"To discover who rules, follow the gold." This is the argument of Golden Rule, a provocative, pungent history of modern American politics. Although the role big money plays in defining political outcomes has long been obvious to ordinary Americans, most pundits and scholars have virtually dismissed this assumption. Even in light of skyrocketing campaign costs, the belief that major financial interests primarily determine who parties nominate and where they stand on the issues—that, in effect, Democrats and Republicans are merely the left and right wings of the "Property Party"—has been ignored by most political scientists. Offering evidence ranging from the nineteenth century to the 1994 mid-term elections, Golden Rule shows that voters are "right on the money."
Thomas Ferguson breaks completely with traditional voter centered accounts of party politics. In its place he outlines an "investment approach," in which powerful investors, not unorganized voters, dominate campaigns and elections. Because businesses "invest" in political parties and their candidates, changes in industrial structures—between large firms and sectors—can alter the agenda of party politics and the shape of public policy.
Golden Rule presents revised versions of widely read essays in which Ferguson advanced and tested his theory, including his seminal study of the role played by capital intensive multinationals and international financiers in the New Deal. The chapter "Studies in Money Driven Politics" brings this aspect of American politics into better focus, along with other studies of Federal Reserve policy making and campaign finance in the 1936 election. Ferguson analyzes how a changing world economy and other social developments broke up the New Deal system in our own time, through careful studies of the 1988 and 1992 elections. The essay on 1992 contains an extended analysis of the emergence of the Clinton coalition and Ross Perot's dramatic independent insurgency. A postscript on the 1994 elections demonstrates the controlling impact of money on several key campaigns.
This controversial work by a theorist of money and politics in the U.S. relates to issues in campaign finance reform, PACs, policymaking, public financing, and how today's elections work.
Thomas Ferguson (born 1949) is an American political scientist and author who studies and writes on politics and economics, often within a historical perspective. He is a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston and a member of the advisory board for George Soros' Institute for New Economic Thinking. He obtained his Ph.D. from Princeton University. A contributing editor for The Nation and a contributing writer to The Huffington Post, he is a frequent guest and economic commentator on numerous radio and television programs. He is known for his investment theory of party competition.
I agree on the point that money rules American's politics.Not only it grasps the information distribution channel by owning them(FOX/Wall StreetJournal supports the Republicans while NBC/New York Times supports Democrats),but also it deliberatelyfocuses mor...
评分I agree on the point that money rules American's politics.Not only it grasps the information distribution channel by owning them(FOX/Wall StreetJournal supports the Republicans while NBC/New York Times supports Democrats),but also it deliberatelyfocuses mor...
评分I agree on the point that money rules American's politics.Not only it grasps the information distribution channel by owning them(FOX/Wall StreetJournal supports the Republicans while NBC/New York Times supports Democrats),but also it deliberatelyfocuses mor...
评分I agree on the point that money rules American's politics.Not only it grasps the information distribution channel by owning them(FOX/Wall StreetJournal supports the Republicans while NBC/New York Times supports Democrats),but also it deliberatelyfocuses mor...
评分I agree on the point that money rules American's politics.Not only it grasps the information distribution channel by owning them(FOX/Wall StreetJournal supports the Republicans while NBC/New York Times supports Democrats),but also it deliberatelyfocuses mor...
