发表于2024-11-15
Radical Enlightenment 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 思想史 政治哲学 Enlightenment 社会史 欧洲思想史 历史 資本主義 荷蘭
In the wake of the Scientific Revolution, the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries saw the complete demolition of traditional structures of authority, scientific thought, and belief by the new philosophy and the philosophes, including Voltaire, Diderot, and Rousseau. The Radical Enlightenment played a part in this revolutionary process, which effectively overthrew all justification for monarchy, aristocracy, and ecclesiastical power, as well as man's dominance over woman, theological dominance of education, and slavery. Despite the present day interest in the revolutions of the eighteenth century, the origins and rise of the Radical Enlightenment have received limited scholarly attention. The greatest obstacle to the movement finding its proper place in modern historical writing is its international scope: the Racial Enlightenment was not French, British, German, Italian, Jewish or Dutch, but all of these at the same time.
In this wide-ranging volume, Jonathan Israel offers a novel interpretation of the Radical Enlightenment down to La Mettie and Diderot, two of its key exponents. Particular emphasis is placed on the pivotal role of Spinoza and the widespread underground international philosophical movement known before 1750 as Spinozism.
写得不好。不是说Israel本身对Spinoza的分析有什么细枝末节的技术问题,而是这本书的整个分析框架其实挺problematic的。在某种意义上,Israel跟以前的Adorno他们一样,要不你就全盘接受Enlightenment,要不你就彻底地把它否定掉。这种从一个极端到另一个极端的分析框架其实真的没什么益处。一个历史学家其实更应该去看Enlightenment里面的那些ambiguities, uncertainties, tensions,不然整个分析就很缺乏张力和洞察力了。
评分写得不好。不是说Israel本身对Spinoza的分析有什么细枝末节的技术问题,而是这本书的整个分析框架其实挺problematic的。在某种意义上,Israel跟以前的Adorno他们一样,要不你就全盘接受Enlightenment,要不你就彻底地把它否定掉。这种从一个极端到另一个极端的分析框架其实真的没什么益处。一个历史学家其实更应该去看Enlightenment里面的那些ambiguities, uncertainties, tensions,不然整个分析就很缺乏张力和洞察力了。
评分写得不好。不是说Israel本身对Spinoza的分析有什么细枝末节的技术问题,而是这本书的整个分析框架其实挺problematic的。在某种意义上,Israel跟以前的Adorno他们一样,要不你就全盘接受Enlightenment,要不你就彻底地把它否定掉。这种从一个极端到另一个极端的分析框架其实真的没什么益处。一个历史学家其实更应该去看Enlightenment里面的那些ambiguities, uncertainties, tensions,不然整个分析就很缺乏张力和洞察力了。
评分写得不好。不是说Israel本身对Spinoza的分析有什么细枝末节的技术问题,而是这本书的整个分析框架其实挺problematic的。在某种意义上,Israel跟以前的Adorno他们一样,要不你就全盘接受Enlightenment,要不你就彻底地把它否定掉。这种从一个极端到另一个极端的分析框架其实真的没什么益处。一个历史学家其实更应该去看Enlightenment里面的那些ambiguities, uncertainties, tensions,不然整个分析就很缺乏张力和洞察力了。
评分写得不好。不是说Israel本身对Spinoza的分析有什么细枝末节的技术问题,而是这本书的整个分析框架其实挺problematic的。在某种意义上,Israel跟以前的Adorno他们一样,要不你就全盘接受Enlightenment,要不你就彻底地把它否定掉。这种从一个极端到另一个极端的分析框架其实真的没什么益处。一个历史学家其实更应该去看Enlightenment里面的那些ambiguities, uncertainties, tensions,不然整个分析就很缺乏张力和洞察力了。
Radical Enlightenment 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书