史蒂文·蘭茲伯格為芝加哥大學經濟學博士,現任羅徹斯特大學經濟學教授。蘭茲伯格在《Slate》網絡雜誌撰寫的“每日經濟學”專欄深受歡迎,他也應邀在《財富》、《福布斯》、《紐約時報》、《華盛頓郵報》、《華爾街日報》等刊物發錶文章。著有《一個經濟學傢給女兒的忠告》、《價格理論與應用》,以及暢銷書《生命中的經濟遊戲》。
Steven Landsburg's writings are living proof that economics need not be "the dismal science." Readers of The Armchair Economist and his columns in Slate magazine know that he can make economics not only fun but fascinating, as he searches for the reasons behind the odd facts we face in our daily lives. In More Sex Is Safer Sex, he brings his witty and razor-sharp analysis to the many ways that our individually rational decisions can combine into some truly weird collective results -- and he proposes hilarious and serious ways to fix just about everything.
When you stand up at the ballpark in order to see better, you make a rational decision. When everyone else does it too, the results, of course, are lousy. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of individual sanity and collective madness. Did you know that some people may actually increase the spread of sexually transmitted diseases when they avoid casual sex? Do you know why tall people earn more money than shorter competitors? (Hint: it isn't just unfair, unconscious prejudice.) Do you know why it makes no sense for you to give charitable donations to more than one organization?
Landsburg's solutions to the many ways that modern life is unfair or inefficient are both jaw-dropping and maddeningly defensible. We should encourage people to cut in line at water fountains on hot days. We should let firefighters keep any property they rescue from burning houses. We should encourage more people to act like Scrooge, because misers are just as generous as philanthropists.
Best of all are Landsburg's commonsense solutions to the political problems that plague our democracy. We should charge penalties to jurors if they convict a felon who is later exonerated. We should let everyone vote in two congressional districts: their own, and any other one of their choice. While we're at it, we should redraw the districts according to the alphabetical lists of all voters, rather than by geography. We should pay FDA commissioners with shares of pharmaceutical company stocks, and pay our president with a diversified portfolio of real estate from across the country.
Why do parents of sons stay married more often than parents who have only daughters? Why does early motherhood not only correlate with lower income, but actually cause it? Why do we execute murderers but not the authors of vicious computer viruses? The lesson of this fascinating, fun, and endlessly provocative book is twofold: many apparently very odd behaviors have logical explanations, and many apparently logical behaviors make no sense whatsoever.
我並不是說自己是封建禮教的衛道士,而是實在是邏輯有問題 如果一個人原先性保守,潔身自好,突然去外麵亂搞瞭,確實是擴充瞭這個群體的基數,也使得一部分原先可能和得艾滋病的人亂搞的人和這個人搞瞭,使得這一部分人不患艾滋,但這首先就有一個邏輯漏洞,就是 那個得艾滋的...
評分看著玩的 作者基於自己的經曆和學識 經過自己的推理齣發 得齣瞭很多結論 很多與世界上的問題沒有太大的關聯度 也解決不瞭什麼問題 看著玩多開打一點窗戶 任何人隻要自己琢磨事兒 根據自己的邏輯推理得齣的結論 無論效果如何 都是好樣的
評分後現代還存在幸生活保守的人,這大概是以前曆次思想解放後殘餘下來的頑固分子,這本書大概是為瞭徹底將他們鏟除,理由是:幸開放可以延緩艾滋病的傳播! 作者很天真的認為,一個幸保守的人多與其他人交媾幾次,那麼至少帶來2方麵的好處:1. 被交媾的人感染艾滋病的機會降低;2...
評分沒看完,也不覺得需要看完。光看前三個例子就覺得睏惑很多,很難說服人。 第一:性越多越安全。 作者的想法是性疾病之所以傳染迅速,是因為一群“淫蕩”的,“ 不負責任”的(至少在他看來是這樣的,得瞭艾滋病還去做愛的風流鬼們)人由於在一個小圈子裏進行性交,所以在這個圈...
評分值得一看,不過也彆太當真。 這是一本通俗經濟學的讀本,對很多傳統或者說保守的觀點,從經濟學的角度提齣瞭挑戰,促人深思。可以被我列入讀後增長智慧的書。 但也僅此而已,韆萬不要把它當成一本嚴肅的經濟學著作。
讀懂不到百分之五十。
评分嗬嗬,這本書挺有意思的!剛看書名以為是一本性學書籍,其實是一本純經濟學讀物。英文原版被我從孔夫子舊書店買到瞭,不貴。再買一個中文譯本,對照著看看,挺有意思!
评分there is a major flaw of the theory: more sex, there will be more infection of HIV. Thus, the ratio of infection is indeed reduced by more sex, however, the result is still opposite of good.
评分感覺一般!講道理很勉強!
评分讀懂不到百分之五十。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有