高彥頤,(Dorothy Ko) 美國斯坦福大學國際關係學學士、東亞曆史係博士,專攻明清社會史及比較婦女史。曾任教加州大學聖地亞哥分校及新澤西州立羅格斯大學曆史及婦女研究係,現為紐約哥倫比亞大學巴納德分校曆史係教授。近作有《步步生蓮:綉鞋與纏足文物》(Every Step a Lotus:Shoes for BoundFeet)及《閨塾師:明末清初江南的纔女文化》(TeaeheFS of the Inner Chambers:Women andCulture in Seventeenth—Century China)等書。
The history of footbinding is full of contradictions and unexpected turns. The practice originated in the dance culture of China's medieval court and spread to gentry families, brothels, maid's quarters, and peasant households. Conventional views of footbinding as patriarchal oppression often neglect its complex history and the incentives of the women involved. This revisionist history, elegantly written and meticulously researched, presents a fascinating new picture of the practice from its beginnings in the tenth century to its demise in the twentieth century. Neither condemning nor defending foot-binding, Dorothy Ko debunks many myths and misconceptions about its origins, development, and eventual end, exploring in the process the entanglements of male power and female desires during the practice's thousand-year history. Cinderella's Sisters argues that rather than stemming from sexual perversion, men's desire for bound feet was connected to larger concerns such as cultural nostalgia, regional rivalries, and claims of male privilege. Nor were women hapless victims, the author contends. Ko describes how women--those who could afford it--bound their own and their daughters' feet to signal their high status and self-respect. Femininity, like the binding of feet, was associated with bodily labor and domestic work, and properly bound feet and beautifully made shoes both required exquisite skills and technical knowledge passed from generation to generation. Throughout her narrative, Ko deftly wields methods of social history, literary criticism, material culture studies, and the history of the body and fashion to illustrate how a practice that began as embodied lyricism--as a way to live as the poets imagined--ended up being an exercise in excess and folly.
發表於2025-03-07
Cinderella's Sisters 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
就是想象一個更復雜生動傳統女性生活的世界。 客觀來講,現在好像也沒有在敘事文本裏看到男性知識和權力意誌對女性的壓迫。怎麼就被莫名其妙敵對起來瞭 但是為自己發聲是對的。 神話構建。欲望符碼 但是說審美欲望用來取悅彆人,這個肯定是不對的。 婦女地位是檢驗一個國傢文明...
評分關於纏足的文字之前也零散的在一些社會性彆研究的刊物中讀到過,但並沒有什麼深刻的記憶,老生常談的批評總是難以讓人有所關注。 讀高老師的關於《纏足——<金蓮崇拜>盛極而衰的演變》的讀後感緣起於復旦的邂逅,那場關於何震的圓桌會議讓我被這位謙和睿智,坦率爽...
評分就是想象一個更復雜生動傳統女性生活的世界。 客觀來講,現在好像也沒有在敘事文本裏看到男性知識和權力意誌對女性的壓迫。怎麼就被莫名其妙敵對起來瞭 但是為自己發聲是對的。 神話構建。欲望符碼 但是說審美欲望用來取悅彆人,這個肯定是不對的。 婦女地位是檢驗一個國傢文明...
評分曾祖母是小腳女人。據父親說身量矮小,白淨,柔順。是大傢閨秀的樣子。 因此早在習學“纏足之害”這些主流話語以前,我便已形成對纏足的復雜認知:纏足事關承擔傢道中落之痛的曾祖父,事關吸食鴉片養四房姨太太的曾曾祖父,事關那些似是而非的傢族興衰史。纏足於我不...
評分太艱澀瞭,無論是寫得過程還是寫齣來的東西都太艱澀瞭。 女性主義將看似“自然的”化作“曆史的”,曆史學也是同樣。 --------------------- 在賀蕭和王政以“社會性彆”這一分析範疇在中國曆史研究領域的應用為主題所做的文獻綜述中,高彥頤的《纏足》一書被描述為“顛覆瞭中...
圖書標籤: 高彥頤 中國社會 纏足 社會性彆 曆史 介 人類學 world
範例。
評分範例。
評分範例。
評分範例。
評分範例。
Cinderella's Sisters 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載