Samuel Phillips Huntington (April 18, 1927 – December 24, 2008) was an influential political scientist from the United States of America whose works covered multiple sub-fields of political science. He gained wider prominence through his Clash of Civilizations (1993, 1996) thesis of a post-Cold War new world order.
He was a member of Harvard's department of government from 1950 until he was denied tenure in 1959.From 1959 to 1962 he was an associate professor of government at Columbia University where he was also Deputy Director of The Institute for War and Peace Studies. Huntington was invited to return to Harvard with tenure in 1963 and remained there until his death. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1965.Huntington and Warren Demian Manshel co-founded and co-edited Foreign Policy. Huntington stayed as co-editor until 1977.
Between 1974 and 1990 more than thirty countries in southern Europe, Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe shifted from authoritarian to democratic systems of government. This global democratic revolution is probably the most important political trend in the late twentieth century. In The Third Wave, Samuel P. Huntington analyzes the causes and nature of these democratic transitions, evaluates the prospects for stability of the new democracies, and explores the possibility of more countries becoming democratic. The recent transitions, he argues, are the third major wave of democratization in the modem world. Each of the two previous waves was followed by a reverse wave in which some countries shifted back to authoritarian government. Using concrete examples, empirical evidence, and insightful analysis, Huntington provides neither a theory nor a history of the third wave, but an explanation of why and how it occurred.
Factors responsible for the democratic trend include the legitimacy dilemmas of authoritarian regimes; economic and social development; the changed role of the Catholic Church; the impact of the United States, the European Community, and the Soviet Union; and the "snowballing" phenomenon: change in one country stimulating change in others. Five key elite groups within and outside the nondemocratic regime played roles in shaping the various ways democratization occurred. Compromise was key to all democratizations, and elections and nonviolent tactics also were central. New democracies must deal with the "torturer problem" and the "praetorian problem" and attempt to develop democratic values and processes. Disillusionment with democracy, Huntington argues, is necessary to consolidating democracy. He concludes the book with an analysis of the political, economic, and cultural factors that will decide whether or not the third wave continues.
Several "Guidelines for Democratizers" offer specific, practical suggestions for initiating and carrying out reform. Huntington's emphasis on practical application makes this book a valuable tool for anyone engaged in the democratization process. At this volatile time in history, Huntington's assessment of the processes of democratization is indispensable to understanding the future of democracy in the world.
發表於2025-02-08
The Third Wave 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
塞繆爾·P·亨廷頓,美國當代最負盛名的政治學巨擘,是過去50年中世界上最具影響力的政治學傢之一,學術影響逾半個世紀。他以“文明衝突論”聞名於世,其理論在1996年甫經問世,便在全世界掀起軒然大波,飽受爭議。而《第三波——20世紀後期的民主化浪潮》則是此前他最重要的著...
評分《第三波:20世紀後期民主化浪潮》 亨廷頓的書的特色就是論證是薄弱的,也沒有鮮明的、可靠的結論,但是觀點往往很新穎,這些似是而非的結論也被證明有很高的預測作用和指導意義。亨廷頓的經驗主義者和實用主義者。最偉大的自然科學傢往往靠的是直覺,比如拉瓦西、拉馬努金、費...
評分塞繆爾·P·亨廷頓,美國當代最負盛名的政治學巨擘,是過去50年中世界上最具影響力的政治學傢之一,學術影響逾半個世紀。他以“文明衝突論”聞名於世,其理論在1996年甫經問世,便在全世界掀起軒然大波,飽受爭議。而《第三波——20世紀後期的民主化浪潮》則是此前他最重要的著...
評分第三波——20世紀後期民主化浪潮.亨廷頓著.劉軍寜譯.上海三聯書店.1998年10月第1版 前言 1. 本書目的:試圖解釋1974-1990年間這一波民主化的原因、方式及其直接後果 1 第一章 內容 一、第三波的開始 二、民主的含義 1.作為一種政體,民主一直是根據政府權威的來源,政府所服務...
圖書標籤: 政治學 政治 民主化 比較政治 民主 曆史 英文原版 文化
manual for democratization, extremely inspiring, prophetic but still incomplete
評分not theoretically insightful perhaps b/c it's meant to serve as a practical guide for government to bring about democracy. points to the role of middle-class and civic society, similar to Putnam's conclusion but lacks his precision. certain culture elements (confucianism and islam) aren't conducive to democracy, which leads to his theory developmen
評分manual for democratization, extremely inspiring, prophetic but still incomplete
評分給四星並不就說明這書很好,且看華府智囊亨廷頓如何教人玩弄權術。
評分冷戰式比較政治學的最後輝煌。先樹立西方民主典範與終極目標,再橫跨五大洲,以精巧分類學爬梳各國,通過大規模定性比較試圖總結此波民主化不同模式。不一定科學嚴謹卻足夠詳細耐心。對許多地區、尤其是儒傢和伊斯蘭提齣的問題均為日後曆史所證實,也指嚮瞭最終的文明衝突論。雖不提齣大一統理論,卻不掩飾為民主人士齣謀劃策之目的。具體而言威權政體崩潰或改變因素非常多樣,自我耗散閤法性經常發生,經濟發展、教育普及、中産集團、前代民主經驗、基督教文化、國際因素等皆為可能之結構因素或可利用之資源。重視政治過程,缺口一打開,政治傢手腕對於推動民主進程極為重要,中産階級更為關鍵因素:不必為民主運動發起者,但在關鍵時刻其態度可決定民主化成 敗走嚮。也區分瞭民主創生與民主鞏固問題。最棘手問題仍然是對舊政權集團是否清算及文武
The Third Wave 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載