The Politics of Modern Japan

The Politics of Modern Japan pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 在線閱讀 2026

☆☆☆☆☆
出版者:Routledge
作者:Hood, Christopher 編
出品人:
頁數:1792
译者:
出版時間:2008-6-26
價格:GBP 1141.82
裝幀:Hardcover
isbn號碼:9780415439558
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 比較政治
  • 日本政治
  • 日本
  • 政治學
  • 參考書
  • 日本政治
  • 現代日本
  • 政治學
  • 日本曆史
  • 亞洲政治
  • 政治製度
  • 公共政策
  • 社會科學
  • 日本研究
  • 政治文化
想要找書就要到 本本書屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

具體描述

Owing to the changing nature of Japan and its role within the world, more needs to be known of the dynamics of Japanese politics. This timely set brings together key articles on the most crucial issues facing Japanese politics today, and the relationship between Japanese politics and the main institutions including big business, the bureaucracy and the media. This is an area that has been studied by leading academics for a number of decades, but whose work has yet to be given sufficient notice or credit. With more and more students enrolling at universities to study Japan, there is a demand for books which bring comprehensive and key articles under one umbrella. To date there have been few books which have dealt with Japanese politics. Most have been on issues which are covered in articles contained in this collection.

現代日本政治的復雜圖景:一部深度解析 書名:《現代日本政治的復雜圖景》(暫定) 作者:[此處留空,以增強真實感] 內容簡介: 本書旨在為讀者提供一幅關於戰後乃至當代日本政治格局的全麵、深入的圖景。它並非對某一特定曆史時期的簡單迴顧,而是對支撐日本現代政治體係運行的深層結構、意識形態衝突、關鍵製度演變以及社會動員模式進行細緻入微的解剖。全書聚焦於理解日本政治的“韌性”與“變遷”,探討其在持續的全球化壓力、人口結構劇變以及地緣政治博弈中,如何維持其獨特的民主形式與治理模式。 第一部分:戰後秩序的基石與結構性約束 本書的開篇著重於確立理解現代日本政治的必要曆史背景和製度框架。我們首先考察“昭和遺緒”——即戰敗後的政治重塑——如何塑造瞭今日的政治生態。這包括對1947年《日本國憲法》中和平主義條款(尤其是第九條)的持續爭議及其對自衛隊閤法性、防務政策製定的深刻影響。 體製的“一黨優勢”與派閥政治: 我們將深入分析自1955年以來,自由民主黨(LDP)如何建立並長期維持其對國會的絕對控製。這不僅僅是簡單的多數黨現象,而是建立在一係列復雜的政治生態之上的:包括自民黨內部強大的派閥(Habatsu)運作機製、官僚體係(特彆是大藏省和後來的財務省)的強大“有權”地位,以及與經濟界(Keiretsu)和媒體之間形成的微妙的“鐵三角”關係。