Tonio Andrade is professor of history at Emory University and the author of Lost Colony: The Untold Story of China’s First Great Victory over the West (Princeton) and How Taiwan Became Chinese.
The Chinese invented gunpowder and began exploring its military uses as early as the 900s, four centuries before the technology passed to the West. But by the early 1800s, China had fallen so far behind the West in gunpowder warfare that it was easily defeated by Britain in the Opium War of 1839–42. What happened? In The Gunpowder Age, Tonio Andrade offers a compelling new answer, opening a fresh perspective on a key question of world history: why did the countries of western Europe surge to global importance starting in the 1500s while China slipped behind?
Historians have long argued that gunpowder weapons helped Europeans establish global hegemony. Yet the inhabitants of what is today China not only invented guns and bombs but also, as Andrade shows, continued to innovate in gunpowder technology through the early 1700s—much longer than previously thought. Why, then, did China become so vulnerable? Andrade argues that one significant reason is that it was out of practice fighting wars, having enjoyed nearly a century of relative peace, since 1760. Indeed, he demonstrates that China—like Europe—was a powerful military innovator, particularly during times of great warfare, such as the violent century starting after the Opium War, when the Chinese once again quickly modernized their forces. Today, China is simply returning to its old position as one of the world’s great military powers.
By showing that China’s military dynamism was deeper, longer lasting, and more quickly recovered than previously understood, The Gunpowder Age challenges long-standing explanations of the so-called Great Divergence between the West and Asia.
發表於2024-12-22
The Gunpowder Age 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
曆史是個**,勝利者想怎麼錶述就錶述。 曆史真的不是一個一句話,一個觀點,一本書就能夠說清楚的。每個生活在當時的人,都是那段曆史的締造者,而作為一個個後來的人,大傢怎麼看待以前曆史的,這是一個有意思的話題也是一個需要正視的問題。 說瞭這麼多,現在切入正題——就...
評分作者對中西方典籍很是熟悉,引用史料可謂詳實,本書講述瞭從火藥的誕生到黑火藥最後一次大規模運用於戰爭的發展曆程。從火槍火炮在東方的首先運用再到東西方的並駕齊驅階段,一直講到東西分流,19世紀西方軍事技術狂突猛進,把東亞遠遠的甩在身後,百年近代屈辱史講的好,落後...
評分中國人發明瞭火藥,但隻是用來慶祝新年和節日,西方人受到啓發,發明瞭火炮,進而展開對異域的殖民擴張——類似的看法或陳見,不僅見諸以魯迅代錶的“新文化運動”主將筆下,也在不少國內外學者當中蔓延,以至於成為瞭某種集體無意識;暫且不論前者與後者的不同,特彆是其産生...
圖書標籤: 軍事 曆史 中國 歐洲 軍事史 清史 海外中國研究 近世史
從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
評分從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
評分或許初始期望太高,讀完發現提齣問題和試探多於解釋,更適閤做教科書。軍事大分流的說法很有趣,相對平行的軍事技術和作戰模式比較,尤其是幾次歐洲與亞洲勢力交鋒也頗有趣,分流在18世紀中葉(所謂盛清和平期)也恰與彭慕蘭說法對證。不過兩個主要論點——無多國/多政體體係則無戰爭、無戰爭則無威脅、無威脅則無進步(一係列戰爭與國傢形成文獻),盛清一統安靖導緻軍事革新需求消失;科學/技術與科技群體的獨立發展對軍事革新的促進作用(李約瑟等?)——似已經被反復論述過,並無什麼齣色之處。歐洲船隻更先進更抗風浪、歐洲中世紀堡壘城牆較薄但允許火藥武器開火還擊,確乎為重要優勢,且也在無形中促進火藥武器發展和軍隊遠徵與後勤編組進步,然歐陸多國戰爭恰使其非鐵闆一塊,前者僅為少數海權國擁有、後者則並未在遠徵中體現。
評分從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
評分從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
The Gunpowder Age 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載