This groundbreaking study brings into dialogue for the first time the writings of Julian, the last non-Christian Roman Emperor, and his most outspoken critic, Bishop Gregory of Nazianzus, a central figure of Christianity. Susanna Elm compares these two men not to draw out the obvious contrast between the Church and the Emperor’s neo-Paganism, but rather to find their common intellectual and social grounding. Her insightful analysis, supplemented by her magisterial command of sources, demonstrates the ways in which both men were part of the same dialectical whole. Elm recasts both Julian and Gregory as men entirely of their times, showing how the Roman Empire in fact provided Christianity with the ideological and social matrix without which its longevity and dynamism would have been inconceivable.
拖了好久,终于看完了。作者把Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Eunomius等人的神学都放在Neo-Platonism的背景下,然后指出,比如,Eunomius还受了Aristotle什么影响,怎么使用homonym和polysemy的区别,才会有本质不相似的说法。Gregory也是受了Stoic oikeiosis影响,什么的...
评分拖了好久,终于看完了。作者把Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Eunomius等人的神学都放在Neo-Platonism的背景下,然后指出,比如,Eunomius还受了Aristotle什么影响,怎么使用homonym和polysemy的区别,才会有本质不相似的说法。Gregory也是受了Stoic oikeiosis影响,什么的...
评分拖了好久,终于看完了。作者把Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Eunomius等人的神学都放在Neo-Platonism的背景下,然后指出,比如,Eunomius还受了Aristotle什么影响,怎么使用homonym和polysemy的区别,才会有本质不相似的说法。Gregory也是受了Stoic oikeiosis影响,什么的...
评分拖了好久,终于看完了。作者把Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Eunomius等人的神学都放在Neo-Platonism的背景下,然后指出,比如,Eunomius还受了Aristotle什么影响,怎么使用homonym和polysemy的区别,才会有本质不相似的说法。Gregory也是受了Stoic oikeiosis影响,什么的...
评分拖了好久,终于看完了。作者把Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Eunomius等人的神学都放在Neo-Platonism的背景下,然后指出,比如,Eunomius还受了Aristotle什么影响,怎么使用homonym和polysemy的区别,才会有本质不相似的说法。Gregory也是受了Stoic oikeiosis影响,什么的...
这书太好玩了,但也太难读了……参考熊友邻的两篇评论XDDDD
评分这书太好玩了,但也太难读了……参考熊友邻的两篇评论XDDDD
评分这书太好玩了,但也太难读了……参考熊友邻的两篇评论XDDDD
评分这书太好玩了,但也太难读了……参考熊友邻的两篇评论XDDDD
评分这书太好玩了,但也太难读了……参考熊友邻的两篇评论XDDDD
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有