杰克·M.巴尔金(Jack M.Balkin,1956一),现任耶鲁大学法学院宪法学与第一修正案奈特教授,耶鲁大学信息社会项目创始人和负责人、耶鲁大学奈特法律和传媒项目负责人、艾布拉姆斯表达自由学会负责人、美国艺术与科学学院院士,并创建法律博客“巴尔金之家”(Balkinization)。1978年和1981年分别获得哈佛大学学士学位和法律博士学位,1995年获得剑桥大学哲学博士学位。主要代表作有:《活的原旨主义》(Living Originalism,Harvard University Press,2011)、《宪法救赎:对不公世界的政治信仰》(Constitutional Redemption:Political Faith in an Unjust World,Harvard University Press,2011);《2020年的宪法》(与丽娃·西格尔合编)(The Constitution in 2020,Oxford University Press,2009);《文化软件:一种意识形态理论》(Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology.Yale University Press,1998)等。
发表于2024-11-16
Living Originalism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 美国宪法 法学 【pdf已存】 美国史 法学·公法·比较·美 法学-宪法学 比较宪政·美 杰克·巴尔金[Jack·Balkin]
Originalism and living constitutionalism, so often understood to be diametrically opposing views of our nation's founding document, are not in conflict--they are compatible. So argues Jack Balkin, one of the leading constitutional scholars of our time, in this long-awaited book. Step by step, Balkin gracefully outlines a constitutional theory that demonstrates why modern conceptions of civil rights and civil liberties, and the modern state's protection of national security, health, safety, and the environment, are fully consistent with the Constitution's original meaning. And he shows how both liberals and conservatives, working through political parties and social movements, play important roles in the ongoing project of constitutional construction. By making firm rules but also deliberately incorporating flexible standards and abstract principles, the Constitution's authors constructed a framework for politics on which later generations could build. Americans have taken up this task, producing institutions and doctrines that flesh out the Constitution's text and principles. Balkin's analysis offers a way past the angry polemics of our era, a deepened understanding of the Constitution that is at once originalist and living constitutionalist, and a vision that allows all Americans to reclaim the Constitution as their own.
美国宪法的启蒙老师巴尔金的作品。作者认为原旨主义和活的宪法并非不可调和,因原旨主义的核心并非在于创立宪法的一代人的expected application,相反,真正忠于宪法本意的解读应注重宪法所开创的结构。根据结构原旨主义,当宪法中使用抽象模糊词汇(如“平等保护”“正当程序”时),我们应当认为创立者的本意就是寄希望于每一代的美国人通过自身的政治实践和发声来给予这些词汇实质。 相比阿克曼,阿克曼认为美国宪法在重建时期和罗斯福新政时期通过“我们人民”的发声经历了重大改变,巴尔金则更加强调宪法含义改变的连续性:每一代美国人都在不断的建构宪法的含义,因此巴尔金认为罗斯福新政以及民权运动的成果符合宪法的本意,也可以被放入原旨主义的框架中。行文上,与阿克曼简洁明快风格相较,巴尔金略显拖沓。
评分在"Framework Originalism and the Living Constitution," Northwestern University Law Review 2009, 103文章基础上扩展而成
评分在"Framework Originalism and the Living Constitution," Northwestern University Law Review 2009, 103文章基础上扩展而成
评分美国宪法的启蒙老师巴尔金的作品。作者认为原旨主义和活的宪法并非不可调和,因原旨主义的核心并非在于创立宪法的一代人的expected application,相反,真正忠于宪法本意的解读应注重宪法所开创的结构。根据结构原旨主义,当宪法中使用抽象模糊词汇(如“平等保护”“正当程序”时),我们应当认为创立者的本意就是寄希望于每一代的美国人通过自身的政治实践和发声来给予这些词汇实质。 相比阿克曼,阿克曼认为美国宪法在重建时期和罗斯福新政时期通过“我们人民”的发声经历了重大改变,巴尔金则更加强调宪法含义改变的连续性:每一代美国人都在不断的建构宪法的含义,因此巴尔金认为罗斯福新政以及民权运动的成果符合宪法的本意,也可以被放入原旨主义的框架中。行文上,与阿克曼简洁明快风格相较,巴尔金略显拖沓。
评分在"Framework Originalism and the Living Constitution," Northwestern University Law Review 2009, 103文章基础上扩展而成
Living Originalism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书