如果用一个词来形容《烹饪与记忆的协奏曲》,那就是“治愈”。这本书与其说是一本食谱,不如说是一本关于如何通过食物来重建生活的散文集。作者是一位年迈的法国大厨,他没有用复杂的米其林术语来炫耀技艺,而是将每道菜肴与他生命中的重要时刻联系起来。读到他描述如何为亡妻重现一道失传的普罗旺斯炖菜时,那种对逝去时光的怀念和对食材的敬畏,让人热泪盈眶。这本书的阅读体验非常温暖,它成功地将味觉、嗅觉和情感记忆无缝对接。比如,他对如何完美揉捏面团的描述,不是机械的步骤讲解,而是融入了他童年在祖母厨房里的嬉闹场景。排版和插图的选用也极具匠心,那些手绘的草图和泛黄的照片,配合着作者略带颤抖的笔迹,营造出一种亲密无间的交谈感。我按照书中的一道“夏日番茄冷汤”的配方尝试制作,虽然味道或许远不及书中所描绘的意境,但整个制作过程本身,已经成为我生活中一次美好的小仪式。这是一本让你想立刻走进厨房,又想泡一杯茶慢慢品读的书。
评分《迷雾之城的低语》这部小说,简直是纯粹的感官盛宴。我通常对奇幻文学不太感冒,总觉得设定太过繁复,但这本书完全颠覆了我的偏见。作者构建的“永恒之夜”城市——阿卡迪亚,简直是文学想象力的巅峰之作。那里没有太阳,一切光源都依赖于一种会唱歌的苔藓,这种设定本身就充满了诗意和诡谲。叙事节奏把握得极其精妙,前三分之一是缓慢、压抑的铺垫,营造出一种挥之不去的宿命感,让你感到每一个角落都潜藏着危险;进入中段后,剧情如同被点燃的火药桶,接连不断的追逐、阴谋和揭秘,让人根本无法合眼。主角团的化学反应非常自然,特别是那个沉默寡言的机械师和那个言辞犀利的吟游诗人之间的互动,充满了亦敌亦友的张力。我尤其喜欢书中对于“声音”的描写,作者似乎能将无形的声波具象化,比如“恐惧的低语像碎玻璃一样划过空气”。读完后,那种身处那座幽暗城市中尚未散去的寒意,久久萦绕心头,非常过瘾。
评分坦白讲,当我翻开《代码之外的秘密》时,我原本预期这是一本枯燥的技术手册,毕竟书名听起来就充满了晦涩的计算机术语。然而,我大错特错了。这本书的核心,竟然是一群顶尖程序员在硅谷光鲜亮丽背后的真实人生哲学和道德困境。作者的采访功力令人叹服,他不仅深入挖掘了那些改变世界的算法是如何诞生的,更重要的是,探讨了创造这些强大工具的人类本身所面临的伦理边界。书中有一章详细描述了“零日漏洞”的发现者如何在商业利益与公共安全之间做出痛苦抉择,那种紧张感简直能透过纸面传递出来。语言风格上,这本书摒弃了学术腔调,大量运用了对话和案例分析,读起来节奏明快,充满了智慧的火花。它成功地将原本高冷的科技前沿拉到了普通人可以理解的层面,让我这个非技术背景的读者也能体会到代码世界里的波谲云诡。更让我深思的是,书中多次提及的“数字原罪”概念,引发了我对未来人工智能伦理的深刻思考。这本书不只是写给程序员看的,它更像是写给所有关心现代社会运行机制的人的一剂清醒剂。
评分我必须承认,《行星漂流者》在科幻文学的领域里,提供了一个非常清奇的视角。它没有宏大的星际战争,也没有拯救人类的英雄主义,聚焦的只是“遗忘”这件事本身。故事设定在一个高度依赖生物记忆存储的未来社会,当记忆开始腐化和失真时,整个文明的基础也随之动摇。作者对这种“认知熵增”的探讨,简直是天才级别的想象。叙事上,这本书采取了第一人称的日记体形式,主人公“编号734”的视角非常局限和主观,这反而加深了阅读的悬疑感——我们读到的到底是不是真相?那些关于他们所居住的巨型空间站“方舟”的历史记载,真假难辨。语言风格极其冷峻、疏离,充满了对存在意义的哲学拷问,读起来需要高度集中注意力,因为它很少提供明确的指引,更像是引导读者自己去拼凑碎片。最让我印象深刻的是,书中对于“数据永生”的批判,它不是简单地否定技术,而是探讨了当记忆可以被编辑和重写时,“自我”的价值究竟何在。这是一部需要静下心来,带着思考才能真正领略其深意的硬核科幻作品。
评分这本新近读完的书,名叫《时间的回响》,真是一次令人沉醉的阅读体验。作者以极其细腻的笔触,描绘了一个跨越世纪的家族故事,其间的人物塑造丰满得令人难以忘怀。我仿佛能嗅到维多利亚时代伦敦街头的煤烟味,也能感受到二战期间柏林地下室的压抑与恐惧。故事的主线围绕着一个神秘的家族徽章展开,这个徽章不仅是家族荣耀的象征,更是承载着一系列难以言说的秘密和诅咒。叙事结构上,作者巧妙地采用了非线性叙事,在不同时间线之间自由穿梭,却又丝毫不显混乱,反而像是一张精心编织的挂毯,每一条线索都与其他线索紧密相连,最终汇集成一个令人震撼的整体。特别是对主人公艾米莉亚在面对家族历史重担时的内心挣扎,描绘得入木三分,那种既想挣脱又无法割舍的矛盾情感,让我几度为之动容落泪。书中的历史细节考据扎实,读起来让人感觉仿佛是在参与一场跨越时空的对话,而非仅仅是阅读文字。唯一美中不足的,也许是对于某个次要角色的命运处理得稍显仓促,不过瑕不掩瑜,总体而言,这是一部值得反复品味的史诗巨著。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有