From colonial history to the present, Americans have passionately, even violently, debated the nature and the character of money. They have painted it and sung songs about it, organized political parties around it, and imprinted it with the name of God - all the while wondering: is money a symbol of the value of human work and creativity, or a symbol of some natural, intrinsic value? In "Face Value", Michael O'Malley provides a deep history and a penetrating analysis of American thinking about money and the ways that this ambivalence unexpectedly intertwines with race. Like race, money is bound up in questions of identity and worth, each a kind of shorthand for the different values of two similar things. O'Malley illuminates how these two socially constructed hierarchies are deeply rooted in American anxieties about authenticity and difference. In this compelling work of cultural history, O'Malley interprets a stunning array of historical sources to evaluate the comingling of ideas about monetary value and social distinctions. More than just a history, "Face Value" offers us a new way of thinking about the present culture of coded racism, gold fetishism, and economic uncertainty.
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
Malley's book is not convincing due to its lack of enough primary sources. Its method is also problematic which only do a literature closing reading of elites' thoughts without exploring the actual entanglement between money E and race in common people's daily life.
评分A selective affinity between the discourse on money and that on racism in the history of America, related to the fundamental problem that whether (economic) value is a fixed or ever-changing notion.
评分Malley's book is not convincing due to its lack of enough primary sources. Its method is also problematic which only do a literature closing reading of elites' thoughts without exploring the actual entanglement between money E and race in common people's daily life.
评分Malley's book is not convincing due to its lack of enough primary sources. Its method is also problematic which only do a literature closing reading of elites' thoughts without exploring the actual entanglement between money E and race in common people's daily life.
评分Malley's book is not convincing due to its lack of enough primary sources. Its method is also problematic which only do a literature closing reading of elites' thoughts without exploring the actual entanglement between money E and race in common people's daily life.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有