Mark Salber Phillips is professor of history at Carleton University, Ottawa. He is the author of Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Thought in Britain, 1740-1820, as well as studies on the Italian Renaissance and on the concept of tradition.
Conceptions of distance are foundational to historical thought, but Mark Salber Phillips gives the idea new subtlety and meaning. He argues that distance is a matter not just of time and space but also of form, affect, ideology, and understanding. In this exceptionally wide-ranging study, Phillips examines Renaissance, Enlightenment, and contemporary histories, as well as a broad spectrum of historical genres—including local history, literary history, counter-factual fiction, history painting, and museology.
關於距離的概念是曆史思想的基礎,但是Mark Salber Phillips給瞭這個概念新的微妙和意義。他認為,距離不僅是時間和空間的問題,也是形式、情感、意識形態和理解的問題。在這個特彆廣泛的研究,菲利普斯審查文藝復興,啓濛運動,當代曆史,以及廣泛的曆史類型-包括地方曆史,文...
評分關於距離的概念是曆史思想的基礎,但是Mark Salber Phillips給瞭這個概念新的微妙和意義。他認為,距離不僅是時間和空間的問題,也是形式、情感、意識形態和理解的問題。在這個特彆廣泛的研究,菲利普斯審查文藝復興,啓濛運動,當代曆史,以及廣泛的曆史類型-包括地方曆史,文...
評分關於距離的概念是曆史思想的基礎,但是Mark Salber Phillips給瞭這個概念新的微妙和意義。他認為,距離不僅是時間和空間的問題,也是形式、情感、意識形態和理解的問題。在這個特彆廣泛的研究,菲利普斯審查文藝復興,啓濛運動,當代曆史,以及廣泛的曆史類型-包括地方曆史,文...
評分關於距離的概念是曆史思想的基礎,但是Mark Salber Phillips給瞭這個概念新的微妙和意義。他認為,距離不僅是時間和空間的問題,也是形式、情感、意識形態和理解的問題。在這個特彆廣泛的研究,菲利普斯審查文藝復興,啓濛運動,當代曆史,以及廣泛的曆史類型-包括地方曆史,文...
評分關於距離的概念是曆史思想的基礎,但是Mark Salber Phillips給瞭這個概念新的微妙和意義。他認為,距離不僅是時間和空間的問題,也是形式、情感、意識形態和理解的問題。在這個特彆廣泛的研究,菲利普斯審查文藝復興,啓濛運動,當代曆史,以及廣泛的曆史類型-包括地方曆史,文...
worth coming back to for individual cases (Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Britain, post-1968 historiography), but too technical to be useful for general reading
评分worth coming back to for individual cases (Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Britain, post-1968 historiography), but too technical to be useful for general reading
评分worth coming back to for individual cases (Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Britain, post-1968 historiography), but too technical to be useful for general reading
评分worth coming back to for individual cases (Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Britain, post-1968 historiography), but too technical to be useful for general reading
评分worth coming back to for individual cases (Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Britain, post-1968 historiography), but too technical to be useful for general reading
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有