Teemu Ruskola is Professor of Law at Emory University.
Since the Cold War ended, China has become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the United States has positioned itself as the world's chief exporter of the rule of law. How did lawlessness become an axiom about Chineseness rather than a fact needing to be verified empirically, and how did the United States assume the mantle of law's universal appeal? In a series of wide-ranging inquiries, Teemu Ruskola investigates the history of "legal Orientalism": a set of globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it. For example, why is China said not to have a history of corporate law, as a way of explaining its "failure" to develop capitalism on its own? Ruskola shows how a European tradition of philosophical prejudices about Chinese law developed into a distinctively American ideology of empire, influential to this day. The first Sino-U.S. treaty in 1844 authorized the extraterritorial application of American law in a putatively lawless China. A kind of legal imperialism, this practice long predated U.S. territorial colonialism after the Spanish-American War in 1898, and found its fullest expression in an American district court's jurisdiction over the "District of China. " With urgent contemporary implications, legal Orientalism lives on in the enduring damage wrought on the U.S. Constitution by late nineteenth-century anti-Chinese immigration laws, and in the self-Orientalizing reforms of Chinese law today. In the global politics of trade and human rights, legal Orientalism continues to shape modern subjectivities, institutions, and geopolitics in powerful and unacknowledged ways.
發表於2025-02-02
Legal Orientalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
How the West denied China's law Legal Orientalism: China, the US and Modern Law by Teemu Ruskola By Dinesh Sharma http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-270913.html 簡單地說,所謂東方沒有法律的說法是一種文化沙文和文化種族歧視。由於近代化對中國的影響...
評分How the West denied China's law Legal Orientalism: China, the US and Modern Law by Teemu Ruskola By Dinesh Sharma http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-270913.html 簡單地說,所謂東方沒有法律的說法是一種文化沙文和文化種族歧視。由於近代化對中國的影響...
評分How the West denied China's law Legal Orientalism: China, the US and Modern Law by Teemu Ruskola By Dinesh Sharma http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-270913.html 簡單地說,所謂東方沒有法律的說法是一種文化沙文和文化種族歧視。由於近代化對中國的影響...
評分[Copyright 2016 mozartera. Please indicate the source when reposting.] "Legal Orientalism" is an ambitious legal and historic inquiry from the author Teemu Ruskola, who investigates the formation of Orientalism from a postcolonial legal perspective, i.e. ...
評分[Copyright 2016 mozartera. Please indicate the source when reposting.] "Legal Orientalism" is an ambitious legal and historic inquiry from the author Teemu Ruskola, who investigates the formation of Orientalism from a postcolonial legal perspective, i.e. ...
圖書標籤: 法律史 法學 海外中國研究 東方主義 法律史與法律文化 中國 英文原版 清代
中國法律是txt而非exe,真是這樣嗎?舉個栗子,和飛行員朋友聊天,問他們aviation law怎麼來的,丫說直接照抄美加法律然後把相關數據中國特色一下,蛤蛤——作者問題意識不錯,認知與闡釋上還有待提高,跨專業這玩意要麼極好要麼特糟,不大會産生平庸的作品
評分還是挺扯的啊,特彆是關於公司法與傢族比較那部分……給外國人看看好瞭何必再譯成中文
評分a little bit American-centered! but still an impressive one!
評分westernization=self-orientalization ?
評分中國法律是txt而非exe,真是這樣嗎?舉個栗子,和飛行員朋友聊天,問他們aviation law怎麼來的,丫說直接照抄美加法律然後把相關數據中國特色一下,蛤蛤——作者問題意識不錯,認知與闡釋上還有待提高,跨專業這玩意要麼極好要麼特糟,不大會産生平庸的作品
Legal Orientalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載