本書將通過對曆次黨內總裁選舉的案例分析,揭示派閥政治如何成為資源分配和權力平衡的核心手段,而非僅僅是意識形態的反映。 選舉製度的變遷與影響: 簡要迴顧戰後選舉製度的幾次重大改革(特彆是1993年的改革),分析這些改革如何試圖打破傳統的小選區製下對自民黨有利的局麵。然而,我們將論證,盡管製度有所調整,但根深蒂固的地方利益網絡(如“田中角榮模式”的繼承者們)和對社會穩定的追求,使得政治競爭的烈度在某些方麵並未發生根本性的改變。 第二部分:意識形態的戰場與身份認同的重塑 現代日本政治的核心張力,往往體現在對於“日本性”(Nihonjinron)的定義以及如何麵對曆史創傷的爭論上。 曆史修正主義與“道歉文化”的拉鋸戰: 本部分專門探討圍繞慰安婦問題、南京大屠殺曆史敘事以及參拜靖國神社等議題的政治博弈。我們分析瞭保守派如何試圖通過重寫教科書和文化輸齣來重塑國傢身份的努力,以及這在東亞地緣政治中所引發的強烈反應。這種對曆史的持續爭論,是理解當代日本外交政策和國內民族主義情緒的重要切入點。 “保守主義”的內在分歧: 日本的保守主義並非鐵闆一塊。本書區分瞭以“經濟自由主義”為導嚮的“鷹派”(如小泉純一郎時期的改革嘗試),以及以“傳統價值維護”和“修憲”為核心的“國傢主義”派彆。分析這些不同派係在對待社會問題(如女性就業、同性婚姻、移民政策)上的立場差異,有助於理解自民黨內部的意識形態光譜。 社會運動與公民社會的力量: 盡管日本的公民社會常被批評為組織鬆散,但本書仍關注近年來興起的特定議題運動,例如反對安保法案的“Seiji Chieko”(政治素人)運動,以及針對核能政策和地方經濟衰退的抗議活動。這些運動如何試圖穿透傳統的政治精英結構,是衡量日本民主活力的關鍵指標。 第三部分:治理的挑戰:經濟停滯與人口危機 現代日本政治麵臨的最嚴峻挑戰,是如何管理一個長期陷入低增長泥潭、並快速走嚮超高齡化的社會。 “失落的三十年”的政治責任: 本章詳細審視瞭泡沫經濟破裂後,曆屆政府在財政刺激、結構性改革和貨幣政策上的反復嘗試。我們分析瞭“安倍經濟學”的“三支箭”戰略,評估瞭其在刺激通脹和提高勞動參與率方麵的成效與局限性,並探討瞭對公共債務和代際公平的長期影響。政治決策者在應對結構性通縮時的猶豫不決,是理解日本經濟政策“慣性”的關鍵。 人口結構逆轉對政治的影響: 人口老齡化不再僅僅是社會問題,它已成為核心政治議題。本書探討瞭養老金和醫療保健係統的財政壓力,以及政治傢如何在不引發選民強烈反彈的情況下推行改革。此外,我們還分析瞭農村地區的“消亡”對選舉地理的影響,以及這如何進一步鞏固瞭對傳統農業利益的政治保護。 移民政策的矛盾性: 麵對勞動力短缺,日本政府在逐步放寬技術移民政策,但其文化上的不情願和法律上的模糊性,使得日本的移民融入問題成為一個高風險的政治敏感點。本書分析瞭政治精英如何在“需要勞動力”和“維護文化同質性”之間進行痛苦的平衡。 第四部分:日本的對外政策與安全戰略 現代日本政治的運行,始終與它在大國博弈中的定位息息相關。 日美同盟的演變與“正常化”訴求: 本部分集中討論日美安保條約在冷戰後的持續重要性,以及對衝繩基地問題的處理如何成為日本國內政治的持續痛點。同時,我們追蹤瞭自安倍晉三以來,日本在行使集體自衛權、深化安全閤作方麵的努力,分析瞭修憲派如何利用地區安全環境的變化來推進其“正常國傢”的目標。 對華和對朝政策的戰略睏境: 審視日本如何在經濟上依賴中國,同時在安全上與美國結盟的復雜地緣政治處境。本書分析瞭福島核事故後對核能政策的重新評估,以及這如何影響其對地區核擴散的立場。麵對朝鮮的導彈威脅,日本的預警係統、導彈防禦體係(如“薩德”係統)的部署,均在國內引發瞭關於軍事化程度的激烈辯論。 結論:民主的適應性與未來的不確定性 全書的結論將總結現代日本政治的突齣特徵——其對現狀的強大維護能力(Status Quo Bias),以及在製度框架內進行漸進式調整的特點。我們強調,日本的政治體係雖然在應對速度上顯得遲緩,但其基礎的穩定性和法律的延續性確保瞭社會沒有齣現極端的政治撕裂。然而,本書也對新興的挑戰——從數字威權主義的外部滲透到國內青年政治參與度的下降——提齣瞭警示,指齣這些因素可能在未來幾十年內,迫使這個被譽為“穩定樣闆”的民主國傢進行更劇烈的結構性轉變。

