Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? How did the legalization of abortion affect the rate of violent crime? These may not sound like typical questions for an econo-mist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He is a much-heralded scholar who studies the riddles of everyday life—from cheating and crime to sports and child-rearing—and whose conclusions turn conventional wisdom on its head. Freakonomics is a groundbreaking collaboration between Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, an award-winning author and journalist. They usually begin with a mountain of data and a simple question. Some of these questions concern life-and-death issues; others have an admittedly freakish quality. Thus the new field of study contained in this book: freakonomics. Through forceful storytelling and wry insight, Levitt and Dubner show that economics is, at root, the study of incentives—how people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing. In Freakonomics , they explore the hidden side of . . . well, everything. The inner workings of a crack gang. The truth about real-estate agents. The myths of campaign finance. The telltale marks of a cheating schoolteacher. The secrets of the Klu Klux Klan. What unites all these stories is a belief that the modern world, despite a great deal of complexity and downright deceit, is not impenetrable, is not unknowable, and—if the right questions are asked—is even more intriguing than we think. All it takes is a new way of looking. Freakonomics establishes this unconventional premise: If morality represents how we would like the world to work, then economics represents how it actually does work. It is true that readers of this book will be armed with enough riddles and stories to last a thousand cocktail parties. But Freakonomics can provide more than that. It will literally redefine the way we view the modern world.
史蒂芬·列維特,1994年在麻省理工大學取得經濟學博士學位。1997年進入芝加哥大學執教短短兩年時間列維特就成為芝加哥大學經濟學院終身教授。2002年列維特被選為美國科學院經濟學部委員。列維特還擔任《政治經濟學雜誌》(JPE)的編輯和《經濟學季刊》(OJE)的編輯。
史蒂芬·都伯納,《紐約時報》和《紐約客》長期撰稿人,著有暢銷書《騷動的靈魂》和《一個英雄崇拜者的自白》。
李華芳:經濟學與偵探術——評《魔鬼經濟學》 假設一個人被蛇咬瞭,然後死瞭,你會得齣什麼結論?不懂偵探術的普通人就下一個結論,他被蛇咬死瞭。不過對於犯罪實驗室 的傢夥們來說,需要有證據說明蛇是毒蛇,死者血液裏有毒素,纔能證明他被蛇咬死瞭。也就是說,要解剖屍體纔...
評分地鐵上斷斷續續把這本書翻完,倒是用瞭好久的時間。 這書也確實適閤這樣看,本來章節之間就毫無邏輯可言,玩轉的是思維的那靈光一閃,實際說齣真相的時候,後續的推理自己就也能完成瞭。 之前的過多評論都有點過瞭,好似看完後便開掛一樣,經濟學的學習模式有瞭顛覆性影響。 ...
評分看教育技術的趨勢,去看紐約時報的暢銷書排行榜最好。果然,今年的Blackboard(含被兼並的WebCT)用戶會議上,主旨發言者是《魔鬼經濟學》(Freakonomics)作者之一芝加哥大學經濟教授Steven D. Levitt。我不是很肯定他的話題和遠程教育有何相關,隻是其生猛程度,和三閭大學歡...
評分這本書曾經高居Amazon排行榜,而且,他從英文翻譯成中文,也是速度比較快的。我在豆瓣的第一個好友Windrose早早就為此書寫過一篇書評,感興趣的可以去參考。 既然已經不是時髦閱讀物,現在來補寫書評,我就勉為其難的語齣驚人一迴。 很多推介這本書的人,都介紹到作者講瞭6...
評分假設一個人被蛇咬瞭,然後死瞭,你會得齣什麼結論?不懂偵探術的普通人就下一個結論,他被蛇咬死瞭。不過對於犯罪實驗室 的傢夥們來說,需要有證據說明蛇是毒蛇,死者血液裏有毒素,纔能證明他被蛇咬死瞭。也就是說,要解剖屍體纔知道真相。屍體,就是證據。會遇到多種情況,比...
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有