Linda Greenhouse began covering the Supreme Court for The New York Times in 1978. With the exception of two years during the mid-1980's, during which she covered Congress, she served as the paper's regular Supreme Court correspondent until 2008. Previously, she covered local and state government and politics for the Times in New York, and was chief of the newspaper's legislative bureau in Albany. She has appeared as a Washington Week panelist since 1980.
She is a graduate of Radcliffe College, where she currently serves on the advisory committee to the Schlesinger Library on the History of American Women. She earned a Master of Studies in Law degree from Yale Law School, and has several honorary degrees.
For her coverage of the Court, she was awarded a Pulitzer Prize in Journalism (beat reporting) in 1998. In 2004, she received the Goldsmith Career Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and the John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
For 30 years, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Linda Greenhouse chronicled the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court and its justices as a correspondent for the New York Times. In this Very Short Introduction, she draws on her deep knowledge of the court's history and of its written and unwritten rules to show readers how the Supreme Court really works. Greenhouse offers a fascinating institutional biography of a place and its people - men and women - who exercise great power but whose names and faces are unrecognized by many Americans and whose work often appears cloaked in mystery. How do cases get to the Supreme Court? How do the justices go about deciding them? What special role does the chief justice play? What do the law clerks do? How does the court relate to the other branches of government? Greenhouse answers these questions by depicting the justices as they confront deep constitutional issues or wrestle with the meaning of confusing federal statutes. Throughout, the author examines many individual Supreme Court cases to illustrate points under discussion, ranging from Marbury v. Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which struck down the District of Columbia's gun-control statute and which was, surprisingly, the first time in its history that the Court issued an authoritative interpretation of the Second Amendment. To add perspective, Greenhouse also compares the Court to foreign courts, revealing interesting differences. For instance, no other country in the world has chosen to bestow life tenure on its judges. A superb overview packed with telling details, this volume offers a matchless introduction to one of the pillars of American government.
發表於2024-11-25
The U.S. Supreme Court 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
對於英美法係和美國最高法院,平時在好萊塢電影,美劇和TVB律政劇裏麵多有涉獵,但是多數人容易流於淺錶,産生很多臆測的觀念,少有機會係統梳理其中的來龍去脈,也容易産生一些不切實際的美好想法。 美國最高法院通識讀本給瞭一個這樣的機會,書很短,通讀過後,...
評分申欣旺/文 一群中國人,熱切地讀一本關於美國最高法院的書,這種現象多少有點令人感覺復雜。最近《美國最高法院通識讀本》中譯本麵世,很快便在銷售排行榜上占據重要位置。 這是一本很“簡單”的書。和中國的作者習慣大部頭不一樣,整本書翻譯成中文,不過寥寥100頁...
評分譯本很短,對最高法院的解讀限於以美國《憲法》第三條規定的範圍,並無其它解讀。總而言,內容過少,齣版時可能為使小本略顯厚度,而附瞭大量英文索引入譯詞,並將原版英文附注於後,正文內容約296頁,中文譯文僅占105頁,原文其它約190頁,可見內容之少,僅約三分之一餘。
評分在美國,政府的行政分支和立法分支屬於政治分支,因為他們由人民選舉産生,目的是為公共事務作決策。而製憲者設置司法分支,不是為瞭讓它成為反映多數人意誌的工具,因此,不能把法院看做政治機構。正是基於上述原因,最高法院嚮來認為,政治問題應該交給政治分支解決,法院不...
評分記得法院組織我們到中學進行普法宣傳的時候,老師嚮好幾百號學生介紹說今天請律師來我們校進行青春路上,我們與法同行的講座。那一瞬間,我愣住瞭。我雖然知道身邊很多人對法官和律師分不清楚,但是,我萬萬沒想到的是作為授業解惑的老師居然也分不清二者區彆。那一刻,...
圖書標籤: 法律 美國 法學 法律與法學 曆史 美國聯邦最高法院 VSI 科普
從其誕生伊始,最高法院就以法律技術問題之名行司法能動主義之實。羅伯茨再唱謙遜的高調就顯得虛僞。這本書本身讀起來酣暢淋灕,富於富有洞見的細節,又不失全麵,是VSI係列中的上品。
評分傳說有瞭譯本
評分A good framework to understand the us Supreme Court for casual readers. 最後提供的擴展閱讀書單也很有幫助。
評分傳說有瞭譯本
評分簡明扼要、主旨清晰,讀時酣暢淋灕,讀完意猶未盡,也的確如這本書的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
The U.S. Supreme Court 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載