' and 'counterpoint' boxes - General guidance on how to answer problem questions and essays. Further judgments annotated with explanatory notes and points for students to consider. This innovative resource helps students to develop the skills of reading and analysing judgments. Annotated web links to external web resources including audiovisual news clips (e.g. BBC news report on the Hillsborough stadium disaster in the psychiatric harm chapter) and deep links to cases on BAILII. Flashcard glossary of legal terms used in the book. Annually updated test bank of 200 questions and answers for lecturers' use in assessing students. Downloadable versions of figures and tables from the book.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书给我带来的最大感受是,它并非一本“闭门造车”的学术论文,而是真正扎根于现实生活和司法实践的作品。作者在分析“侵权法”中的“侵入”(Trespass)概念时,并没有停留在抽象的定义上,而是引用了大量涉及私人财产、公共空间以及新兴技术(如无人机侵扰)的案例。他对于“侵权法”在数字时代所面临的挑战的探讨,让我看到了法律的前瞻性。我特别喜欢作者对于“免责事由”(Defenses)部分的梳理,他清晰地阐述了“同意”(Consent)、“自卫”(Self-Defense)、“不可抗力”(Act of God)等抗辩理由,并结合实际判例进行剖析,让我能够更好地理解被告如何有效抗辩。阅读过程中,我常常被作者的分析所折服,他能够准确地抓住案件的关键点,并将其与相关的法律原则巧妙地联系起来。这本书让我深刻体会到,法律并非僵化的规则,而是在不断演变和发展的鲜活生命体。
评分我一直认为,法律书籍的价值在于其能够激发读者的思考,而这本《侵权法》无疑做到了这一点。作者在讨论“侵权责任”(Torts)的类型时,没有满足于简单的分类,而是深入探讨了不同侵权行为背后的社会功能和政策考量。例如,在“诽谤”(Defamation)一章中,他不仅介绍了“实质损害”(Actual Malice)这样的法律要件,更引发了我对于言论自由与个人名誉保护之间微妙平衡的思考。他提出的观点并非一成不变,而是展现了法律在不同情境下的灵活性和适应性。我最欣赏的是作者在处理“严格责任”(Strict Liability)部分时,那种对立法者意图和司法实践演变的深刻洞察。读到后面,我发现自己不仅仅在记忆法条,更在理解法律体系的内在逻辑,以及它如何不断地适应社会变迁。这本书的行文风格相当具有启发性,它鼓励读者质疑,鼓励读者独立判断,而不是被动接受既定的答案。它促使我去思考“为什么是这样”,而不是仅仅“是什么”。
评分说实话,我一开始抱着试试看的心态购买了这本《侵权法》,没想到它带来的惊喜远超我的预期。这本书的排版设计非常人性化,重点内容用粗体或斜体标出,关键术语旁都配有清晰的定义。这对于我这种需要反复查阅和理解术语的学生来说,简直是福音。作者在讲解“精神损害赔偿”(Damages for Mental Distress)时,非常细致地分析了不同司法管辖区对于这一难题的处理方式,并对比了不同判决的优劣。这种比较性的分析让我能够更全面地理解法律的多样性和复杂性。此外,书中的图表和案例摘要也是一大亮点,它们将抽象的概念具象化,让我在短时间内就能抓住核心要义。我经常会在学习一段落后,回顾那些图表和案例,感觉知识点一下子就“活”起来了。这本书不仅是一本学习资料,更像是一位尽职尽责的“学习助手”,它始终在我需要的地方提供支持和引导,让我的学习过程高效而愉快。
评分这本书简直是我律师生涯中的“灯塔”!作为一名刚起步的诉讼律师,民事侵权法(Tort Law)领域对我来说一度是迷宫。但自从翻开这本书,一切都变得豁然开朗。作者的叙述方式非常引人入胜,他没有直接堆砌枯燥的法律条文,而是通过生动的案例分析,将复杂的概念拆解得清晰易懂。我尤其喜欢他处理“疏忽”(Negligence)那一章的方式,从“注意义务”(Duty of Care)的建立,到“违反义务”(Breach of Duty)的判断,再到“因果关系”(Causation)的认定,每一个环节都辅以大量的判例,让我能切实感受到法律如何在现实生活中运作。读这本书的感觉就像在听一位经验丰富的导师在娓娓道来,他总能在我感到困惑的地方恰到好处地给出提示,并且对每一个核心概念都进行了深入的挖掘。我发现自己不仅掌握了理论知识,更能理解这些理论背后的逻辑和价值判断。这本书真正帮助我建立起扎实的侵权法基础,让我对接下来的学习和实践充满了信心。它不像一些教科书那样枯燥乏味,而是充满了智慧和洞察力,读起来既有学习的收获,又是一种享受。
评分我必须说,这本《侵权法》的深度和广度让我惊叹不已。作者在探讨“产品责任”(Products Liability)时,不仅涵盖了传统的“制造缺陷”(Manufacturing Defect)、“设计缺陷”(Design Defect)和“警告缺陷”(Marketing Defect),还将一些更具争议性的议题,例如“不可避免的风险”(Unavoidable Danger)和“事后责任”(Post-Sale Duty to Warn)都做了深入的讨论。他对于不同法律理论(如侵权法、合同法和消费者保护法)在产品责任领域的交叉影响分析,让我对法律体系的整体性有了更深刻的认识。我尤其欣赏作者在书中引用的那些“经典案例”,它们不仅仅是历史的记录,更是理解侵权法发展脉络的关键。每一次阅读,我都会发现新的角度和更深的理解。这本书的文字功底非常扎实,每一句话都经过推敲,既严谨又不失可读性。它让我对侵权法的复杂性和精妙之处有了全新的认识,并且激发了我深入研究的兴趣。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有