Linda Greenhouse began covering the Supreme Court for The New York Times in 1978. With the exception of two years during the mid-1980's, during which she covered Congress, she served as the paper's regular Supreme Court correspondent until 2008. Previously, she covered local and state government and politics for the Times in New York, and was chief of the newspaper's legislative bureau in Albany. She has appeared as a Washington Week panelist since 1980.
She is a graduate of Radcliffe College, where she currently serves on the advisory committee to the Schlesinger Library on the History of American Women. She earned a Master of Studies in Law degree from Yale Law School, and has several honorary degrees.
For her coverage of the Court, she was awarded a Pulitzer Prize in Journalism (beat reporting) in 1998. In 2004, she received the Goldsmith Career Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and the John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
For 30 years, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Linda Greenhouse chronicled the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court and its justices as a correspondent for the New York Times. In this Very Short Introduction, she draws on her deep knowledge of the court's history and of its written and unwritten rules to show readers how the Supreme Court really works. Greenhouse offers a fascinating institutional biography of a place and its people - men and women - who exercise great power but whose names and faces are unrecognized by many Americans and whose work often appears cloaked in mystery. How do cases get to the Supreme Court? How do the justices go about deciding them? What special role does the chief justice play? What do the law clerks do? How does the court relate to the other branches of government? Greenhouse answers these questions by depicting the justices as they confront deep constitutional issues or wrestle with the meaning of confusing federal statutes. Throughout, the author examines many individual Supreme Court cases to illustrate points under discussion, ranging from Marbury v. Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which struck down the District of Columbia's gun-control statute and which was, surprisingly, the first time in its history that the Court issued an authoritative interpretation of the Second Amendment. To add perspective, Greenhouse also compares the Court to foreign courts, revealing interesting differences. For instance, no other country in the world has chosen to bestow life tenure on its judges. A superb overview packed with telling details, this volume offers a matchless introduction to one of the pillars of American government.
在美国,政府的行政分支和立法分支属于政治分支,因为他们由人民选举产生,目的是为公共事务作决策。而制宪者设置司法分支,不是为了让它成为反映多数人意志的工具,因此,不能把法院看做政治机构。正是基于上述原因,最高法院向来认为,政治问题应该交给政治分支解决,法院不...
评分【美】罗伯特•麦克洛斯基著、桑福德•列文森修订:《美国最高法院》(第三版),任东来等译,中国政法大学出版社2005 年版。 【美】伯纳德•施瓦茨:《美国最高法院史》,毕洪海等译,中国政法大学出版社2005 年版。 【美】克米特•霍尔主编:《牛津美国联邦最高法...
评分申欣旺/文 一群中国人,热切地读一本关于美国最高法院的书,这种现象多少有点令人感觉复杂。最近《美国最高法院通识读本》中译本面世,很快便在销售排行榜上占据重要位置。 这是一本很“简单”的书。和中国的作者习惯大部头不一样,整本书翻译成中文,不过寥寥100页...
评分阅读美国历史,除不断更迭的总统、争论不休的国会两院外,不那么引人注目但在特定节点总能起着关键作用的,恐怕就是美国最高法院。不过,相比总统大选、国会立法的具体程序,美国最高法院,虽广为人知但其权限、运行机制、法官任期,对多数人来说可能仍是个谜,更何况,最高法...
评分【美】罗伯特•麦克洛斯基著、桑福德•列文森修订:《美国最高法院》(第三版),任东来等译,中国政法大学出版社2005 年版。 【美】伯纳德•施瓦茨:《美国最高法院史》,毕洪海等译,中国政法大学出版社2005 年版。 【美】克米特•霍尔主编:《牛津美国联邦最高法...
燈塔國令人感動。
评分扫盲书,清楚明白好看
评分A good framework to understand the us Supreme Court for casual readers. 最後提供的擴展閱讀書單也很有幫助。
评分很短 可以有大概了解但还不够!
评分扫盲书,清楚明白好看
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有