James C. Scott (born December 2, 1936) is a American Sterling Professor of Political Science and Anthropology at Yale University. He is also the director of the Program in Agrarian Studies and a noted anarchist scholar.Scott is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, has held grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, and has been a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Science, Science, Technology and Society Program at M.I.T., and the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
Scott lives in Connecticut, where he raises sheep.He received his bachelor's degree from Williams College and his MA and PhD (political science, 1967) from Yale. He taught at the University of Wisconsin–Madison until 1976, when he returned to Yale.
James Scott taught us what's wrong with seeing like a state. Now, in his most accessible and personal book to date, the acclaimed social scientist makes the case for seeing like an anarchist. Inspired by the core anarchist faith in the possibilities of voluntary cooperation without hierarchy, "Two Cheers for Anarchism" is an engaging, high-spirited, and often very funny defense of an anarchist way of seeing - one that provides a unique and powerful perspective on everything from everyday social and political interactions to mass protests and revolutions. Through a wide-ranging series of memorable anecdotes and examples, the book describes an anarchist sensibility that celebrates the local knowledge, common sense, and creativity of ordinary people. The result is a kind of handbook on constructive anarchism that challenges us to radically reconsider the value of hierarchy in public and private life, from schools and workplaces to retirement homes and government itself. Beginning with what Scott calls "the law of anarchist calisthenics," an argument for law-breaking inspired by an East German pedestrian crossing, each chapter opens with a story that captures an essential anarchist "truth." In the course of telling these stories, Scott touches on a wide variety of subjects: public disorder and riots, desertion, poaching, vernacular knowledge, assembly-line production, globalization, the petty bourgeoisie, school testing, playgrounds, and the practice of historical explanation. Far from a dogmatic manifesto, "Two Cheers for Anarchism" celebrates the anarchist confidence in the inventiveness and judgment of people who are free to exercise their creative and moral capacities.
發表於2024-12-22
Two Cheers for Anarchism 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
為何無政府主義?--對大變革失去信心。每一場成功的革命總會造就一個更強力的政府;西方陣營也隻通過努力發展強化國傢、強化不平等。 何為無政府主義?--互助關係。不經等級製度和國傢製度達成的閤作。 作者的無政府主義觀?- ”過程取嚮的、作為行事方式“的無政府主義: 反對...
評分無政府主義視野下突齣的一點:一是互助關係,一是無政府主義對混亂、對社會性學習後産生的即興行為的容忍,以及無政府主義對自發閤作、自發互惠的信心。 結構性暴力,市場原教旨主義, 正式組織手執國傢權力的繮繩,用製度化的途徑操控國傢權力。 體製之外的抗議是結構上發生漸...
評分為何無政府主義?--對大變革失去信心。每一場成功的革命總會造就一個更強力的政府;西方陣營也隻通過努力發展強化國傢、強化不平等。 何為無政府主義?--互助關係。不經等級製度和國傢製度達成的閤作。 作者的無政府主義觀?- ”過程取嚮的、作為行事方式“的無政府主義: 反對...
評分第六章——具體性與流變對我個人的啓發性最大 以下是全文的部分書摘。 1. 2. 不瞭解行動者自己對境遇的認知,就不能有效地認識行動者的境遇 3. 悖論:公共秩序遭受的破壞和擾亂對民主製度下的政治變革産生瞭積極的作用 4. 禮貌而和平的訴求極少促成結構性的變革 5. 把外觀上的...
評分無政府主義視野下突齣的一點:一是互助關係,一是無政府主義對混亂、對社會性學習後産生的即興行為的容忍,以及無政府主義對自發閤作、自發互惠的信心。 結構性暴力,市場原教旨主義, 正式組織手執國傢權力的繮繩,用製度化的途徑操控國傢權力。 體製之外的抗議是結構上發生漸...
圖書標籤: 政治學 無政府主義 社會學 美國 Scott Anarchism 比較政治 斯科特
好吧,和V字仇殺隊一起看。。。我記得我昨晚還想說要把那什麼和什麼一起看來著????不記得瞭。。想起來瞭,文革和Scott。。不過,高王淩好像已經做瞭這方麵的研究瞭。。那我到底是想說啥來著???
評分不知道大傢為啥評價不甚高,我還挺喜歡的
評分好吧,和V字仇殺隊一起看。。。我記得我昨晚還想說要把那什麼和什麼一起看來著????不記得瞭。。想起來瞭,文革和Scott。。不過,高王淩好像已經做瞭這方麵的研究瞭。。那我到底是想說啥來著???
評分不知道大傢為啥評價不甚高,我還挺喜歡的
評分不想把斯氏大部頭著作通讀的,可讀此書作為概述。所謂片段式寫作使具有更多親和力一說無甚體會。談小資産階級在保護自發創新和交易、維係社會紐帶和保守小資産創造更公平社會一節估計會令視老斯為盟友的左派氣得跳腳,以取消紅綠燈為例子證明有時候少些規則反而更安全一文讀得很想請他來中國體會下交通狀況,罵量化方法、標準化考試、論文引用數和齣版數評教授一節又會令高教從業者和學生心有戚戚。總而言之斯氏終於挑明瞭自己在普遍意義上的反體製主義立場,可能比所謂無政府主義更進一步:組織、科層、標準化、科學思維、量化方法似乎正在扼殺人類韆百年來遵循的個人或自發形成小組織的互惠互助、通過經驗積纍自發創新、同一地域/物件承擔多種功能、在無乾擾狀態下摸索經濟方法等優良傳統,而其巔峰則是晚近齣現壟斷權力的民族國傢。老憤青本色。
Two Cheers for Anarchism 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載