Rightly fearing that unscrupulous rulers would break them up, seize their resources, or submit them to damaging forms of intervention, strong networks of trust such as kinship groups, clandestine religious sects, and trade diasporas have historically insulated themselves from political control by a variety of strategies. Drawing on a vast range of comparisons over time and space, Charles Tilly asks and answers how, and with what consequences, members of trust networks have evaded, compromised with, or even sought connections with political regimes.
跟《民主》一起看。将国家建构的过程视为不同路径下私人信任网络的整合,蒂利真是极具洞见的学者。写作风格太碎片化了,可能吃了点亏。
评分跟《民主》一起看。将国家建构的过程视为不同路径下私人信任网络的整合,蒂利真是极具洞见的学者。写作风格太碎片化了,可能吃了点亏。
评分跟《民主》一起看。将国家建构的过程视为不同路径下私人信任网络的整合,蒂利真是极具洞见的学者。写作风格太碎片化了,可能吃了点亏。
评分跟《民主》一起看。将国家建构的过程视为不同路径下私人信任网络的整合,蒂利真是极具洞见的学者。写作风格太碎片化了,可能吃了点亏。
评分跟《民主》一起看。将国家建构的过程视为不同路径下私人信任网络的整合,蒂利真是极具洞见的学者。写作风格太碎片化了,可能吃了点亏。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有