Peter Evans is best known for his work on the comparative political economy of national development, exemplified by his 1995 book Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation and a recent series of articles on the “21st Century Developmental State.” For the past several years he has been researching the ways in which social movements can mobilize transnationally to build a “counter-hegemonic globalization.” Among these movements, the global labor movement is a key actor. See his 2008 article, “Is an Alternative Globalization Possible?” and his 2010 article “Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize?”
Theda Skocpol (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is professor emeritus of sociology and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor emeritus of International Studies. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.His books include Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research (Princeton University Press, forthcoming in 2009); Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambribge University Press, 2003, co-edited with J. Mahoney); Participation and Democracy East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations (M. E. Sharpe, 1998, co-edited with M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock); States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton University Press, 1996, co-edited with Th. Skocpol); Capitalist Development and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1992, co-authored with E. H. Stephens and J. D. Stephen); Power and the Division of Labour (Stanford University Press, 1986); and Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985, co-edited with P.B. Evans and Th. Skocpol).
发表于2024-12-22
Bringing the State Back In 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
图书标签: 政治学 state 社会学 比较政治 politics 国家主义范式 政治 政治社会学
Product Description
Until recently, dominant theoretical paradigms in the comparative social sciences did not highlight states as organizational structures or as potentially autonomous actors. Indeed, the term 'state' was rarely used. Current work, however, increasingly views the state as an agent which, although influenced by the society that surrounds it, also shapes social and political processes. The contributors to this volume, which includes some of the best recent interdisciplinary scholarship on states in relation to social structures, make use of theoretically engaged comparative and historical investigations to provide improved conceptualizations of states and how they operate. Each of the book's major parts presents a related set of analytical issues about modern states, which are explored in the context of a wide range of times and places, both contemporary and historical, and in developing and advanced-industrial nations. The first part examines state strategies in newly developing countries. The second part analyzes war making and state making in early modern Europe, and discusses states in relation to the post-World War II international economy. The third part pursues new insights into how states influence political cleavages and collective action. In the final chapter, the editors bring together the questions raised by the contributors and suggest tentative conclusions that emerge from an overview of all the articles. As a programmatic work that proposes new directions for the analysis of modern states, the volume will appeal to a wide range of teachers and students of political science, political economy, sociology, history, and anthropology.
70s: social science's interest in the state; against neo-Marxism and pluralist (group) theory; state's initiatives and its effects over society
评分#Soc140 Chap5 Tilly
评分#Soc140 Chap5 Tilly
评分关于经济的部分就以后再看吧不着急。Tilly那篇不用说。第三部分的三篇都很有意思,尤其Stepan关于BA政体和civil society的相互作用的论述很有启发,state为了维系legitimacy需要both offensive and defensive projects,前者失灵的时候就靠制造恐慌来维持国民的依赖;而两个都失灵之后的某个时刻军政府的军队部分和政府部分产生分裂政权就崩盘了。然而把state与society完全割裂开的分析方法在后来被很多人批判过,因为交互太多无法找到一个确切的界限。用Stepan的例子来说,巴西的商界受到state影响多少受到civil society影响又有多少,智利的state enterprise属于state还是society呢?
评分Tilly的研究提供了非常宽广的视野,不过在合法性问题和暴力如何实现组织化方面,他的研究仍然不令人满意。最后一章对于当代政治学研究是一个绝好的提醒。
Bringing the State Back In 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书