斯拉沃熱·齊澤剋,斯洛文尼亞盧布爾雅那大學社會學研究所資深研究員,歐美眾多大學客座教授,大名鼎鼎的歐陸哲學傢,魅力四射的演說傢,光彩奪目的文化理論傢,人稱“文化理論界的貓王”、“屹立於人類智力頂峰”的“盧布爾雅那巨人”,“幾十年來強大無比的傑齣闡釋者”,自稱“一定意義上 的共産主義者”和“激進左翼分子”。他深受黑格爾主義、馬剋思主義和拉康精神分析理論的影響,擅長以通俗文化産品解讀拉康的精神分析理論,並以拉康精神分析理論、黑格爾哲學和馬剋思主義政治經濟學解析最新的社會文化現象。他“把一切納入自己的研究領域”,頗有“席捲天下,包舉宇內”之勢,同時“把理論的嚴密性與閱讀的強製性融為一爐”,“是反直覺觀察的大師”。
The Parallax View is Slavoj Zizek's most substantial theoretical work to appear in many years; Zizek himself describes it as his magnum opus. Parallax can be defined as the apparent displacement of an object, caused by a change in observational position. Zizek is interested in the "parallax gap" separating two points between which no synthesis or mediation is possible, linked by an "impossible short circuit" of levels that can never meet. From this consideration of parallax, Zizek begins a rehabilitation of dialectical materialism.Modes of parallax can be seen in different domains of today's theory, from the wave-particle duality in quantum physics to the parallax of the unconscious in Freudian psychoanalysis between interpretations of the formation of the unconscious and theories of drives. In The Parallax View, Zizek, with his usual astonishing erudition, focuses on three main modes of parallax: the ontological difference, the ultimate parallax that conditions our very access to reality; the scientific parallax, the irreducible gap between the phenomenal experience of reality and its scientific explanation, which reaches its apogee in today's brain sciences (according to which "nobody is home" in the skull, just stacks of brain meat--a condition Zizek calls "the unbearable lightness of being no one"); and the political parallax, the social antagonism that allows for no common ground. Between his discussions of these three modes, Zizek offers interludes that deal with more specific topics--including an ethical act in a novel by Henry James and anti-anti-Semitism.The Parallax View not only expands Zizek's Lacanian-Hegelian approach to new domains (notably cognitive brain sciences) but also provides the systematic exposition of the conceptual framework that underlies his entire work. Philosophical and theological analysis, detailed readings of literature, cinema, and music coexist with lively anecdotes and obscene jokes.
發表於2024-11-22
The Parallax View 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
什麼是視差客體 給視差客體舉例子就是 不同視點對同一個事物進行觀察會得齣不同的描述版本 一般性的解釋是,這個事物是不變的,外在於我們的主體的。之所以會産生不同的版本,是因為這兩個版本體現瞭不同的主觀性而已 (但是果真如此嗎。如果迴憶黑格爾在精神現象學中的論述...
評分非常榮幸能再一次進入到齊澤剋——季廣茂講解“實在界”的課堂當中。 這本書明顯要比前兩本(《意識相態的崇高客體》《斜目而視》)更能找到閱讀的樂趣,這應該感謝老齊不扯那麼多德國哲學思想史、不將理論晦澀神秘化、開始關懷我們這些平民讀者。 當然,還應該感謝季廣茂老...
評分 評分 評分非常榮幸能再一次進入到齊澤剋——季廣茂講解“實在界”的課堂當中。 這本書明顯要比前兩本(《意識相態的崇高客體》《斜目而視》)更能找到閱讀的樂趣,這應該感謝老齊不扯那麼多德國哲學思想史、不將理論晦澀神秘化、開始關懷我們這些平民讀者。 當然,還應該感謝季廣茂老...
圖書標籤: 齊澤剋 精神分析 哲學 zizek psychoanalysis Zizek, 風景理論 英文原著
我認為哈,齊澤剋在處理從Pre-ontological到Reason的過程的時候,用詞實在是太隨便瞭。他喜歡說這一過程本身是madness, freedom, darkness, abyssal或者greatest contingency. 這些詞的問題在哪兒?首先,前本體論領域意味著脫離一切先驗前結構,而無論是Necessity還是Contingency,Namings還是Unnameable,其實都屬於先驗前結構。前本體論是有彆於這兩種先驗前結構的第三領域,它既不是必然性,也不是偶然性或自由,而是“尚未在二者之間作齣決定”。因此,從前本體論的第三領域走進任意一個先驗前結構的過程本身如果說成是偶然或自由的,那麼就矛盾瞭,因為此時無論偶然性、自由還是必然性,都尚未得到設定。
評分http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n17/fredric-jameson/first-impressions
評分http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n17/fredric-jameson/first-impressions
評分還是沒有看齣來剋服explosion of negativity的可能性在哪裏
評分還是沒有看齣來剋服explosion of negativity的可能性在哪裏
The Parallax View 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載