Adam Przeworski (born 1940) is a Polish-American professor of Political Science. One of the main important theorists and analysers of democratic societies, theory of democracy and political economy, he is currently a full professor at the Wilf Family Department of Politics of New York University.
Born in 1940 in Warsaw, Poland, Przeworski graduated from Warsaw University in 1961. Soon afterwards, he moved to the United States, where he received his Ph.D. at Northwestern University in 1966. He taught at the University of Chicago, where he was awarded with the title of Martin A. Ryerson Distinguished Service Professor. He also held visiting appointments in India, Chile, Great Britain, France (among others, at the American University of Paris), Germany, Spain (Juan March Institute), and Switzerland. Since 1991, Przeworski has been a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2001 shared the Woodrow Wilson Prize for the book Democracy and Development. To date, he has authored 13 books and numerous articles.
Przeworski was a member of the September Group of Analytical Marxists, but left the group in the early 1990s.
The quest for freedom from hunger and repression has triggered in recent years a dramatic, worldwide reform of political and economic systems. Never have so many people enjoyed, or at least experimented with democratic institutions. However, many strategies for economic development in Eastern Europe and Latin America have failed with the result that entire economic systems on both continents are being transformed. This major book analyzes recent transitions to democracy and market-oriented economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Drawing in a quite distinctive way on models derived from political philosophy, economics, and game theory, Professor Przeworski also considers specific data on individual countries. Among the questions raised by the book are: What should we expect from these experiments in democracy and market economy? What new economic systems will emerge? Will these transitions result in new democracies or old dictatorships?
發表於2024-11-24
Democracy and the Market 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
轉型的民主與理想 ——讀《民主與市場》 文/程明 政治民主化和經濟自由化是20世紀兩股世界潮流。 1915年孫中山先生在廣東省海寜視察時說:“世界潮流、浩浩蕩蕩、順之者昌、逆之者亡。”1840年鴉片戰爭後,在“衝擊—迴應”模式下,迫使中國逐步走嚮近代化。從洋務運...
評分 評分 評分 評分轉型的民主與理想 ——讀《民主與市場》 文/程明 政治民主化和經濟自由化是20世紀兩股世界潮流。 1915年孫中山先生在廣東省海寜視察時說:“世界潮流、浩浩蕩蕩、順之者昌、逆之者亡。”1840年鴉片戰爭後,在“衝擊—迴應”模式下,迫使中國逐步走嚮近代化。從洋務運...
圖書標籤: 政治經濟學 政治學 比較政治經濟學 Przeworski 民主轉型 politics 民主 英文原版
準備資格考試的又一大收獲
評分此書之所以在政治經濟學的研究裏享有非常高的聲譽,就在於作者通過此書的研究發展瞭經由有競爭性選舉所産生的政權交替是民主政治的要義的理論。進而,在此後的很長一段時間裏,許多學者都依據這一點作為民主政治的操作性定義和最基本的解釋變量。不過,相較於理論經濟學,政治學的學生很容易發現,假若我們將民主理論類似於市場理論之於經濟學,那麼在政治學的討論裏,民主理論不僅目前仍舊充滿瞭規範性,價值論的研究文獻,公理化的從微觀到宏觀一以貫之的理論框架仍舊是非常之少的。倘若以這樣薄弱的民主理論去推論民主之於經濟運營的影響。可以說隨之而來的經驗研究,無論有多少,對於增進我們之於民主政治的理解,恐怕沒有很大的助益。尤其是現在的學生們都過度熱衷可操作化的定義和數據搜集與統計模型的學習的情況下,理論建設的忽視是讓人不安的
評分沿襲瞭Schumpeter關於民主政治的過程性定義(有彆於諸如Putnam的實質性定義),將其界定為“a system in which parties lose elections",並以此展開全書。分析簡潔、冷靜,從政治經濟模型入手進行推演,再以拉美和東歐的實例論證。變量雖然單一,對事實的解釋顯得遊刃有餘,但同時也承認改革結果的偶然性。第四章對政治改革和經濟改革關係的闡述很有啓發,但我猜作者當年大概沒料到中國的成功。第二章適閤開腦洞,按Perry的說法,大概需要Pekinology輔助。
評分準備資格考試的又一大收獲
評分沿襲瞭Schumpeter關於民主政治的過程性定義(有彆於諸如Putnam的實質性定義),將其界定為“a system in which parties lose elections",並以此展開全書。分析簡潔、冷靜,從政治經濟模型入手進行推演,再以拉美和東歐的實例論證。變量雖然單一,對事實的解釋顯得遊刃有餘,但同時也承認改革結果的偶然性。第四章對政治改革和經濟改革關係的闡述很有啓發,但我猜作者當年大概沒料到中國的成功。第二章適閤開腦洞,按Perry的說法,大概需要Pekinology輔助。
Democracy and the Market 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載