作者簡介

Dr Christopher P. Hood is the Director of the Cardiff Japanese Studies Centre (Cardiff University) and an Associate Fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (‘Chatham House’). His publications include Japanese Education Reform: Nakasone’s Legacy (Routledge, 2001), Doing Business with the Japanese (co-editor, Direct Image 2003) and Shinkansen - From Bullet Train to Symbol of Modern Japan (Routledge, 2006).

目錄資訊

Volume I: Politics and Society
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: The Importance of Japanese Politics’.
1. Bradley Richardson and Dennis Patterson, ‘Political Traditions and Political Change: The Significance of Postwar Japanese Politics for Political Science, Annual Review of Political Science, 2001, 4, pp. 94–111.
2. Inoguchi Takashi ‘Social Capital in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 73–112.
3. Patrick Köllner, ‘Factionalism in Japanese Political Parties Revisited or How do Factions in the LDP and DPJ Differ?’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 87–109.
4. Sean Richey and Ikeda Ken’ichi, ‘The Influence of Political Discussion on Policy Preference: A Comparison of the United States and Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.3, pp. 272–88.
5. Ethan Scheiner, ‘Pipelines of Pork: Japanese Politics and a Model of Local Opposition Party Failure’, Comparative Political Studies, 2005, 38, pp. 799–823.
6. Aurelia George Mulgan, ‘Japan’s Interventionist State: Bringing Agriculture Back In’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.1, pp. 29–61.
7. Christopher P. Hood, ‘From Polling Station to Political Station? Politics and the Shinkansen’, Japan Forum, 2006, 18.1, pp. 45–63.
8. Ian Holliday and Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Governing from the Centre: Core Executive Capacity in Britain and Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.1, pp. 91–111.
9. Ito Shin’ichiro, ‘Shaping Policy Diffusion: Event History Analyses of Regional Laws in Japanese Prefectures’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2001, 2.2, pp. 211–35.
10. Michael Laver and Kenneth Benoit, ‘Estimating Party Policy Positions: Japan in Comparative Context’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 187–209.
11. Gary W. Cox, M. Masuyama, and M. D. McCubbins, ‘Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 1–21.
12. Robert Huckfeldt, Ikeda Ken’ichi, and Franz Urban Pappi, ‘Political Expertise, Interdependent Citizens, and the Value Added Problem in Democratic Politics’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 171–95.
13. J. A. A. Stockwin, ‘To Oppose or Appease? Parties Out of Power and the Need for Real Politics in Japan’, Japan Forum, 2006, 18.1, pp. 115–32.
14. Andrew Dewit and Sven Steinmo, ‘The Political Economy of Taxes and Redistribution in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2002, 5.2, pp. 159–78.
15. James Babb, ‘Two Currents of Conservatism in Modern Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2002, 5.2, pp. 215–32.
16. Rikki Kersten, ‘Revisionism, Reaction and the "Symbol Emperor" in Post-war Japan’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.1, pp. 15–31.
17. Robert Aspinall and Peter Cave, ‘Lowering the Flag: Democracy, Authority, and Rights at Tokorozawa High School’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2001, 4.1, pp. 77–93.
18. Curtis H. Martin, ‘The Sinking of the Ehime Maru: The Interaction of Culture, Security Interests and Domestic Politics in an Alliance Crisis’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.2, pp. 287–310.
Volume II: The Prime Minister and Change
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Responding to Change and Making Changes’.
19. Patrick Koellner, ‘The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Changes in the Koizumi Era’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.2, pp. 243–57.
20. Takayasu Kensuke, ‘Prime-Ministerial Power in Japan: A Re-examination’, Japan Forum, 2005, 17.2, pp. 163–84.
21. Richard J. Samuels, ‘Leadership and Political Change in Japan: The Case of the Second Rincho’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2003, 29.1, pp. 1–31.
