本傑明·艾爾曼,1946年齣生。普林斯頓大學東亞係和曆史係教授。他的教學和研究領域包括:中國思想與文化史,1000-1900年;中華帝國晚期科技史,1600-1930年;中日文化學術交流史,1600-1850年。主要著作有:《從理學到樸學:中華帝國晚期思想與社會變化麵麵觀》、《經學、政治和宗族:中華帝國晚期常州今文學派研究》、《晚期中華帝國科舉文化史》、《以他們自己的方式:科學在中國,1550-1900》等。
From Philosophy to Philology is an indispensable work on the intellectual life of China’s literati in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. While there was not a scientific revolution in China, there was an intellectual one. The shock of the Manchu conquest and the collapse of the Ming dynasty in 1644 led to a rejection of the moral self-cultivation that dominated intellectual life under the Ming. China’s scholars, particularly in the Yangzi River Basin, sought to restore China’s greatness by recapturing the wisdom of the ancients from the Warring States period (403–221 B.C.) and the Former Han dynasty (202 B.C.–9 A.D.), much as Renaissance Europe rediscovered the Greeks and Romans. But in China scholars faced the daunting task of determining which of many editions of the Classics were the true originals and which were forged additions of later centuries.
The ensuing search for authentic texts led to the founding of academies and libraries, the compiling of bibliographies, the rise of printing of editions of the Classics and Histories and commentaries on their components, the study of ancient inscriptions, and a two-hundred-year effort to discover and discard forged texts. In the process rigorous standards of scholarly training were adopted, and scholarship became a full-time profession distinct from gentry farmers or imperial officials.
發表於2024-11-14
From Philosophy to Philology 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
六月第一周,讀艾爾曼《從理學到樸學》與《經學、政治和宗族》二書,寫得都非常好看。以知識社會學為方法來寫的書,其實都很豐富有趣。由於兩書名氣甚大,都知道這是知識社會學治漢學的經典,所以我這裏隻談一些細微的感受。 《從理學到樸學》,最精彩的是三四五章。研究瞭考...
評分2nd edition, 2001)---a preliminary note The keyword in the title “From Philosophy to Philology: intellectual and social aspects of change in late imperial China” is “change”. As the preface summarizes, “during the Qing dynasty a unified academic c...
評分按:從網上搜到的幾篇書評大都是從學理與方法的角度切入的,大概跟此書與眾思想史不同的寫作體例不無關係。不過我還是希望看到更實質的探討,比如說如何理解艾爾曼所謂的乾嘉考據學共同體這一問題,在沒有完備的學術機構的前現代社會,用現代學術共同體的眼光來審視其組織形態...
評分這算是一本如雷貫耳的西方漢學著作瞭。它在討論一個自時代的水平麵上橫切齣來的用以縱觀思想與社會變化諸麵相的課題的時候,極鮮明地稟賦瞭漢學應有的全部優點和不足,用書中所討論的漢學和宋學做個不恰當的比喻,可以說這本書在義理之學上占據瞭一個製高點的位置(比如運用瞭...
評分圖書標籤: 思想史 蘇芒 社會學 曆史 中國研究 dissertation
厚得要命 一個學期跨度的project最後兩周開始讀一天看百頁 也是作死 人啊名詞啊對不上中文還是挺痛苦的(
評分厚得要命 一個學期跨度的project最後兩周開始讀一天看百頁 也是作死 人啊名詞啊對不上中文還是挺痛苦的(
評分厚得要命 一個學期跨度的project最後兩周開始讀一天看百頁 也是作死 人啊名詞啊對不上中文還是挺痛苦的(
評分厚得要命 一個學期跨度的project最後兩周開始讀一天看百頁 也是作死 人啊名詞啊對不上中文還是挺痛苦的(
評分厚得要命 一個學期跨度的project最後兩周開始讀一天看百頁 也是作死 人啊名詞啊對不上中文還是挺痛苦的(
From Philosophy to Philology 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載