The Reckless Mind

马克•里拉(Mark Lilla)，美国芝加哥大学社会思想委员会教授，欧洲思想史学者，被誉为美国自由主义阵营的一支健笔。作为公共知识分子的他在欧美具有相当的知名度和影响力，著有《Ｇ.Ｂ.维科：一个反现代者的形成》(1993)，编有《新法兰西思想：政治哲学》(1994)，《伯林的遗产》(2001)。

出版者:New York Review Books

作者:Mark Lilla

页数:236

出版时间:2003-8-31

价格:USD 17.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9781590170717

图书标签:MarkLilla知识分子哲学哲人与政治Intellectual学术【政治学】liberalism

European history of the past century is full of examples of philosophers, writers, and jurists who, whether they lived in democratic, communist, or fascist societies, supported and defended totalitarian principles and horrific regimes. But how can intellectuals, who should be alert to the evils of tyranny, betray the ideals of freedom and independent inquiry? How can they take positions that, implicitly or not, endorse oppression and human suffering on a vast scale?

In profiles of Martin Heidegger, Carl Schmitt, Walter Benjamin, Alexandre Kojeve, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, Mark Lilla demonstrates how these thinkers were so deluded by the ideologies and convulsions of their times that they closed their eyes to authoritarianism, brutality, and state terror. He shows how intellectuals who fail to master their passions can be driven into a political sphere they scarcely understand, with momentous results for our intellectual and political lives.

读后感

确实只是“遇到”而已 ——评《当知识分子遇到政治》 文|杜子腾 一直以来就特别关注知识分子与政治的互动关系，特别是当自己还处在一个对知识分子的态度有过山车般变化的国度，这种关注就显得特别迫切。这是未读本书前很多读者都会抱有的期待心态，我们急切的想看一看那些国外...  

●阅读前的准备 所谓准备，并不是要求你对于《当知识分子遇到政治》一书中所涉及的六位知识分子（分别是海德格尔、施米特、本雅明、福柯、德里达）的日常生活、学术理论、政治参与有多么全面的了解，而是要以一种旁观者的心态，既不是他们学术理论的脑残粉，亦不是他们...  

确实只是“遇到”而已 ——评《当知识分子遇到政治》 文|杜子腾 一直以来就特别关注知识分子与政治的互动关系，特别是当自己还处在一个对知识分子的态度有过山车般变化的国度，这种关注就显得特别迫切。这是未读本书前很多读者都会抱有的期待心态，我们急切的想看一看那些国外...  

用户评价

Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德里达章最后几小节有助厘清纷乱思潮。

very readable

Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德里达章最后几小节有助厘清纷乱思潮。

Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德里达章最后几小节有助厘清纷乱思潮。

very readable