This book is concerned with the complexity and difficulty of reading the Oresteia. It is not a traditional commentary, although it is often concerned with problems of interpretation and language, nor is it simply what is generally understood by a literary study, although it often discusses the wider themes of the narrative. It is a close reading of the text concentrating on the developing meanings of words within the structuring of the play. In particular, Simon Goldhill focuses on the text's interests in language and its control, in sexuality and sexual difference, and in the progression and description of events. Dr Goldhill links a sound philological knowledge with material drawn widely from modern literary theory and anthropological studies. The result is a challenging and provocative book, which offers for the serious student of Greek drama an exciting range of insights into one of the most important texts of the ancient world.
發表於2025-01-15
Language, Sexuality, Narrative 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
搬一條4月份的筆記 #金小山 重新讀瞭Goldhill對Oresteia的研究的序言,感覺他用羅蘭巴特和德裏達的話解答瞭我的一個一直描述不好的問題:為什麼悲劇的儀式隱喻似乎總是無限復雜,比任何一種commentary的注疏都更復雜,似乎詩行本身在抵抗著解讀? 一種解釋是,這是齣於悲劇語...
評分搬一條4月份的筆記 #金小山 重新讀瞭Goldhill對Oresteia的研究的序言,感覺他用羅蘭巴特和德裏達的話解答瞭我的一個一直描述不好的問題:為什麼悲劇的儀式隱喻似乎總是無限復雜,比任何一種commentary的注疏都更復雜,似乎詩行本身在抵抗著解讀? 一種解釋是,這是齣於悲劇語...
評分搬一條4月份的筆記 #金小山 重新讀瞭Goldhill對Oresteia的研究的序言,感覺他用羅蘭巴特和德裏達的話解答瞭我的一個一直描述不好的問題:為什麼悲劇的儀式隱喻似乎總是無限復雜,比任何一種commentary的注疏都更復雜,似乎詩行本身在抵抗著解讀? 一種解釋是,這是齣於悲劇語...
評分搬一條4月份的筆記 #金小山 重新讀瞭Goldhill對Oresteia的研究的序言,感覺他用羅蘭巴特和德裏達的話解答瞭我的一個一直描述不好的問題:為什麼悲劇的儀式隱喻似乎總是無限復雜,比任何一種commentary的注疏都更復雜,似乎詩行本身在抵抗著解讀? 一種解釋是,這是齣於悲劇語...
評分搬一條4月份的筆記 #金小山 重新讀瞭Goldhill對Oresteia的研究的序言,感覺他用羅蘭巴特和德裏達的話解答瞭我的一個一直描述不好的問題:為什麼悲劇的儀式隱喻似乎總是無限復雜,比任何一種commentary的注疏都更復雜,似乎詩行本身在抵抗著解讀? 一種解釋是,這是齣於悲劇語...
圖書標籤:
Language, Sexuality, Narrative 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載