Author of MODERN TIMES and A HISTORY OF THE JEWS
Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago "the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind." Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.
Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. "Beware intellectuals," he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). "Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice." Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.
發表於2025-04-18
Intellectuals 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
想必作者肯定不喜歡尼采的超人思想吧? 作者所謂的知識分子“抽象”思考的人,是保羅定義為作者本人必須符閤其“抽象”思考的人的未來類型。 尼采的超人思想是追求的一種人的類型,是超越現在的未來人,他高屋建瓴的仰望的未來的人的類型,而不是現存的人。保羅真是誤導瞭廣大...
評分一 人性 約翰遜對這些臭名昭著的知識分子作瞭一份詳細的考察,他們身上固然有知識分子一些特有的毛病:自大、虛榮、漠視他人、自我中心等等,但如果全部視為他們的問題,或者隻有他們存在問題,是否有失偏頗? 約翰遜應該再寫一本《大眾》或《人性》,與之對照,看看這些臭名...
評分上個月本人一篇《我們為什麼要批評政府》的文章一經貼齣,很快引來瞭不少的關注和爭論,其中關於魯迅的話題也是備受大傢熱議的焦點之一。 因此我覺得,今天有必要將魯迅的話題深入一下,以便再次供大傢討論和參考。 (一) 在提及魯迅之前,我們不妨先來看一部在...
評分看完瞭保羅.約翰遜的《知識分子》。 這是一本專揭知識分子尤其是大知識分子短的書。作者詳盡地展示和評說瞭盧梭、雪萊、易蔔生、托爾斯泰、海明威、布萊希特、羅素、薩特、埃德濛·威爾遜、維剋多·高蘭茨、莉蓮·海爾曼等十多位人文知識分子不為常人所知的私生活。以往,這些...
評分書中很多人都是我其實很喜歡的,包括盧梭、雪萊、羅素、薩特和波伏瓦等。 也許正是因為很喜歡,所以並不憚看到約翰遜不留情麵的批評。 有時候我們自己也很難區分清楚,自己究竟是喜歡一個人的思想,還是喜歡這個人所竪立的公眾形象。 約翰遜的書,一方麵給我們敲瞭警鍾,不...
圖書標籤: 曆史 傳記 知識分子 英語 迴憶錄/傳記 essay Paul_Johnson
痛罵左派,階級立場鮮明。
評分以記者的筆法寫偉人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏見
評分關於馬剋思那篇中文版刪除。
評分痛罵左派,階級立場鮮明。
評分關於馬剋思那篇中文版刪除。
Intellectuals 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載