22. Ellis S. Krauss and Benjamin Nyblade, ‘Presidentialization in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan’, British Journal of Political Science, 2005, 35, pp. 357–68.
23. Kabashima Ikuo and Gill Steel, ‘How Junichiro Koizumi Seized the Leadership of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2007, 8.1, pp. 95–114.
24. Park Cheol Hee, ‘Political Dynamics of Regime Transformation in Japan in the 1990s’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.2, pp. 311–22.
25. Stephen R. Reed, ‘Political Reform in Japan: Combining Scientific and Historical Analysis’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 177–93.
26. S. Javed Maswood and SadahiroYukio, ‘A Tale of Two Japans: Reform in a Divided Polity’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.1, pp. 33–53.
27. John Creighton Campbell, ‘Administrative Reform as Policy Change and Policy Non-Change’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 157–76.
28. Takaaki Suzuki, ‘Administrative Reform and the Politics of Budgetary Retrenchment in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 195–213.
29. Kawabata Eiji, ‘Dual Governance: The Contemporary Politics of Posts and Telecommunications in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 21–39.
30. Patricia L. MacLachlan, ‘Storming the Castle: The Battle for Postal Reform in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.1, pp. 1–18.
31. Frank Schwartz, ‘Civil Society in Japan Reconsidered’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.2, pp. 195–215.
32. Patricia L. MacLachlan, ‘Japanese Civil Society in the Age of Deregulation: The Case of Consumers’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.2, pp. 217–42.
33. Seung-Mi Han, ‘From the Communitarian Ideal to the Public Sphere: The Making of Foreigners’ Assemblies in Kawasaki City and Kanagawa Prefecture’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 41–60.
34. Masaki Taniguchi, ‘Changing Media, Changing Politics in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2007, 8.1, pp. 147–66.
35. Iida Yumiko, ‘Media Politics and Reified Nation: Japanese Culture and Politics Under Information Capitalism’, Japanese Studies, 2003, 23.1, pp. 23–42.
36. Nanri Keizo, ‘The Conundrum of Japanese Editorials: Polarized, Diversified and Homogeneous’, Japanese Studies, 2005, 25.2, pp. 169–85.
37. David M. Potter and Douglas van Belle, ‘News Media Coverage Influence on Japan’s Foreign Aid Allocations’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 113–35.
Volume III: Japanese Politics on the International Stage
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Pragmatic and Cooperative, but Sometimes Alone’
38. Bert Edström, ‘The Yoshida Doctrine and the Unipolar World’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 63–85.
39. Ishizuka Katsumi, ‘Japan and UN Peace Operations’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 137–57.
40. Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Japan’s Top-Down Policy Process to Dispatch the SDF to Iraq’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.1, pp. 71–91.
41. Linus Hagström, ‘Ubiquity of "Power" and the Advantage of Terminological Pluralism: Japan’s Foreign Policy Discourse’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 145–64.
42. Davis B. Bobrow and Mark A. Boyer, ‘Public Opinion and International Policy Choices: Global Commitments for Japan and Its Peers?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2001, 2.1, pp. 67–95.
43. Rikki Kersten, ‘Neo-nationalism and the "Liberal School of History"’, Japan Forum, 1999, 11.2, pp. 191–203.
44. Caroline Rose, ‘"Patriotism is Not Taboo": Nationalism in China and Japan and Implications for Sino-Japanese Relations’, Japan Forum, 2000, 12.2, pp. 169–81.
45. Caroline Rose, ‘The Textbook Issue: Domestic Sources of Japan’s Foreign Policy’, Japan Forum, 1999, 11.2, pp. 205–16.
46. Sakaedani Akiko ‘2002 FIFA World Cup and its Effects on the Reconciliation Between Japan and the Republic of Korea’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 233–57.
47. Julie Gilson and Phillida Purvis, ‘Japan’s Pursuit of Human Security: Humanitarian Agenda or Political Pragmatism’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.2, pp. 193–207.
