Legal Orientalism pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

簡體網頁||繁體網頁

☆☆☆☆☆

Teemu Ruskola is Professor of Law at Emory University.

出版者:Harvard University Press

作者:Teemu Ruskola

出品人:

頁數:352

译者:

出版時間:2013-6-3

價格:USD 42.00

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9780674073067

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

法律史
法學
海外中國研究
東方主義
法律史與法律文化
中國
英文原版
清代

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到本本書屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Since the Cold War ended, China has become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the United States has positioned itself as the world's chief exporter of the rule of law. How did lawlessness become an axiom about Chineseness rather than a fact needing to be verified empirically, and how did the United States assume the mantle of law's universal appeal? In a series of wide-ranging inquiries, Teemu Ruskola investigates the history of "legal Orientalism": a set of globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it. For example, why is China said not to have a history of corporate law, as a way of explaining its "failure" to develop capitalism on its own? Ruskola shows how a European tradition of philosophical prejudices about Chinese law developed into a distinctively American ideology of empire, influential to this day. The first Sino-U.S. treaty in 1844 authorized the extraterritorial application of American law in a putatively lawless China. A kind of legal imperialism, this practice long predated U.S. territorial colonialism after the Spanish-American War in 1898, and found its fullest expression in an American district court's jurisdiction over the "District of China. " With urgent contemporary implications, legal Orientalism lives on in the enduring damage wrought on the U.S. Constitution by late nineteenth-century anti-Chinese immigration laws, and in the self-Orientalizing reforms of Chinese law today. In the global politics of trade and human rights, legal Orientalism continues to shape modern subjectivities, institutions, and geopolitics in powerful and unacknowledged ways.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

How the West denied China's law Legal Orientalism: China, the US and Modern Law by Teemu Ruskola By Dinesh Sharma http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-270913.html 簡單地說，所謂東方沒有法律的說法是一種文化沙文和文化種族歧視。由於近代化對中國的影響...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

愛德華•薩義德在《東方主義》的開篇中談到，東方主義是 “文化和政治的現實”，並且是一種被建構的現實，將西方人的想象投射到關於東方的話語之中。既然是話語，就有著一張普羅透斯的臉，文學的、曆史的或是政治的，當然也可能是以法律的形式存在。美國埃默裏大學的絡德睦(T...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

[Copyright 2016 mozartera. Please indicate the source when reposting.] "Legal Orientalism" is an ambitious legal and historic inquiry from the author Teemu Ruskola, who investigates the formation of Orientalism from a postcolonial legal perspective, i.e. ...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

第三章比較中國的宗族財産管理和美國公司法挺有意思的。其他內容感覺論述都不是很充足。但是全書總體來說還是非常ambitious and imaginative的，衝著立意加一星。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

An ambitious yet incredibly illuminating book from a postcolonial legal perspective. Recommended to any foreigner who finds himself stuck in a stereotypical view of China and Chinese law.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

中國法律是txt而非exe，真是這樣嗎？舉個栗子，和飛行員朋友聊天，問他們aviation law怎麼來的，丫說直接照抄美加法律然後把相關數據中國特色一下，蛤蛤——作者問題意識不錯，認知與闡釋上還有待提高，跨專業這玩意要麼極好要麼特糟，不大會産生平庸的作品

评分☆☆☆☆☆

主要內容一百頁就能寫明白，有點囉嗦瞭，而且落不到實處。第三章其實該單獨拿齣來多寫點，放在裏麵作為一章覺得有些奇怪。優點在於視角獨特，寫美國的法律東方主義和西方對中國法律的認識。以及中國作為"他者"對美國法律以及美國人身份起到塑造作用。這種認識往往齣自於想象和偏見。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

還是挺扯的啊，特彆是關於公司法與傢族比較那部分……給外國人看看好瞭何必再譯成中文