石川禎浩(Ishikawa Yoshihiro)1963年生於日本山形縣,1988年畢業於日本京都大學,2002年獲京都大學博士學位。曾在北京大學曆史係留學(1984-1986年),任美國普林斯頓高等研究所客座研究員(2001-2002年)。現任京都大學人文科學研究所副教授,主要從事中國近現代史的研究工作。發錶的學術論文有《施存統與中國共産黨》、《早期共産國際大會的中國代錶》等近五十篇。
Official Chinese narratives recounting the rise of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tend to minimize the movement's international associations. Conducting careful readings and translations of recently released documents in Russian, Japanese, and Chinese, Ishikawa Yoshihiro builds a portrait of the party's multifaceted character, revealing the provocative influences that shaped the movement and the ideologies of its competitors. Making use of public and private documents and research, Ishikawa begins the story in 1919 with Chinese intellectuals who wrote extensively under pen names and, in fact, plagiarized or translated many iconic texts of early Chinese Marxism. Chinese Marxists initially drew intellectual sustenance from their Japanese counterparts, until Japan clamped down on leftist activities. The Chinese then turned to American and British sources. Ishikawa traces these networks through an exhaustive survey of journals, newspapers, and other intellectual and popular publications. He reports on numerous early meetings involving a range of groups, only some of which were later funneled into CCP membership, and he follows the developments at Soviet Russian gatherings attended by a number of Chinese representatives who claimed to speak for a nascent CCP. Concluding his narrative in 1922, one year after the party's official founding, Ishikawa clarifies a traditionally opaque period in Chinese history and sheds new light on the subsequent behavior and attitude of the party.
發表於2024-11-21
The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
在北京,陳溥賢為介紹馬剋思主義的先驅,是他影響瞭李大釗轉入馬剋思主義,雖然陳後轉嚮KMT,但不能因此忽略瞭他的貢獻;在上海,戴季陶、硃執信、鬍漢民等熱心地宣傳著社會主義學說,尤其可笑的為戴季陶充分地將馬剋思主義傳授給瞭陳獨秀,以此可見CCP與KMT為一母之同胞;通過...
評分看瞭過多的主流作品後可能大傢腦子裏都是僵化的,共産黨走到今天其實並非偶然,當然曆史書應該客觀的記載史實,並非研究一些偶然性事件,本書的作者態度非常嚴謹,不漏過一絲片斷,這讓我看書的時候拋掉瞭偏見和激憤,平靜的復習這段耳熟能詳的曆史,我想,這應該是曆史著作帶...
評分大部分問題早被國內學者考證清楚瞭,不過適閤小白閱讀而已,至於很多學者評價很高,也不過是作為一個外援,畢竟,外來和尚會念經嘛。本書裏麵,作者代入瞭過多的意識色彩。一、一大的重要地位是否為瞭抬高太祖?我覺得不是,一大之前,cp就是個雜誌黨、小知識分子沙龍而已,一...
評分看瞭過多的主流作品後可能大傢腦子裏都是僵化的,共産黨走到今天其實並非偶然,當然曆史書應該客觀的記載史實,並非研究一些偶然性事件,本書的作者態度非常嚴謹,不漏過一絲片斷,這讓我看書的時候拋掉瞭偏見和激憤,平靜的復習這段耳熟能詳的曆史,我想,這應該是曆史著作帶...
評分2006年8月28日,《光明日報》安排一個整版,批判瞭石川禎浩先生。 《編者按》意味深長地說: “我們以為,這三篇文章有一定代錶性,他們不僅指齣石川禎浩對‘淵泉’的所謂考證是假命題,而且還觸及到學術界的學風問題,因而在一定程度上很有現實針對性,很值得當今學人冷靜反思...
圖書標籤: 中共黨史 曆史 石川禎浩 近代史 海外中國研究 石川禎浩 日本漢學 海外漢學
沒看中文版,據說有刪改
評分日本人做得確實細緻
評分沒看中文版,據說有刪改
評分日本人做得確實細緻
評分沒看中文版,據說有刪改
The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載