Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Harvard classics professor Krebs writes a scholarly but lucid account of the abuse of history. Written in 98 C.E. by the Roman official Tacitus, About the Origin and Mores of the Germanic Peoples was lost for centuries but resurfaced around 1500 as Germans were growing resentful of foreign domination—in this case from the Catholic Church in Rome. The rediscovered book launched a primitivist myth that captivated admirers over the next 500 years, from Martin Luther to Heinrich Himmler, who loved its portrayal of ancient Germans as freedom-loving warriors, uncultured but honorable, in contrast to decadent Romans. In fact, Tacitus probably never visited Germany, Krebs notes. Rather, using books and travelers' reports, he wrote for a Roman audience who shared his romantic view of northern barbarians. Enthusiastic German readers, culminating in the Nazis, ignored Tacitus's disparaging comments, misread passages to confirm their prejudices, and proclaimed that the ancient historian confirmed their national superiority. This is an inventive analysis of, and warning against, an irresistible human yearning to find written proof of one's ideology. Illus. (May)
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Review
“A razor-sharp, eminently readable reminder of the potency of bad ideas. Christopher Krebs shows how intellectuals through the ages used and abused a Latin classic, Tacitus's Germania, and tells the unnerving story of its final transformation into a Nazi 'bible'. Fascinating stuff.” (Anthony Everitt , author of Hadrian and the Triumph of Rome )
“A most exciting book! In Krebs’ hands, the story of the Germania manuscript becomes part thriller, part detective story.... A must-read for anyone interested in the pernicious power of the ideas of antiquity—and a timely reminder of the responsibilities placed on readers as well as writers.” (Tim Rood, University of Oxford, author of American Anabasis )
“A fascinating story of how a book could be used and—especially—abused over two thousand years, as enemies saw it as presenting Germans as brutish and barbarian, while German nationalistic pride extracted a quite different message of a nation that was simple, virtuous, and pure.... beautifully told by Christopher Krebs.” (Christopher Pelling, editor of Greek Tragedy and the Historian )
The pope wanted it, Montesquieu used it, and the Nazis pilfered an Italian noble's villa to get it: the Germania, by the Roman historian Tacitus, took on a life of its own as both an object and an ideology. When Tacitus wrote a not-very-flattering little book about the ancient Germans in 98 CE, at the height of the Roman Empire, he could not have foreseen that the Nazis would extol it as "a bible," nor that Heinrich Himmler, the engineer of the Holocaust, would vow to resurrect Germany on its grounds. But the Germania inspired—and polarized—readers long before the rise of the Third Reich. In this elegant and captivating history, Christopher B. Krebs, a professor of classics at Harvard University, traces the wide-ranging influence of the Germania over a five-hundred-year span, showing us how an ancient text rose to take its place among the most dangerous books in the world.
發表於2025-01-03
A Most Dangerous Book 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
當納粹士兵高舉《我的奮鬥》橫行歐洲,瘋狂推進種族主義純潔血統之時,有多少人知道他們的精神源泉竟來自《日耳曼尼亞誌》?我曾粗略看過此書,不得要領,不曾想這本書竟是史上最危險的書。書買來看瞭一部分,不覺拍案驚奇。此書絕對有價值,接受史的觀念在國內很少為人所知卻...
評分在當當雲閱讀隨便找的一本書。選題相當巧妙,通過古羅馬曆史學傢塔西陀《日耳曼尼亞誌》從創作到流傳的全過程,揭示一部原本無害的典籍是如何在不同時代被各種政治目的利用,最後竟被用來為種族主義背書,給20世紀最恐怖的暴行之一推波助瀾,令人不寒而栗。 塔西佗在《日耳曼尼...
評分空間與微博經常會有一些很俗氣很直接的文章與段子,被大量轉發,比如“遇到這樣的男人你就嫁瞭吧”。轉發的人未必認可這樣的文字,而是她們需要這樣的文字來錶明自己的態度,情緒上指給有心人聽。 可是,這和這本書有什麼關係瞭,如你所想,可能一點關係都沒有。人類,有很多辦...
評分 評分15世紀人文主義者坎帕諾以塔西佗所著《日耳曼尼亞誌》中的描述為基礎,寫道: “當一個青年男性作為一個成人開始進入社會時,這個青年會得到一麵盾和一支矛來學習技藝,迴報社群對他的期望;甚至是丈夫帶入婚姻的財産中也包含瞭武器。原因很簡單,‘沒有武器什麼也做不成’”。...
圖書標籤: 政治學 歐洲研究 塔西佗 英文原版 政治哲學 想讀“最危險的書” 新書記 德國
作為一份特定文本的傳播/文化/思想史還是挺有意思的,但是整個thesis感覺沒有argue得特彆好,而更多是按時間順序堆砌塔西陀的文本在不同作者筆下或中心或邊緣的存在,作者所說的依照斯金納式的治思想史思路則很難看到,甚至有點反其道而行的樣子。。。
評分作為一份特定文本的傳播/文化/思想史還是挺有意思的,但是整個thesis感覺沒有argue得特彆好,而更多是按時間順序堆砌塔西陀的文本在不同作者筆下或中心或邊緣的存在,作者所說的依照斯金納式的治思想史思路則很難看到,甚至有點反其道而行的樣子。。。
評分無曆史=無政治
評分無曆史=無政治
評分作為一份特定文本的傳播/文化/思想史還是挺有意思的,但是整個thesis感覺沒有argue得特彆好,而更多是按時間順序堆砌塔西陀的文本在不同作者筆下或中心或邊緣的存在,作者所說的依照斯金納式的治思想史思路則很難看到,甚至有點反其道而行的樣子。。。
A Most Dangerous Book 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載