Leo Strauss

唐格维（Daniel Tanguay），渥太华大学哲学系副教授，政治学兼职教授。获巴黎索邦大学哲学博士学位、DEA学位；蒙特利尔大学哲学硕士；多米尼加学院哲学学士；拉瓦尔大学古典学学士。林国荣，西南政法大学教师和首都师范大学博士研究生。

出版者:Yale University Press

作者:Daniel Tanguay

页数:272

译者:Christopher Nadon

出版时间:2007-4-28

价格:USD 32.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780300109795

图书标签:施特劳斯政治哲学politicsphilosophybiographyStrauss

Since political theorist Leo Strauss' death in 1973, American interpreters have heatedly debated his intellectual legacy. Daniel Tanguay recovers Strauss from the atmosphere of partisan debate that has dominated American journalistic, political, and academic discussions of his work. Tanguay offers in crystal-clear prose the first assessment of the whole of Strauss' thought, a daunting task owing to the vastness and scope of Strauss' writings. This comprehensive overview of Strauss' thought is indispensable for anyone seeking to understand his philosophy and legacy. Tanguay gives special attention to Strauss' little-known formative years, 1920-1938, during which the philosopher elaborated the theme of his research, what he termed the 'theological-political problem'. Tanguay shows the connection of this theme to other major elements in Strauss' thought, such as the Quarrel between the Ancients and Moderns, the return to classical natural right, the art of esoteric writing, and his critique of modernity. In so doing, the author approaches what is at the heart of Strauss' work: "God and Politics". Rescuing Strauss from polemics and ill-defined generalizations about his ideas, Tanguay provides instead an important and timely analysis of a major philosophical thinker of the twentieth century.

读后感

书是好书。就是错字太多，可以看得出是拼音输入法录入的，很离谱。 吉林出版集团出了不少好书，可是怎么这本书就怎么就不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？怎么不认真呢？  

本书很直白地刻画了施特劳斯。 将施特劳斯的问题意识追溯到其犹太人处境这个“神学政治问题”，这其实是古今的交汇点，后面雅典和耶路撒冷的问题也由此导出，线条非常清晰。 我觉得施特劳斯所把握的雅典很奇异，几乎是与亚氏和传统解释的柏拉图决裂了，更不必说悲剧或史诗的雅...  

讀完丹尼爾唐格維著的列奧斯特勞斯的思想傳記，慶幸自己之前沒有浪費時間在這個無聊的靈魂上。1個偽裝的柏拉圖主義者和猶太教徒，竟然妄圖談論神學，可以說非常不靠譜了。斯特勞斯跟戴震1樣，都擅長概念辨析，以及1種並不圓融的歷史思維，尤其是當他們想要回歸到柏拉圖或者孟子...  

这本书中出现的翻译的问题，品质极差，已经超过学术可以容忍的范围。该书最多只能算是初稿，竟然堂而皇之地出版。作者的学术态度应该受到严重地质疑。 今天在豆瓣看到有关这位译者剽窃论文的文章，虽不清楚事实真伪，但其人其事，可想而知。那篇文章呼吁译者”退出学界者“，看...  

林国荣抄袭事件 http://philosophyol.com/pol/html/86/t-23386.html 看到有人评论说了一些低级错误，比如斯宾诺莎与中世纪什么的。而且发现林国荣这个人名似乎很熟悉，想起了胡文辉一篇《现代学人涉嫌剿袭举例》中提到过这个人。http://book.douban.com/review/3649384/ 我觉...

用户评价

在东大图书馆分了好多次印完它……最权威的施特劳斯思想传记

在东大图书馆分了好多次印完它……最权威的施特劳斯思想传记

在东大图书馆分了好多次印完它……最权威的施特劳斯思想传记

在东大图书馆分了好多次印完它……最权威的施特劳斯思想传记

在东大图书馆分了好多次印完它……最权威的施特劳斯思想传记