This book provides a definitive account of Jacques Derrida's involvement in debates about the university. Derrida was a founding member of the Research Group on the Teaching of Philosophy (GREPH), an activist group that mobilized opposition to the Giscard government's proposals to rationalizethe French educational system in 1975. He also helped to convene the Estates General of Philosophy, a vast gathering in 1979 of educators from across France. Furthermore, he was closely associated with the founding of the International College of Philosophy in Paris, and his connection with the International Parliament of Writers during the 1990s also illustrates his continuing interest in the possibility of launching an array of literary and philosophical projects while experimenting with new kinds of institutions in which they might take their specific shape and direction. Derrida argues that the place of philosophy in the university should be explored as both a historical question and a philosophical problem in its own right. He argues that philosophy simultaneously belongs and does not belong to the university. In its founding role, it must come from outsidethe institution in which, nevertheless, it comes to define itself. The author asks whether this irresolvable tension between belongingand not belongingmight not also form the basis of Derrida's political thinking and activism where wider issues of contemporary significance are concerned. Key questions today concerning citizenship, rights, the nation-state and Europe, asylum, immigration, terror, and the returnof religion all involve assumptions and ideas about belonging; and they entail constitutional, legal, institutional and material constraints that take shape precisely on the basis of such ideas. This project will therefore open up a key question: Can deconstruction's insight into the paradoxical institutional standing of philosophy form the basis of a meaningful political response by theoryto a number of contemporary international issues?
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,这本书对我个人价值观的冲击是巨大的。它挑战了我长期以来习以为常的许多认知框架,迫使我重新审视一些我从未深思过的问题。其中关于权力结构和个体能动性的讨论,尤其让我感到震撼。作者并没有提供简单的答案,而是提出了更多更深刻的问题,引导读者自己去构建理解世界的新模型。在读完最后一页时,我感到一种前所未有的清醒,同时也有一种迷茫——因为世界在你眼前突然变得复杂而多维了。这本书的后劲很足,它不是读完就丢在一边的消遣品,而是会持续在你脑海中发酵、生长,成为你理解后续经历的一个参照系。
评分这本书的装帧设计真是太引人注目了。我拿到手的时候,首先就被封面那种强烈的视觉冲击力吸引住了。那种粗粝的质感,混合着某种复古的印刷痕迹,似乎在无声地诉说着某种历史的重量。我一直在想,这本书里究竟藏着怎样一番波澜壮阔的故事,才能配得上如此厚重的外壳。内页的排版也很有匠心,字体的选择和留白的运用都恰到好处,让人在阅读时有一种沉浸式的体验。我尤其欣赏作者在细节上投入的心思,比如扉页上的那句引言,虽然简短,却像是一把钥匙,瞬间打开了我对书中世界的想象。整本书拿在手里沉甸甸的,感觉就像是在握着一个知识的宝藏,让人迫不及待地想要翻开它,去探索那些未知的领域。
评分这本书的结构处理堪称一绝。它不是线性的叙事,更像是一张错综复杂的网,各个章节之间存在着微妙的呼应和回响。有时候,你可能需要回翻到前几章,才能真正理解当前段落中作者的深层用意。这种非线性的编排,不仅要求读者有耐心,更考验了作者对整体脉络的掌控力。我佩服作者如何能在如此庞杂的素材中,找到那些隐藏的联系,并将它们有机地编织在一起。读完之后,我仿佛经历了一次彻底的思维重塑训练,对信息处理和系统性思考有了全新的认识。这本书无疑是近年来我读过的,在结构和内容上都最具野心的一部作品。
评分这本书的语言风格给我留下了极其深刻的印象。它不像我之前读过的那些学术著作那样刻板、说教,反而充满了生命力和某种反叛精神。作者似乎有一种天赋,能把最抽象的概念用最生动的比喻描绘出来,让那些晦涩难懂的理论瞬间变得鲜活起来。我特别喜欢他那种夹带着幽默感和讽刺意味的笔调,时而尖锐,时而又充满了人性的关怀。在一些关键的章节,我甚至能想象出作者在写作时的那种激情和毫不妥协的态度。这种强烈的个人风格,使得阅读过程充满了乐趣,仿佛不是在读一本书,而是在与一位充满智慧和激情的思想家进行着一场跨越时空的对话。
评分我花了很长时间来消化这本书带给我的冲击。它不是那种轻松愉快的读物,更像是一场智力上的探险。作者的叙事方式非常独特,他似乎总能在最意想不到的地方设置转折,让你以为自己已经掌握了故事的主线,却又被他巧妙地带入了一个全新的视角。读到中间部分的时候,我几乎是屏住呼吸在看,那些复杂的逻辑关系和层层递进的论证,真的需要集中全部的注意力去跟进。有时候我需要停下来,合上书本,在房间里踱步思考,试图理清作者抛出的那些看似矛盾却又环环相扣的观点。这种阅读过程虽然烧脑,但带来的成就感也是无与伦比的,感觉自己仿佛也参与了一场思想的激荡。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有