On October 25, 1946, in a crowded room in Cambridge, England, the great twentieth-century philosophers Ludwig Wittgenstein and Karl Popper came face to face for the first and only time. The meeting -- which lasted ten minutes -- did not go well. Their loud and aggressive confrontation became the stuff of instant legend, but precisely what happened during that brief confrontation remained for decades the subject of intense disagreement. An engaging mix of philosophy, history, biography, and literary detection, Wittgenstein's Poker explores, through the Popper/Wittgenstein confrontation, the history of philosophy in the twentieth century. It evokes the tumult of fin-de-siécle Vienna, Wittgentein's and Popper's birthplace; the tragedy of the Nazi takeover of Austria; and postwar Cambridge University, with its eccentric set of philosophy dons, including Bertrand Russell. At the center of the story stand the two giants of philosophy themselves -- proud, irascible, larger than life -- and spoiling for a fight.
1946年10月25日,在劍橋道德科學俱樂部,兩位哲學大佬,維特根斯坦與波普爾,發生瞭一場十分鍾的爭吵。濛剋的《維特根斯坦傳》對此有半頁的描述,而本書對這場衝突進行瞭深度挖掘和解讀,以大事件敘述風格,展現瞭這場衝突的豐富場景。兩位哲學傢主角以及作為第三員大佬的羅素...
評分關於Wittgenstein, Russell, Popper的哲學辯論,寫得像是偵探小說一樣,看著很過癮.
評分 評分1946年10月25日,在劍橋道德科學俱樂部,兩位哲學大佬,維特根斯坦與波普爾,發生瞭一場十分鍾的爭吵。濛剋的《維特根斯坦傳》對此有半頁的描述,而本書對這場衝突進行瞭深度挖掘和解讀,以大事件敘述風格,展現瞭這場衝突的豐富場景。兩位哲學傢主角以及作為第三員大佬的羅素...
評分去資料室找弗雷格的資料卻無意間在書架上發現瞭找瞭好久的《維特根斯坦的撥火棍》。想讀它的原因十分直接,我是W的迷戀者。 要說《撥火棍》的作者是記者是個大好事,記者讓我想起瞭狗仔,狗仔讓我想起瞭八卦,八卦讓我想起瞭W打噴嚏的樣子,顯然,這本書那麼有趣就是因為它知...
Worthwhile entertainment
评分我想我大概永遠不會去把這本書讀完瞭 :)
评分egregiously mean-spirited (towards popper)
评分我想我大概永遠不會去把這本書讀完瞭 :)
评分Worthwhile entertainment
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有