发表于2024-11-17
Hart's Postscript 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 法理 法哲学 Hart's
Published posthumously, the second edition of The Concept of Law contains one important addition to the first edition, a substantial Postscript, in which Hart reflects upon some of the central concerns that have been expressed about the book since its publication in 1961. The Postscript is especially noteworthy because it contains Hart's only sustained response to the objections pressed by his foremost critic, Ronald Dworkin, who succeeded him to the Chair of Jurisprudence at Oxford. The Postscript focuses on a range of issues covering both Hart's substantive view and his methodological commitments. In particular, Hart endorses Inclusive Legal Positivism, asserts that his is a methodology of descriptive jurisprudence which he contrasts with Dworkin's normative jurisprudence or interpretivism, while denying that his theory of law has a semantic underpinning. The essays in this collection address each of these issues in a sustained way. The book contains discussions of Hart's semantic commitments, his rejection of a normative jurisprudence as well as the extent to which he can embrace Inclusive Legal Positivism in a way that is consistent with his other stated positions. The book's contributors include the leading advocates of alternative schools of Positivist jurisprudence, important contributors to the methodogical disputes in jurisprudence and noted experts on the relationship of philosophy of language to jurisprudence. Among the contributors of note are: Joseph Raz, Jules L. Coleman, Stephen Perry, Brian Leiter, Scott Shapiro and Andrei Marmor.
当今法理学大咖们对哈德论战的解读,相当精彩!先是哈特实证主义理论的语义学(semantic)概念分析(1,2,3篇),然后进入为吸收德翁批评而演化的包容性及排他性(inclusive vs. exclusive)实证主义的论题兼容性讨论(4,5篇),哈特倡导的描述性法理学(descriptive jurisprudence)的方法论是否可能及其背后(能否)省略的规范性问题(6,7,9篇)。对梳理问题-流派的当代学术发展脉络甚有裨益,也顺便见识法理前沿学者的文笔/风格/(部分)视野格局。觉得Endicott,科尔曼,夏皮罗,Perry的文笔最简洁流畅;第11篇讨论哈德二人各自理论的背后的政治关切,觉得有点moot,第8篇挑战拉兹的“合法权威”truism讨论有点只见树木不见森林,第12篇好随便
评分看了两篇,还有五篇在其他文集/专著中看过
评分当今法理学大咖们对哈德论战的解读,相当精彩!先是哈特实证主义理论的语义学(semantic)概念分析(1,2,3篇),然后进入为吸收德翁批评而演化的包容性及排他性(inclusive vs. exclusive)实证主义的论题兼容性讨论(4,5篇),哈特倡导的描述性法理学(descriptive jurisprudence)的方法论是否可能及其背后(能否)省略的规范性问题(6,7,9篇)。对梳理问题-流派的当代学术发展脉络甚有裨益,也顺便见识法理前沿学者的文笔/风格/(部分)视野格局。觉得Endicott,科尔曼,夏皮罗,Perry的文笔最简洁流畅;第11篇讨论哈德二人各自理论的背后的政治关切,觉得有点moot,第8篇挑战拉兹的“合法权威”truism讨论有点只见树木不见森林,第12篇好随便
评分当今法理学大咖们对哈德论战的解读,相当精彩!先是哈特实证主义理论的语义学(semantic)概念分析(1,2,3篇),然后进入为吸收德翁批评而演化的包容性及排他性(inclusive vs. exclusive)实证主义的论题兼容性讨论(4,5篇),哈特倡导的描述性法理学(descriptive jurisprudence)的方法论是否可能及其背后(能否)省略的规范性问题(6,7,9篇)。对梳理问题-流派的当代学术发展脉络甚有裨益,也顺便见识法理前沿学者的文笔/风格/(部分)视野格局。觉得Endicott,科尔曼,夏皮罗,Perry的文笔最简洁流畅;第11篇讨论哈德二人各自理论的背后的政治关切,觉得有点moot,第8篇挑战拉兹的“合法权威”truism讨论有点只见树木不见森林,第12篇好随便
评分看了两篇,还有五篇在其他文集/专著中看过
Hart's Postscript 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书