Faces of the State is a penetrating study of the production of a state-revering political culture in the public life of 1990s Turkey. In this new contribution to the anthropology of the state, Yael Navaro-Yashin brings recent poststructuralist and psychoanalytic theory to bear on the study of the political. Delving deeper than studies of nationalist discourse that would focus on consciously articulated narratives of political identity, the author explores sites of "fantasy" in the public-political domain of Istanbul. The book focuses on the conflict over secularism in the aftermath of an Islamist victory in the city's municipalities. In contrast with studies that would problematize and objectify religious movements, the author examines the agency of secularists under a state widely known for its "secularist" policies. The complexity and dynamism of the context studied moves well beyond scholarly distinctions between "secularity" and "religion," as well as "state" and "society." Here, secularism and Islamism emerge as different guises for a culture of statism where people from "society" compete to claim "Turkish culture" for themselves and their life practices. With this work that stretches the boundaries of regionalism, the author situates her anthropological study of Turkey not only in scholarship on the Middle East, but also in the broader problem of thinking "Europe" anew.
發表於2024-11-07
Faces of the State 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 人類學 turkey secularism religion polisci
第一部分集中講文化政治,包括伊斯蘭與世俗主義者對於“當地文化”的擅用和衝突、土耳其作為歐洲的他者,和伊斯蘭/世俗主義的“文化經濟”。第二部分用瞭Žižek和Lacan(沒有讀懂為什麼fantasy就比Abrams的idea和Taussig的fetish好),argue“國傢”是一種想象和建構,公民在公共生活的點滴中不斷加強對“國傢”的感知,而cynicism是將之內化的重要途徑;最後一章對Ataturk作為icon的崇拜也挺有意思的。總體來看有點形散,但是作者文筆流暢讀起來特彆享受=)
評分第一部分集中講文化政治,包括伊斯蘭與世俗主義者對於“當地文化”的擅用和衝突、土耳其作為歐洲的他者,和伊斯蘭/世俗主義的“文化經濟”。第二部分用瞭Žižek和Lacan(沒有讀懂為什麼fantasy就比Abrams的idea和Taussig的fetish好),argue“國傢”是一種想象和建構,公民在公共生活的點滴中不斷加強對“國傢”的感知,而cynicism是將之內化的重要途徑;最後一章對Ataturk作為icon的崇拜也挺有意思的。總體來看有點形散,但是作者文筆流暢讀起來特彆享受=)
評分第一部分集中講文化政治,包括伊斯蘭與世俗主義者對於“當地文化”的擅用和衝突、土耳其作為歐洲的他者,和伊斯蘭/世俗主義的“文化經濟”。第二部分用瞭Žižek和Lacan(沒有讀懂為什麼fantasy就比Abrams的idea和Taussig的fetish好),argue“國傢”是一種想象和建構,公民在公共生活的點滴中不斷加強對“國傢”的感知,而cynicism是將之內化的重要途徑;最後一章對Ataturk作為icon的崇拜也挺有意思的。總體來看有點形散,但是作者文筆流暢讀起來特彆享受=)
評分第一部分集中講文化政治,包括伊斯蘭與世俗主義者對於“當地文化”的擅用和衝突、土耳其作為歐洲的他者,和伊斯蘭/世俗主義的“文化經濟”。第二部分用瞭Žižek和Lacan(沒有讀懂為什麼fantasy就比Abrams的idea和Taussig的fetish好),argue“國傢”是一種想象和建構,公民在公共生活的點滴中不斷加強對“國傢”的感知,而cynicism是將之內化的重要途徑;最後一章對Ataturk作為icon的崇拜也挺有意思的。總體來看有點形散,但是作者文筆流暢讀起來特彆享受=)
評分第一部分集中講文化政治,包括伊斯蘭與世俗主義者對於“當地文化”的擅用和衝突、土耳其作為歐洲的他者,和伊斯蘭/世俗主義的“文化經濟”。第二部分用瞭Žižek和Lacan(沒有讀懂為什麼fantasy就比Abrams的idea和Taussig的fetish好),argue“國傢”是一種想象和建構,公民在公共生活的點滴中不斷加強對“國傢”的感知,而cynicism是將之內化的重要途徑;最後一章對Ataturk作為icon的崇拜也挺有意思的。總體來看有點形散,但是作者文筆流暢讀起來特彆享受=)
Faces of the State 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載