Linda Greenhouse began covering the Supreme Court for The New York Times in 1978. With the exception of two years during the mid-1980's, during which she covered Congress, she served as the paper's regular Supreme Court correspondent until 2008. Previously, she covered local and state government and politics for the Times in New York, and was chief of the newspaper's legislative bureau in Albany. She has appeared as a Washington Week panelist since 1980.
She is a graduate of Radcliffe College, where she currently serves on the advisory committee to the Schlesinger Library on the History of American Women. She earned a Master of Studies in Law degree from Yale Law School, and has several honorary degrees.
For her coverage of the Court, she was awarded a Pulitzer Prize in Journalism (beat reporting) in 1998. In 2004, she received the Goldsmith Career Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and the John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
For 30 years, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Linda Greenhouse chronicled the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court and its justices as a correspondent for the New York Times. In this Very Short Introduction, she draws on her deep knowledge of the court's history and of its written and unwritten rules to show readers how the Supreme Court really works. Greenhouse offers a fascinating institutional biography of a place and its people - men and women - who exercise great power but whose names and faces are unrecognized by many Americans and whose work often appears cloaked in mystery. How do cases get to the Supreme Court? How do the justices go about deciding them? What special role does the chief justice play? What do the law clerks do? How does the court relate to the other branches of government? Greenhouse answers these questions by depicting the justices as they confront deep constitutional issues or wrestle with the meaning of confusing federal statutes. Throughout, the author examines many individual Supreme Court cases to illustrate points under discussion, ranging from Marbury v. Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which struck down the District of Columbia's gun-control statute and which was, surprisingly, the first time in its history that the Court issued an authoritative interpretation of the Second Amendment. To add perspective, Greenhouse also compares the Court to foreign courts, revealing interesting differences. For instance, no other country in the world has chosen to bestow life tenure on its judges. A superb overview packed with telling details, this volume offers a matchless introduction to one of the pillars of American government.
發表於2025-03-04
The U.S. Supreme Court 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
一 “哪位朋友可以說齣照片上所有大法官的姓名,我可以送他一本新書。”2013年1月26日,我在北京單嚮街書店參加一次以“律政劇、法律翻譯和司法文化”為主題的講座。開場時,為瞭活躍氣氛,我亮齣美國最高法...
評分牛津的這套係列通識讀本非常好,不厚的一本書,講述瞭美國最高法院的前世今生,瞭解瞭美國最高法院的權利和地位,還有最高法院的大法官是那些人。美國的法律與大陸法係完全不同,平時很少有機會去瞭解這些內容,而且這書中的案例和判例都寫的十分具體,讓人明白是怎麼樣的事件...
評分記得法院組織我們到中學進行普法宣傳的時候,老師嚮好幾百號學生介紹說今天請律師來我們校進行青春路上,我們與法同行的講座。那一瞬間,我愣住瞭。我雖然知道身邊很多人對法官和律師分不清楚,但是,我萬萬沒想到的是作為授業解惑的老師居然也分不清二者區彆。那一刻,...
評分 評分譯本很短,對最高法院的解讀限於以美國《憲法》第三條規定的範圍,並無其它解讀。總而言,內容過少,齣版時可能為使小本略顯厚度,而附瞭大量英文索引入譯詞,並將原版英文附注於後,正文內容約296頁,中文譯文僅占105頁,原文其它約190頁,可見內容之少,僅約三分之一餘。
圖書標籤: 法律 美國 法學 法律與法學 曆史 美國聯邦最高法院 VSI 科普
簡明扼要、主旨清晰,讀時酣暢淋灕,讀完意猶未盡,也的確如這本書的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
評分燈塔國令人感動。
評分A good framework to understand the us Supreme Court for casual readers. 最後提供的擴展閱讀書單也很有幫助。
評分燈塔國令人感動。
評分簡明扼要、主旨清晰,讀時酣暢淋灕,讀完意猶未盡,也的確如這本書的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
The U.S. Supreme Court 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載