James Mahoney is a comparative-historical researcher with interests in socioeconomic development, political regimes, and methodology. His most recent books are Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in Comparative Perspective (2010) and Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (2010; co-edited with Kathleen Thelen). He is also the author of The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America (2001) and co-editor of Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (2003; with Dietrich Rueschemeyer).
His book Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in Comparative Perspective won four major awards from the American Sociological Association and American Political Science Association.
His article publications feature work on political and socioeconomic development in Latin America, path dependence in historical sociology, and causal inference in small-N analysis. Mahoney is a past President of the American Political Science Association (APSA) Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, and he is Chair of the American Sociological Association Section for Comparative and Historical Sociology.
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is a Brown professor of sociology emeritus and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor of International Studies emeritus. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.
He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.
His books include Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research (Princeton University Press, forthcoming in 2009); Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambribge University Press, 2003, co-edited with J. Mahoney); Participation and Democracy East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations (M. E. Sharpe, 1998, co-edited with M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock); States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton University Press, 1996, co-edited with Th. Skocpol); Capitalist Development and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1992, co-authored with E. H. Stephens and J. D. Stephen); Power and the Division of Labour (Stanford University Press, 1986); and Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985, co-edited with P.B. Evans and Th. Skocpol).
He received his doctorate in sociology at the University of Cologne. Before coming to Brown, he taught at the University of Cologne, Dartmouth College, and the University of Toronto. He also taught at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Free University of Berlin, and the Free University of Brussels.
发表于2024-11-21
Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
这本书是我的最爱,中译本据说在翻译中。贴一下我整理的材料吧。 编者简介: 詹姆斯·马奥尼,西北大学戈登·富尔彻讲席教授,政治学系副主任,美国社会学会比较与历史社会学专业委员会前主任。 迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,布朗大学查尔斯·C. 蒂林哈斯特荣休讲席教授。 内容简介...
评分这本书是我的最爱,中译本据说在翻译中。贴一下我整理的材料吧。 编者简介: 詹姆斯·马奥尼,西北大学戈登·富尔彻讲席教授,政治学系副主任,美国社会学会比较与历史社会学专业委员会前主任。 迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,布朗大学查尔斯·C. 蒂林哈斯特荣休讲席教授。 内容简介...
评分这本书是我的最爱,中译本据说在翻译中。贴一下我整理的材料吧。 编者简介: 詹姆斯·马奥尼,西北大学戈登·富尔彻讲席教授,政治学系副主任,美国社会学会比较与历史社会学专业委员会前主任。 迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,布朗大学查尔斯·C. 蒂林哈斯特荣休讲席教授。 内容简介...
评分这本书是我的最爱,中译本据说在翻译中。贴一下我整理的材料吧。 编者简介: 詹姆斯·马奥尼,西北大学戈登·富尔彻讲席教授,政治学系副主任,美国社会学会比较与历史社会学专业委员会前主任。 迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,布朗大学查尔斯·C. 蒂林哈斯特荣休讲席教授。 内容简介...
评分这本书是我的最爱,中译本据说在翻译中。贴一下我整理的材料吧。 编者简介: 詹姆斯·马奥尼,西北大学戈登·富尔彻讲席教授,政治学系副主任,美国社会学会比较与历史社会学专业委员会前主任。 迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,布朗大学查尔斯·C. 蒂林哈斯特荣休讲席教授。 内容简介...
图书标签: 历史社会学 方法论 比较政治 社会学 政治学 methodology 比较历史 HistoricalSociology
The book considers the past accomplishments and future agendas of comparative-historical research in the social sciences. It defines the distinctiveness of this type of research and explores its strengths in explaining important outcomes (e.g. revolutions, social provision, democracy) in the world. It includes sections on substantive research accomplishments, methodology, and theory, and features essays by some of the most important political scientists and sociologists currently working.
This review of the accomplishments and future agendas of comparative historical research in the social sciences explores its strengths in explaining important worldwide outcomes (e.g., revolutions, social provision, democracy). It includes sections on substantive research accomplishments, methodology, and theory, and features essays by some of the most important political scientists and sociologists currently working.
How institution evolved
评分首章和Thelen一章,入门学习。
评分读了感兴趣的五六篇,各种大牛。导论入门为主,兼有梳理总结之功。
评分一帮比较反感或少采用量化和大样本研究的学者汇编这本论文集来论证“比较历史研究法”的优点缺点,多少有一些在量化风潮下证明自己存在意义的味道。比较历史的方法当然能看到量化研究看不到的很多细微之处和因果机理,平衡理论层次和案例研究相对较好,也不会过于抽象。刚好站在科学化和反科学化、普遍化和特殊化的中间地带,有时候会遭到两边同时的批评。而且由于是比较“历史”研究,往往受到研究者和整体风潮限制,有一个案例“进入”历史的过程。量化研究似乎也无文集中所批评那么弱,其中甚至还有学者指称比较历史才是符合现在社会科学“本体论”的研究方法,量化研究乃是二三十年前本体论粗糙时代的方法,实在过于激进。想来我自己一向的研究方法也是近于此路,不过我是因数理基础不好、量化训练不足而被迫为止,而非主动选择,限制很大。
评分首章和Thelen一章,入门学习。
Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书