Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分從Kant到Derrida的歐陸哲學史(其實也就鎖定在幾個人:Kant、Hegel、Nietzsche、Heidegger、Foucault、Derrida)。講的最清楚的是Kant,但談的最多的是Heidegger,也許太多了一點。Foucault跟Derrida的部份不覺得有特別新奇的論點。
评分Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分從Kant到Derrida的歐陸哲學史(其實也就鎖定在幾個人:Kant、Hegel、Nietzsche、Heidegger、Foucault、Derrida)。講的最清楚的是Kant,但談的最多的是Heidegger,也許太多了一點。Foucault跟Derrida的部份不覺得有特別新奇的論點。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有