48. Bert Edström, ‘Japan’s Foreign Policy and Human Security’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.2, pp. 209–25.
49. Lydia N. Yu-Jose, ‘Global Environmental Issues: Responses from Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 23–50.
50. Hirata Keiko, ‘Beached Whales: Examining Japan’s Rejection of an International Norm’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.2, pp. 177–97.
51. Ian Holliday, ‘Japan and the Myanmar Stalemate: Regional Power and Resolution of a Regional Problem’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 393–410.
52. Ji You, ‘East Asian Community: A New Platform for Sino-Japanese Cooperation and Contention’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.1, pp. 19–28.
53. Terada Takashi, ‘Forming an East Asian Community: A Site for Japan-China Power Struggles’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.1, pp. 5–17.
54. Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Ozawa Ichiro as an Actor in Foreign Policy-Making’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 37–61.
Volume IV: Elections and Changes in Japanese Society
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Elections: Reflecting Japan or the Politicians?’
55. Ellis S. Krauss and Robert Pekkanen, ‘Explaining Party Adaptation to Electoral Reform: The Discreet Charm of the LDP?’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2004, 30.1, pp. 1–34.
56. Margarita Estévez-Abe, ‘Japan’s Shift Toward a Westminster System: A Structural Analysis of the 2005 Lower House Election and its Aftermath’, Asian Survey, 2006, 46.4, pp. 632–51.
57. Patrick Fournier and Kohno Masaru, ‘Japan’s Multimember SNTV System and Strategic Voting: The "M + 1 Rule" and Beyond’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 275–93.
58. Jonathan Lewis and Brian J. Masshardt, ‘Election Posters in Japan’, Japan Forum, 2002, 14.3, pp. 373–404.
59. Hizen Yoichi, ‘The Effect of Dual Candidacy on Voting Decisions’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.3, pp. 289–306.
60. Karen E. Cox and Leonard J. Schoppa, ‘Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy’, Comparative Political Studies, 2002, 35, pp. 1027–53.
61. Patrick Köllner, ‘Upper House Elections in Japan and the Power of the "Organized Vote"’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.1, pp. 113–37.
62. George Ehrhardt, ‘Factional Influence on the 2001 LDP Primaries: A Quantitative Analysis’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.1, pp. 59–69.
63. Kawato Sadafumi, ‘Strategic Contexts of the Vote on Political Reform Bills’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 23–51.
64. Steven R. Reed and Ethan Scheiner, ‘Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in Japan’, British Journal of Political Science, 2003, 33.3, pp. 469–90.
65. Kabashima Ikuo and Steven R. Reed, ‘Voter Reactions to "Strange Bedfellows": The Japanese Voter Faces a Kaleidoscope of Changing Coalitions’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 229–48.
66. Chieko Numata, ‘Checking the Center: Popular Referenda in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.1, pp. 19–31.
67. Sherry L. Martin, ‘Alienated, Independent and Female: Lessons from the Japanese Electorate’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 1–19.
68. Catherine Bochel and Hugh Bochel, ‘Exploring the Low Levels of Women’s Representation in Japanese Local Government’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 375–92.
69. Maeda Yukio, ‘External Constraints on Female Political Participation’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 345–73.
70. Takeda Hiroko, ‘Gendering the Japanese Political System: The Gender-Specific Pattern of Political Activity and Women’s Political Participation’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.2, pp. 185–98.
71. Tsunematsu Naomi, ‘Gender Power Under Female Leadership: A Local Women’s Association in Japan’, Japanese Studies, 2004, 24.1, pp. 97–114.
· · · · · · (收起)

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等

© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有