How is the United States able to control the IMF with only 17 per cent of the votes? How are the rules of the global economy made? This book shows how a combination of formal and informal rules explains how international organizations really work. Randall W. Stone argues that formal rules apply in ordinary times, while informal power allows leading states to exert control when the stakes are high. International organizations are therefore best understood as equilibrium outcomes that balance the power and interests of the leading state and the member countries. Presenting a new model of institutional design and comparing the IMF, WTO, and EU, Stone argues that institutional variations reflect the distribution of power and interests. He shows that US interests influence the size, terms, and enforcement of IMF programs, and new data, archival documents, and interviews reveal the shortcomings of IMF programs in Mexico, Russia, Korea, Indonesia, and Argentina.
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
IMF那章不错；不留痕迹的放下了很多implication，这点很高明；model的可扩展性也不错；formal model+定性+定量的典型作品，值得学习；理论上和rational design试图划清界限，但informal power和formal power的区分略二；比较静态分析，虽说动态分析实际上在这里加不进去。
评分IMF那章不错；不留痕迹的放下了很多implication，这点很高明；model的可扩展性也不错；formal model+定性+定量的典型作品，值得学习；理论上和rational design试图划清界限，但informal power和formal power的区分略二；比较静态分析，虽说动态分析实际上在这里加不进去。
评分IMF那章不错；不留痕迹的放下了很多implication，这点很高明；model的可扩展性也不错；formal model+定性+定量的典型作品，值得学习；理论上和rational design试图划清界限，但informal power和formal power的区分略二；比较静态分析，虽说动态分析实际上在这里加不进去。
评分IMF那章不错；不留痕迹的放下了很多implication，这点很高明；model的可扩展性也不错；formal model+定性+定量的典型作品，值得学习；理论上和rational design试图划清界限，但informal power和formal power的区分略二；比较静态分析，虽说动态分析实际上在这里加不进去。
评分IMF那章不错；不留痕迹的放下了很多implication，这点很高明；model的可扩展性也不错；formal model+定性+定量的典型作品，值得学习；理论上和rational design试图划清界限，但informal power和formal power的区分略二；比较静态分析，虽说动态分析实际上在这里加不进去。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有