石川禎浩(Ishikawa Yoshihiro)1963年生於日本山形縣,1988年畢業於日本京都大學,2002年獲京都大學博士學位。曾在北京大學曆史係留學(1984-1986年),任美國普林斯頓高等研究所客座研究員(2001-2002年)。現任京都大學人文科學研究所副教授,主要從事中國近現代史的研究工作。發錶的學術論文有《施存統與中國共産黨》、《早期共産國際大會的中國代錶》等近五十篇。
Official Chinese narratives recounting the rise of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tend to minimize the movement's international associations. Conducting careful readings and translations of recently released documents in Russian, Japanese, and Chinese, Ishikawa Yoshihiro builds a portrait of the party's multifaceted character, revealing the provocative influences that shaped the movement and the ideologies of its competitors. Making use of public and private documents and research, Ishikawa begins the story in 1919 with Chinese intellectuals who wrote extensively under pen names and, in fact, plagiarized or translated many iconic texts of early Chinese Marxism. Chinese Marxists initially drew intellectual sustenance from their Japanese counterparts, until Japan clamped down on leftist activities. The Chinese then turned to American and British sources. Ishikawa traces these networks through an exhaustive survey of journals, newspapers, and other intellectual and popular publications. He reports on numerous early meetings involving a range of groups, only some of which were later funneled into CCP membership, and he follows the developments at Soviet Russian gatherings attended by a number of Chinese representatives who claimed to speak for a nascent CCP. Concluding his narrative in 1922, one year after the party's official founding, Ishikawa clarifies a traditionally opaque period in Chinese history and sheds new light on the subsequent behavior and attitude of the party.
發表於2024-05-13
The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
此書的考據功夫足夠金衝及們學幾輩子,而知識分子的良心更是不可多得。不知為何楊奎鬆,王奇生從來沒有關懷過這個發生的瞬間,裏麵撲朔迷離,很多細節至今尚未揭曉,比如陳獨秀李大釗為何沒有親自參加,以往考據提供理由非常牽強,難道他們根本不重視這件事嗎?有待研究。 同時...
評分鄭老師告訴我,最近有人給他寄瞭一份資料,論述瞭中國共産黨成立的時間,應是1920年11月《中國共産黨宣言》發錶之日。其觀點的來源是日本學者石川禎浩寫的《中國共産黨成立史》。此書作者認為中國共産黨成立的“標誌就是 1920年11月製定的《中國共産黨宣言》, 以及...
評分 評分此書的考據功夫足夠金衝及們學幾輩子,而知識分子的良心更是不可多得。不知為何楊奎鬆,王奇生從來沒有關懷過這個發生的瞬間,裏麵撲朔迷離,很多細節至今尚未揭曉,比如陳獨秀李大釗為何沒有親自參加,以往考據提供理由非常牽強,難道他們根本不重視這件事嗎?有待研究。 同時...
評分2006年8月28日,《光明日報》安排一個整版,批判瞭石川禎浩先生。 《編者按》意味深長地說: “我們以為,這三篇文章有一定代錶性,他們不僅指齣石川禎浩對‘淵泉’的所謂考證是假命題,而且還觸及到學術界的學風問題,因而在一定程度上很有現實針對性,很值得當今學人冷靜反思...
圖書標籤: 中共黨史 曆史 石川禎浩 近代史 海外中國研究 石川禎浩 日本漢學 海外漢學
日本人做得確實細緻
評分沒看中文版,據說有刪改
評分detailed and convincing
評分detailed and convincing
評分沒看中文版,據說有刪改
The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載